• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动力髋螺钉与空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Dynamic hip screws versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 26;15(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01842-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-020-01842-z
PMID:32843048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7449015/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dynamic hip screw (DHS) and cannulated screws (CS) are widely used for femoral neck fractures. However, there is no definite result as to which surgical method bring less complications. We performed this study to compare the complication (mortality, non-union, avascular necrosis (AVN), and revision) of DHS and CS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures patients.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other relevant studies related the comparison of DHS versus CS for femoral neck fractures from inception to Jan 7, 2020. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Newcastle-Ottawa (NOS), respectively. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.2 software.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs and seven retrospective cohort studies were included for meta-analysis. CS was found to be superior to DHS with respect to AVN rate (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.08-1.99; p = 0.01, I = 0%). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to mortality, non-union, and revision (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DHS and CS have similar complication including mortality, revision rate, and non-union, but CS has superior to DHS on ANV. However, further studies are required to provide more robust evidence owing to some limitations.

摘要

目的

动力髋螺钉(DHS)和空心螺钉(CS)广泛应用于股骨颈骨折的治疗。然而,哪种手术方法并发症更少尚无明确结论。我们进行这项研究是为了比较 DHS 和 CS 治疗股骨颈骨折患者的并发症(死亡率、不愈合、股骨头坏死(AVN)和翻修)。

方法

我们检索了 Pubmed、Ovid、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和其他相关研究,以比较 DHS 与 CS 治疗股骨颈骨折的研究,检索时间从建库至 2020 年 1 月 7 日。使用 Cochrane 协作工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估纳入的随机对照试验(RCT)和回顾性队列研究的质量。使用 RevMan 5.2 软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了 9 项 RCT 和 7 项回顾性队列研究进行荟萃分析。CS 在 AVN 发生率方面优于 DHS(OR 1.47;95%CI 1.08-1.99;p = 0.01,I = 0%)。两组在死亡率、不愈合和翻修方面无显著差异(p > 0.05)。

