Senington Billy, Lee Raymond Y, Williams Jonathan M
School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Faculty of Technology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Aug 13;6(1):e000818. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000818. eCollection 2020.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate spinal kinematics, tibial and sacral impacts during fast bowling, among bowlers with a history of low back pain (LBP) (retrospective) and bowlers who developed LBP in the follow-up season (prospective). METHODS: 35 elite male fast bowlers; senior (n=14; age=24.1±4.3 years; height=1.89±0.05 m; weight=89.2±4.6 kg) and junior (n=21; age=16.9±0.7; height=1.81±0.05; weight=73.0±9.2 kg) were recruited from professional county cricket clubs. LBP history was gathered by questionnaire and development of LBP was monitored for the follow-up season. Spinal kinematics, tibial and sacral impacts were captured using inertial measurement units placed over S1, L1, T1 and anteromedial tibia. Bonferroni corrected pairwise comparisons and effect sizes were calculated to investigate differences in retrospective and prospective LBP groups. RESULTS: Approximately 38% of juniors (n=8) and 57% of seniors (n=8) reported a history of LBP. No differences were evident in spinal kinematics or impacts between those with LBP history and those without for seniors and juniors. Large effect sizes suggest greater rotation during wind-up (d=1.3) and faster time-to-peak tibial impacts (d=1.5) in those with no history of LBP. One junior (5%) and four (29%) seniors developed LBP. No differences were evident in spinal kinematics or impacts between those who developed LBP and those who did not for seniors. In seniors, those who developed LBP had lower tibial impacts (d=1.3) and greater lumbar extension (d=1.9) during delivery. CONCLUSION: Retrospective analysis displayed non-significant differences in kinematics and impacts. It is unclear if these are adaptive or impairments. Prospective analysis demonstrated large effect sizes for lumbar extension during bowling suggesting a target for future coaching interventions.
目的:在有腰痛病史的投球手(回顾性研究)和在后续赛季中出现腰痛的投球手(前瞻性研究)中,调查快速投球时的脊柱运动学、胫骨和骶骨撞击情况。 方法:从职业郡板球俱乐部招募了35名精英男性快速投球手;高级组(n = 14;年龄 = 24.1±4.3岁;身高 = 1.89±0.05米;体重 = 89.2±4.6千克)和初级组(n = 21;年龄 = 16.9±0.7;身高 = 1.81±0.05;体重 = 73.0±9.2千克)。通过问卷调查收集腰痛病史,并在后续赛季监测腰痛的发生情况。使用放置在S1、L1、T₁和胫骨前内侧的惯性测量单元记录脊柱运动学以及胫骨和骶骨撞击情况。计算经邦费罗尼校正的成对比较和效应量,以研究回顾性和前瞻性腰痛组之间的差异。 结果:约38%的初级组投球手(n = 8)和57%的高级组投球手(n = 8)报告有腰痛病史。对于高级组和初级组,有腰痛病史者与无腰痛病史者在脊柱运动学或撞击方面无明显差异。大效应量表明,无腰痛病史者在助跑阶段旋转幅度更大(d = 1.3),胫骨撞击达到峰值的时间更快(d = 1.5)。一名初级组投球手(5%)和四名高级组投球手(29%)出现了腰痛。对于高级组,出现腰痛者与未出现腰痛者在脊柱运动学或撞击方面无明显差异。在高级组中,出现腰痛者在投球时胫骨撞击较低(d = 1.3),腰椎伸展幅度较大(d = 1.9)。 结论:回顾性分析显示在运动学和撞击方面无显著差异。尚不清楚这些差异是适应性的还是损伤性的。前瞻性分析表明,投球时腰椎伸展的效应量较大,这为未来的教练干预提供了一个目标。
Phys Ther Sport. 2008-5
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023-9-20
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018
Br J Sports Med. 2018-11-13
J Sci Med Sport. 2016-2
Sports Med Health Sci. 2023-12-29
S Afr J Sports Med. 2023-6-5
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023-9-20
Life (Basel). 2022-12-28
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019-2
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018