Du Jinchen, Han Guanshuang, Huang Zhaoxin
School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 23;11:1470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01470. eCollection 2020.
This paper explores the impact of different types of social entrepreneurship education cultivation models on students' opinion on social entrepreneurship, defines and classifies the emerging social entrepreneurship cultivation models in colleges and universities, and confirms the performance difference between the teacher-student co-entrepreneurship (TSCE) cultivation model and the traditional cultivation model through quantitative research. Chi-square analysis and the structural equation model are used to verify the following two conclusions: in the process of promoting the acceptance of social entrepreneurship study, the TSCE cultivation model is more effective than the traditional cultivation model; and the collaborative co-entrepreneurship cultivation model is more conducive to the deepening of practical learning than the employment co-entrepreneurship cultivation model. The research results will help colleges and universities to redesign the training process of social entrepreneurship skills, and then provide help for college students to achieve more adequate entrepreneurial preparation.
本文探讨了不同类型的社会创业教育培养模式对学生社会创业观的影响，对高校新兴的社会创业培养模式进行了定义和分类，并通过定量研究证实了师生共同创业（TSCE）培养模式与传统培养模式之间的绩效差异。运用卡方分析和结构方程模型验证了以下两个结论：在促进社会创业学习接受度的过程中，TSCE培养模式比传统培养模式更有效；协作共同创业培养模式比就业共同创业培养模式更有利于实践学习的深化。研究结果将有助于高校重新设计社会创业技能的培训过程，进而为大学生实现更充分的创业准备提供帮助。