结论

DHS 和 CS 的并发症相似,包括死亡率、翻修率和不愈合,但 CS 在 AVN 方面优于 DHS。然而,由于存在一些局限性,需要进一步的研究提供更有力的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/5c25d4264f4c/13018_2020_1842_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/186d1c8a14d6/13018_2020_1842_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/0de6d7b5cd04/13018_2020_1842_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/7b666547e323/13018_2020_1842_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/87b6e6b12093/13018_2020_1842_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/9d30418ff9a9/13018_2020_1842_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/5aa625b2ba08/13018_2020_1842_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/5c25d4264f4c/13018_2020_1842_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/186d1c8a14d6/13018_2020_1842_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/0de6d7b5cd04/13018_2020_1842_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/7b666547e323/13018_2020_1842_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/87b6e6b12093/13018_2020_1842_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/9d30418ff9a9/13018_2020_1842_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/5aa625b2ba08/13018_2020_1842_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/7449015/5c25d4264f4c/13018_2020_1842_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic hip screws versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动力髋螺钉与空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 26;15(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01842-z.
2
Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients.空心螺钉与动力髋螺钉与半髋关节置换与全髋关节置换治疗移位与非移位股骨颈骨折患者:5703 例患者的系统评价和频率网络荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 26;18(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04114-8.
3
Dynamic hip system blade versus cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: A retrospective study.动力髋系统刀片与空心加压螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的回顾性研究。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Oct;51(5):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
4
[Comparison among three cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw combined with antirotation screw for comminut- ed fractures of femoral neck].三种空心螺钉与动力髋螺钉联合防旋螺钉治疗股骨颈粉碎性骨折的比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Sep;28(9):796-801.
5
Treatment of non-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures with dynamic hip and cannulated screws resulting in avascular necrosis: A comparative study of complications.动力髋螺钉与空心钉内固定治疗无移位股骨颈骨折并发股骨头坏死的对比研究
Saudi Med J. 2024 Jan;45(1):54-59. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230684.
6
Multiple cannulated screws vs. dynamic hip screws for femoral neck fractures : A meta-analysis.多枚空心螺钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的Meta分析
Orthopade. 2017 Nov;46(11):954-962. doi: 10.1007/s00132-017-3473-8.
7
Treatment of femoral neck fractures: sliding hip screw or cannulated screws? A meta-analysis.治疗股骨颈骨折:滑动髋螺钉还是空心螺钉?一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02189-1.
8
[Efficacy comparison between dynamic hip screw combined with anti-rotation screw and cannulated screw in treating femoral neck fractures].动力髋螺钉联合防旋螺钉与空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;25(1):26-9.
9
Comparison of dynamic hip screw and antirotation screw with cannulated screw in the treatment of transcervical collum femoris fractures.动力髋螺钉联合防旋螺钉与空心螺钉治疗股骨颈经颈型骨折的比较
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(2):320-327. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.73416. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
10
Study protocol for the DEFENDD trial: an RCT on the Dynamic Locking Blade Plate (DLBP) versus the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) for displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 65 years and younger.DEFENDD试验研究方案:一项针对65岁及以下移位型股骨颈骨折患者,比较动力锁定接骨板(DLBP)与动力髋螺钉(DHS)的随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Mar 3;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3131-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Preoperative CT Improve Outcomes in Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation? A Retrospective Study.术前CT能否改善股骨颈骨折固定的疗效?一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 21;14(16):5917. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165917.
2
Narrative Review on the Management of Neck of Femur Fractures in People Living with HIV: Challenges, Complications, and Long-Term Outcomes.关于艾滋病毒感染者股骨颈骨折管理的叙述性综述:挑战、并发症及长期结局
Microorganisms. 2025 Jun 30;13(7):1530. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13071530.
3
A comparative study of internal fixation with porous tantalum screws and cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw and Two Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Undisplaced Intracapsular Neck Fractures-Two-Year Follow-Up of 453 Patients.动力髋螺钉与两枚空心螺钉治疗无移位囊内股骨颈骨折的比较——453例患者的两年随访
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 12;8(10):1670. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101670.
2
How do Orthopedic Surgeons Manage Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture in the Middle-Aged Patient? Brazilian Survey of 78 Orthopaedic Surgeons.骨科医生如何处理中年患者的移位型股骨颈骨折?对78名骨科医生的巴西调查。
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 May;54(3):288-294. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691761. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
3
Sliding hip screws versus cancellous screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
多孔钽金属螺钉与空心螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的对比研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04188-w.
4
Biomechanical properties of off-axis screw in the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.垂直型股骨颈骨折治疗中偏轴螺钉的生物力学特性:有限元分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 15;26(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08722-9.
5
Outcomes of salvage total hip arthroplasty after failed cannulated screw fixation of fractured neck of femur.股骨颈骨折空心螺钉固定失败后挽救性全髋关节置换术的疗效
J Orthop. 2024 Jul 25;59:119-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.07.009. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Long-term outcomes following closed reduction and internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with cannulated screws in patients under 65 years.65岁以下患者采用空心螺钉对股骨颈骨折进行闭合复位内固定后的长期疗效
Hippokratia. 2024 Jan-Mar;28(1):29-34.
7
Finite Element Analysis of Six Internal Fixations in the Treatment of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture.Pauwels Ⅲ 型股骨颈骨折 6 种内固定物的有限元分析
Orthop Surg. 2024 Jul;16(7):1695-1709. doi: 10.1111/os.14069. Epub 2024 May 15.
8
Treatment of non-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures with dynamic hip and cannulated screws resulting in avascular necrosis: A comparative study of complications.动力髋螺钉与空心钉内固定治疗无移位股骨颈骨折并发股骨头坏死的对比研究
Saudi Med J. 2024 Jan;45(1):54-59. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230684.
9
Fixation of femoral neck fracture with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study of 43 patients.股骨颈系统固定股骨颈骨折:43 例回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07113-2.
10
What is the best method of fixation for minimally displaced subcapital neck of femur fractures? A systematic review.对于股骨颈基底部轻度移位骨折,最佳的固定方法是什么?一项系统评价。
J Orthop. 2023 Oct 7;45:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.09.015. eCollection 2023 Nov.
动力髋螺钉与松质骨螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Oct;29(7):1383-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02460-0. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
4
Dhs plus anti-rotational screw vs cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: an analysis of clinical outcome and incidence regarding avn.动力髋螺钉联合抗旋转螺钉与空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的临床疗效及股骨头缺血性坏死发生率分析
Acta Orthop Belg. 2018 Sep;84(3):279-283.
5
Is dynamic locking plate superior than other implants for intracapsular hip fracture: A meta-analysis.动力锁定钢板在治疗髋关节囊内骨折方面是否优于其他植入物:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(47):e13001. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013001.
6
Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN.采用CCS、DHS和PFN治疗年轻成人股骨粗隆下骨折的对比分析
Rev Bras Ortop. 2018 Feb 3;53(6):783-787. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.022. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
7
Multiple cannulated screws vs. dynamic hip screws for femoral neck fractures : A meta-analysis.多枚空心螺钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的Meta分析
Orthopade. 2017 Nov;46(11):954-962. doi: 10.1007/s00132-017-3473-8.
8
Dynamic hip system blade versus cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: A retrospective study.动力髋系统刀片与空心加压螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的回顾性研究。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Oct;51(5):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
9
Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.髋关节骨折手术治疗中的骨折固定(FAITH):一项国际、多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 15;389(10078):1519-1527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30066-1. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Comparative study of multiple cancellous screws versus sliding hip screws in femoral neck fractures of young adults.年轻成人股骨颈骨折中多枚松质骨螺钉与滑动髋螺钉的比较研究
Chin J Traumatol. 2016 Aug 1;19(4):209-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.11.021.