• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我必须独立’:澳大利亚新南威尔士州老年人对道路交通伤害后康复的看法。”

I've got to be independent': views of older people on recovery following road traffic injury in New South Wales, Australia.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):1294. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09391-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09391-0
PMID:32847576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7448973/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mild to moderate road traffic injury (RTI) in people of working age is associated with limited recovery. Less is known about RTI recovery in older age. This study explored the perspectives and factors associated with recovery and health-related quality of life following mild to moderate RTI in older age in New South Wales, Australia.

METHODS

A qualitative study using content analysis was undertaken. Participants aged 65 or more years were purposively selected from a larger inception cohort study of health outcomes following mild to moderate RTI conducted in New South Wales, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken at approximately 12 or 24 months post-injury. Content analysis was used to code and analyse the data, with methodological rigour obtained by double-coding and discussing findings to reach consensus. Results were reported using the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).

RESULTS

Nineteen participants were invited to participate in the study of which 12 completed interviews. Data saturation was reached at the twelfth interview. Recovery experiences were diverse. Five main themes were identified: recovery is regaining independence; injury and disability in older age; the burden of non-obvious disability; the importance of support; and positive personal approaches. Key facilitators of recovery were: regaining independence; support from family and friends; and positive personal approaches. Key barriers were: threats to independence; passive coping behaviours; non-obvious disabilities (chronic pain, psychological impacts); and reluctance to raise ongoing issues with General Practitioners. Threats to independence, especially not driving and self-care, appeared to have a more profound effect on recovery than physical functioning.

CONCLUSION

Older people view injury as a threat to independent functioning. This is somewhat different to what younger people report. Regaining independence is key to older people's recovery and health-related quality of life following RTI, and should be a key consideration for health professionals, services and supports working with this unique cohort. Greater efforts to help older people regain their independence following RTI are needed and can be facilitated by health professionals and appropriate service provision.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia New Zealand clinical trial registry identification number ACTRN12613000889752 .

摘要

背景

在工作年龄段的人发生轻度至中度道路交通伤害(RTI)与恢复受限有关。对于老年人发生 RTI 后的恢复情况,人们知之甚少。本研究在澳大利亚新南威尔士州探索了老年人发生轻度至中度 RTI 后与恢复和健康相关的生活质量相关的观点和因素。

方法

采用内容分析法进行了一项定性研究。从澳大利亚新南威尔士州一项关于轻度至中度 RTI 后健康结果的更大初始队列研究中,有目的地选择了年龄在 65 岁或以上的参与者。在受伤后约 12 或 24 个月进行了半结构化访谈。采用内容分析法对数据进行编码和分析,并通过双编码和讨论研究结果以达成共识来获得方法学严谨性。使用定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ)报告结果。

结果

邀请了 19 名参与者参加本研究,其中 12 名完成了访谈。在第十二次访谈时达到了数据饱和。恢复经验各不相同。确定了五个主要主题:恢复是重新获得独立性;老年人的伤害和残疾;非明显残疾的负担;支持的重要性;以及积极的个人方法。恢复的主要促进因素是:重新获得独立性;来自家人和朋友的支持;以及积极的个人方法。主要障碍是:独立性受到威胁;被动应对行为;非明显残疾(慢性疼痛、心理影响);以及不愿向全科医生提出持续存在的问题。独立性受到威胁,特别是无法驾驶和自理,似乎对老年人的恢复和 RTI 后的健康相关生活质量产生了比身体功能更深远的影响。

