• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坚持不懈的专业人士:智力障碍者工作中的关系和自我决定的困境——基于人际过程回忆的多方法研究。

Persevering professionals: dilemmas of relationships and self-determination in work with people with intellectual disability - a multi-method study based on interpersonal process recall.

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.

Department of Welfare and Participation, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Jun;28(2):453-468. doi: 10.1177/17446295231154126. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1177/17446295231154126
PMID:36722381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11059826/
Abstract

The article focuses on social educators' reflections on their own professional practice in encounters with people with intellectual disability receiving services. Drawing on Interpersonal Process Recall, a video-assisted method, together with a focus group interview, the study explores the experiences from in-situ encounters of five social educators employed in a Norwegian municipality. The key findings are that they view relationship-building as integral to their work, they grant primacy to the ideal of autonomy and they strive towards realizing this in their daily work. The study however displays how these emphases might lead to dilemmas, especially between the wish to support the service users' self-determination and the urge to protect them from harm. Of special note was how the service users' increasing use of social media was perceived as a particular challenge for social educators, who were left with an experience of being unable to protect.

摘要

本文聚焦于社会教育工作者在与接受服务的智障人士相遇时对自身专业实践的反思。本研究采用人际过程回忆(一种视频辅助方法),结合焦点小组访谈,探讨了挪威一个市的五名社会教育工作者在现场遭遇中的经历。主要发现是,他们将建立关系视为工作不可或缺的一部分,他们将自主的理想置于优先地位,并努力在日常工作中实现这一理想。然而,该研究显示了这些重点如何可能导致困境,特别是在支持服务使用者的自决权的愿望和保护他们免受伤害的冲动之间。特别值得注意的是,服务使用者越来越多地使用社交媒体,这被认为是社会教育工作者面临的一个特殊挑战,他们感到无法保护自己。

相似文献

1
Persevering professionals: dilemmas of relationships and self-determination in work with people with intellectual disability - a multi-method study based on interpersonal process recall.坚持不懈的专业人士:智力障碍者工作中的关系和自我决定的困境——基于人际过程回忆的多方法研究。
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Jun;28(2):453-468. doi: 10.1177/17446295231154126. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
'It's our everyday life' - The perspectives of persons with intellectual disabilities in Norway.“这就是我们的日常生活”——挪威智障人士的观点。
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jun;24(2):143-157. doi: 10.1177/1744629518774174. Epub 2018 May 15.
3
Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with intellectual disabilities.管理互动中的关系自主性:智障人士。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Sep;32(5):1058-1066. doi: 10.1111/jar.12595. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Searching for a dynamic equilibrium in decision making: the voices of adults with mild intellectual disability and their significant others in Hong Kong.寻找决策中的动态平衡:来自香港轻度智力障碍成年人及其重要他人的声音。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5141-5151. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1925978. Epub 2021 May 25.
5
Duty of care and autonomy: how support workers managed the tension between protecting service users from risk and promoting their independence in a specialist group home.注意义务和自主权:在专门的团体家庭中,支持工作人员如何在保护服务使用者免受风险和促进其独立性之间管理这种紧张关系。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Sep;55(9):873-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01445.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
6
What's in it for me? The meaning of involvement in a self-advocacy group for six people with intellectual disabilities.这对我有什么好处?六位智障人士参与自我倡导团体的意义。
J Intellect Disabil. 2015 Sep;19(3):230-50. doi: 10.1177/1744629515571646. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
Intimate partner violence against women with intellectual disability: A relational framework for inclusive, trauma-informed social services.针对智障女性的亲密伴侣暴力:一个包容性的、以创伤为中心的社会服务关系框架。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5156-e5166. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13932. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
8
Knowing, being or doing? A comparative study on human service professionals' perceptions of quality in day-to-day encounters with clients and students with intellectual disabilities.知晓、存在还是行动?关于人类服务专业人员在日常与智障客户和学生接触中对质量认知的比较研究。
J Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;22(3):246-261. doi: 10.1177/1744629517694705. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
9
Living with support: Experiences of people with mild intellectual disability.在他人支持下生活:轻度智力残疾者的经历
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Mar;32(2):446-456. doi: 10.1111/jar.12542. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
10
Inputs and outcomes: what do staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities perceive they bring to and receive from their work-based relationships?投入与产出:智障人士服务机构的工作人员认为他们在工作关系中带来了什么,又从工作关系中获得了什么?
J Intellect Disabil. 2012 Dec;16(4):297-306. doi: 10.1177/1744629512466793.

引用本文的文献

1
Care needs of chronically ill patients with intellectual disabilities in Dutch general practice: patients' and providers' perspectives.荷兰全科医疗中慢性智力残疾患者的护理需求:患者和提供者的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11155-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions and understandings of self-determination in the context of relationships between people with intellectual disabilities and social care professionals.智障人士与社会护理专业人员关系背景下的自决观念与理解
Int J Dev Disabil. 2019 Jun 17;67(2):121-130. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2019.1623595.
2
Internet Use by People with Intellectual Disability: Exploring Digital Inequality-A Systematic Review.智力残疾人士的互联网使用:探索数字不平等——系统评价。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Aug;24(8):503-520. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0499. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
What Escapes Persuasion: Why Intellectual Disability Troubles 'Dependence' in Liberal Societies.难以被说服的人:为什么智力残疾在自由社会中引发“依赖”问题。
Med Anthropol. 2021 Feb-Mar;40(2):155-168. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2020.1805741. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
Partnership with social care professionals as a context for promoting self-determination among people with intellectual disabilities.与社会护理专业人员合作,以此作为促进智障人士自主决定权的背景。
Res Dev Disabil. 2020 Feb 7;99:103602. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103602.
5
Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with intellectual disabilities.管理互动中的关系自主性:智障人士。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Sep;32(5):1058-1066. doi: 10.1111/jar.12595. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
6
Leadership in interprofessional collaboration in health care.医疗保健领域跨专业协作中的领导力。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Jan 30;12:97-107. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S189199. eCollection 2019.
7
'It's our everyday life' - The perspectives of persons with intellectual disabilities in Norway.“这就是我们的日常生活”——挪威智障人士的观点。
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jun;24(2):143-157. doi: 10.1177/1744629518774174. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
The role of professionals in promoting independent living: Perspectives of self-advocates and front-line managers.专业人员在促进独立生活中的作用:自我倡导者和一线管理人员的观点。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Nov;31(6):1103-1112. doi: 10.1111/jar.12470. Epub 2018 May 15.
9
"I like talking to people on the computer": Outcomes of a home-based intervention to develop social media skills in youth with disabilities living in rural communities.“我喜欢在电脑上与人交流”:一项针对农村社区中残疾青年的基于家庭的干预措施,旨在培养其社交媒体技能的结果。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 May;76:110-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
10
The Limits of Autonomy: Ideals in Care for People with Learning Disabilities.自主的限度:为学习障碍者提供护理的理想模式
Med Anthropol. 2017 Nov-Dec;36(8):772-785. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2017.1367776. Epub 2017 Aug 24.