• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难以被说服的人:为什么智力残疾在自由社会中引发“依赖”问题。

What Escapes Persuasion: Why Intellectual Disability Troubles 'Dependence' in Liberal Societies.

机构信息

Research Associate and Affiliated Lecturer in Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge.

出版信息

Med Anthropol. 2021 Feb-Mar;40(2):155-168. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2020.1805741. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1080/01459740.2020.1805741
PMID:32852230
Abstract

What expectations about the mind do people with intellectual disabilities depart from? A dominant argument maintains that their mental dependence troubles liberal relations premised upon a myth of autonomy. By analyzing the centrality of persuasion in a home for adults with intellectual disabilities in the UK, I ask instead about the psychological assumptions made by relationships of care. Persuasion aims to cultivate, not their independence from care but rather, a recognition of their dependence upon it. Persuasive care's repeated failure suggests an alternative answer to the question: people with intellectual disabilities are too independent-minded for this form of dependence.

摘要

人们对智力残疾者的心理有哪些期望?一种主流观点认为,他们对自由关系的精神依赖违背了以自主神话为前提的自由关系。本文通过分析英国一家成人智障人士收容所中说服的核心地位,探讨了关怀关系中的心理假设。说服旨在培养的,不是他们对关怀的独立,而是对他们依赖关怀的认可。反复失败的劝导关怀表明,对这个问题有另一种答案:智力残疾者的独立意识太强,不适合这种形式的依赖。

相似文献

1
What Escapes Persuasion: Why Intellectual Disability Troubles 'Dependence' in Liberal Societies.难以被说服的人:为什么智力残疾在自由社会中引发“依赖”问题。
Med Anthropol. 2021 Feb-Mar;40(2):155-168. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2020.1805741. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
Duty of care and autonomy: how support workers managed the tension between protecting service users from risk and promoting their independence in a specialist group home.注意义务和自主权:在专门的团体家庭中,支持工作人员如何在保护服务使用者免受风险和促进其独立性之间管理这种紧张关系。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Sep;55(9):873-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01445.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
3
The group home as moral laboratory: tracing the ethic of autonomy in Dutch intellectual disability care.群体之家作为道德实验室:追踪荷兰智障人士护理中的自主伦理。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):113-125. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09991-y. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Identifying the key concerns of Irish persons with intellectual disability.识别爱尔兰智障人士的主要担忧。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Nov;27(6):564-75. doi: 10.1111/jar.12099. Epub 2014 May 22.
5
Mentally Fit: Negotiating the Boundaries of Cognitive Disability.心智健全:协商认知障碍的边界。
Med Anthropol. 2021 Feb-Mar;40(2):111-115. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2020.1858296. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
The exercise of human rights and citizenship by older adults with an intellectual disability in Ireland.爱尔兰智障老年人的人权和公民权的行使。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Oct;62(10):875-887. doi: 10.1111/jir.12543. Epub 2018 Aug 19.
7
'It's my life': autonomy and people with intellectual disabilities.“这是我的生活”:自主性与智障人士
J Intellect Disabil. 2015 Mar;19(1):5-21. doi: 10.1177/1744629514564691. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
8
Empowering words, disempowering actions: an analysis of interactions between staff members and people with learning disabilities in residents' meetings.赋予力量的言语,削弱力量的行动:对居民会议中工作人员与学习障碍者之间互动的分析
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006 Mar;50(Pt 3):212-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00771.x.
9
Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.为智障人士提供支持性决策和个人自主:《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Winter;41(4):792-806, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12090.
10
The challenges of providing palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities: a literature review.为智障人士提供姑息治疗的挑战:一项文献综述。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2014 Jun;20(6):279-84. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2014.20.6.279.

引用本文的文献

1
Persevering professionals: dilemmas of relationships and self-determination in work with people with intellectual disability - a multi-method study based on interpersonal process recall.坚持不懈的专业人士:智力障碍者工作中的关系和自我决定的困境——基于人际过程回忆的多方法研究。
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Jun;28(2):453-468. doi: 10.1177/17446295231154126. Epub 2023 Feb 1.