结论

老年人将伤害视为独立功能的威胁。这与年轻人的报告有所不同。对于老年人来说,重新获得独立性是其 RTI 后恢复和健康相关生活质量的关键,应成为从事这一独特人群工作的卫生专业人员、服务和支持的主要考虑因素。需要做出更大的努力来帮助老年人在 RTI 后重新获得独立性,卫生专业人员和适当的服务提供可以为此提供便利。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册号 ACTRN12613000889752 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/762d/7448973/bac20911d28a/12889_2020_9391_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/762d/7448973/bac20911d28a/12889_2020_9391_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/762d/7448973/bac20911d28a/12889_2020_9391_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
I've got to be independent': views of older people on recovery following road traffic injury in New South Wales, Australia.“我必须独立’:澳大利亚新南威尔士州老年人对道路交通伤害后康复的看法。”
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):1294. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09391-0.
2
Positive recovery for low-risk injuries screened by the short form - Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire following road traffic injury: evidence from an inception cohort study in New South Wales, Australia.采用 Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷(short form - Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire)对道路交通伤害进行筛查的低危损伤的积极康复:来自澳大利亚新南威尔士州队列研究的证据。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 13;20(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2881-9.
3
Overview of findings from a 2-year study of claimants who had sustained a mild or moderate injury in a road traffic crash: prospective study.一项针对在道路交通事故中受轻度或中度损伤的索赔者进行的为期两年研究的结果概述:前瞻性研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Feb 1;10(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2401-7.
4
Factors associated with long term work incapacity following a non-catastrophic road traffic injury: analysis of a two-year prospective cohort study.与非灾难性道路交通事故伤害后长期工作能力丧失相关的因素:一项为期两年的前瞻性队列研究分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;22(1):1498. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13884-5.
5
Impacts of injury severity on long-term outcomes following motor vehicle crashes.交通事故后损伤严重程度对长期结局的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 27;21(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10638-7.
6
Predictors of health-related quality of life after non-catastrophic injury sustained in a road traffic crash.道路交通事故中非灾难性损伤后健康相关生活质量的预测因素。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Jul;63(4):280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
7
Consumer views about aging-in-place.消费者对原地养老的看法。
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Nov 4;10:1803-11. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S90672. eCollection 2015.
8
The injury trajectory for young people 16-24 years in the six months following injury: A mixed methods study.16至24岁年轻人受伤后六个月的损伤轨迹:一项混合方法研究。
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):1966-74. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.037. Epub 2016 May 26.
9
Young peoples' experience and self-management in the six months following major injury: A qualitative study.青少年重伤后六个月的经历与自我管理:一项定性研究。
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1841-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.036. Epub 2015 May 22.
10
The experience of emotional wellbeing for patients with physical injury: A qualitative follow-up study.身体受伤患者的情绪健康体验:一项定性随访研究。
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):1983-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological Profile of Road Traffic Injury Patients in Hospitals in Fako Division, Cameroon: A Foundation for Tailored Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Management.喀麦隆法科分区医院道路交通伤患者的流行病学概况:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)个性化管理的基础
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.10.25329319. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.10.25329319.
2
Describing long-term postinjury outcomes for older New Zealanders.描述新西兰老年人受伤后的长期结果。
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Mar;44(1):e13411. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13411.
3
Frailty assessment in critically ill older adults: a narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
Biopsychosocial barriers affecting recovery after a minor transport-related injury: A qualitative study from Victoria.影响轻微交通相关损伤后康复的生物心理社会障碍:来自维多利亚州的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1003-1012. doi: 10.1111/hex.12907. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
2
Everyday life after a hip fracture: what community-living older adults perceive as most beneficial for their recovery.髋部骨折后的日常生活:社区生活中的老年人认为对他们康复最有益的是什么。
Age Ageing. 2019 May 1;48(3):440-447. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz012.
3
Major trauma in older persons.
危重症老年患者的衰弱评估:一项叙述性综述
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Jun 18;14(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01315-0.
4
The trajectory of very old critically ill patients.非常高龄危重症患者的转归。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Feb;50(2):181-194. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07298-z. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
5
A scoping review of older patients' health-related quality of life, recovery and well-being after intensive care.一项针对重症监护后老年患者健康相关生活质量、恢复和幸福感的范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):5900-5919. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1873. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Are There Any Differences in Road Traffic Injury Outcomes between Older and Younger Adults? Setting the Grounds for Posttraumatic Senior Personal Injury Assessment Guidelines.老年人和年轻人在道路交通伤害结果上有差异吗?为创伤后老年人人身伤害评估指南奠定基础。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 17;12(6):2353. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062353.
老年人的严重创伤。
BJS Open. 2018 Jun 23;2(5):310-318. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.80. eCollection 2018 Sep.
4
Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: A systematic review.与轻微交通相关损伤后无法康复相关的生物心理社会因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 12;13(6):e0198352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198352. eCollection 2018.
5
"That's what you do for people you love": A qualitative study of social support and recovery from a musculoskeletal injury.“这就是你为爱你之人所做的事”:一项关于社会支持与肌肉骨骼损伤康复的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0196337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196337. eCollection 2018.
6
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder among Older Adults Experiencing Motor Vehicle Collision: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.老年机动车碰撞后创伤后应激障碍:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;25(9):953-963. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
The impact of injuries on health service resource use and costs in primary and secondary care in the English NHS.伤害对英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)初级和二级医疗保健中卫生服务资源使用及成本的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Dec 2;38(4):e464-e471. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv173.
8
Overview of findings from a 2-year study of claimants who had sustained a mild or moderate injury in a road traffic crash: prospective study.一项针对在道路交通事故中受轻度或中度损伤的索赔者进行的为期两年研究的结果概述:前瞻性研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Feb 1;10(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2401-7.
9
Psychological impact of injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes: systematic review and meta-analysis.机动车事故致伤的心理影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e011993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011993.
10
Does one size fit all? Assessing the preferences of older and younger people for attributes of quality of life.一刀切是否可行?评估老年人和年轻人对生活质量属性的偏好。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1391-6. Epub 2016 Aug 23.