Suppr超能文献

多孔钽金属螺钉与空心螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的对比研究

A comparative study of internal fixation with porous tantalum screws and cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

作者信息

Zhao Dewei, Zhang Yu, Cheng Liangliang, Ma Zhijie, Wang Feng, Qiu Xing, Ying Jiawei, Zhang Tianwei, Wang Fuyang

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, No 6 Jiefang Street, Zhongshan District, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04188-w.

Abstract

Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are a significant concern, particularly in elderly patients with osteoporosis and younger individuals experiencing high-energy traumas. Traditional treatments, like cannulated compression screws (CCSs), often result in complications such as avascular necrosis (AVN). This study evaluated the effectiveness of bidirectional compression porous tantalum screws (BCPTSs) against conventional CCSs in FNF treatment. A retrospective study was conducted on 109 patients with FNF treated at Zhongshan Hospital, Dalian University, from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the fixation method: two CCSs, three CCSs, and BCPTSs. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using anteroposterior radiographs, with follow-up evaluations at six weeks, three months, 12 months, and 24 months. Diabetic patients were also included as subjects of observation to analyze the association between postoperative osteonecrosis and diabetes. In the two CCSs group, seven patients (7/20, 35%) experienced AVN, compared to 17 patients (17/39, 43.58%) in the three CCSs group. In contrast, only one patient (1/50, 2%) in the BCPTSs group developed nonunion, with no cases of AVN. In a comparison among diabetic patients, there was one case of postoperative AVN in the two CCSs group, five cases in three CCSs group, and one case of fracture nonunion in the BCPTSs group. BCPTSs offer a superior alternative to conventional CCSs in treating FNF, particularly in reducing AVN and nonunion rates. The study highlights the importance of vascular preservation and contributes a new option for treating FNF.

摘要

股骨颈骨折(FNF)是一个重大问题,尤其是在患有骨质疏松症的老年患者和遭受高能量创伤的年轻个体中。传统治疗方法,如空心加压螺钉(CCS),常常会导致诸如缺血性坏死(AVN)等并发症。本研究评估了双向加压多孔钽螺钉(BCPTS)在股骨颈骨折治疗中相对于传统空心加压螺钉的有效性。对2016年1月至2020年12月在大连大学附属中山医院接受治疗的109例股骨颈骨折患者进行了一项回顾性研究。根据固定方法将患者分为三组:两枚空心加压螺钉组、三枚空心加压螺钉组和双向加压多孔钽螺钉组。使用前后位X线片评估术后结果,并在六周、三个月、12个月和24个月进行随访评估。糖尿病患者也被纳入观察对象,以分析术后骨坏死与糖尿病之间的关联。在两枚空心加压螺钉组中,7例患者(7/20,35%)发生了缺血性坏死,而在三枚空心加压螺钉组中,有17例患者(17/39,43.58%)发生了缺血性坏死。相比之下,双向加压多孔钽螺钉组只有1例患者(1/50,2%)出现骨不连,且无缺血性坏死病例。在糖尿病患者的比较中,两枚空心加压螺钉组有1例术后缺血性坏死,三枚空心加压螺钉组有5例,双向加压多孔钽螺钉组有1例骨折不愈合。在治疗股骨颈骨折方面,双向加压多孔钽螺钉是传统空心加压螺钉的一种更好的替代方法,尤其是在降低缺血性坏死和骨不连发生率方面。该研究强调了血管保护的重要性,并为治疗股骨颈骨折提供了一种新的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d7c/12134232/b65efa4853d6/41598_2025_4188_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验