Department of Immunology, SA Pathology and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2021 Jan;203(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/cei.13508. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Anti-Ro60 is one of the most common and clinically important serum autoantibodies that has a number of diagnostic and predictive capabilities. Most diagnostic laboratories report this simply as a qualitative positive/negative result. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical and serological relevance of a novel subset of anti-Ro60 in patients who display low levels of anti-Ro60 (anti-Ro60 ). We retrospectively identified anti-Ro60 sera during a 12-month period at a major immunopathology diagnostic laboratory in Australia. These all were anti-Ro60-precipitin-positive on the diagnostic gold standard counter-immuno-electrophoresis (CIEP). Lineblot immunoassay was used to stratify patients into either anti-Ro60 or anti-Ro60 subsets. We compared the medical and laboratory parameters associated with each group. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and mass spectrometry techniques were used to analyse the serological and molecular basis behind the two subsets. Anti-Ro60 patients displayed less serological activity than anti-Ro60 patients with less intermolecular spreading, hypergammaglobulinaemia and less tendency to undergo anti-Ro60 isotype-switching than anti-Ro60 patients. Mass spectrometric typing of the anti-Ro60 subset showed restricted variable heavy chain subfamily usage and amino acid point mutations. This subset also displayed clinical relevance, being present in a number of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). We identify a novel anti-Ro60 patient subset that is distinct from anti-Ro60 patients serologically and molecularly. It is not clear whether they arise from common or separate origins; however, they probably have different developmental pathways to account for the stark difference in immunological maturity. We hence demonstrate significance to anti-Ro60 and justify accurate detection in the diagnostic laboratory.
抗 Ro60 是最常见和最重要的临床血清自身抗体之一,具有许多诊断和预测能力。大多数诊断实验室只是简单地报告定性的阳性/阴性结果。本研究的目的是检查在显示低水平抗 Ro60(抗 Ro60)的患者中新型抗 Ro60 亚组的临床和血清学相关性。我们在澳大利亚的一个主要免疫病理学诊断实验室回顾性地确定了在 12 个月期间的抗 Ro60 血清。所有这些在诊断金标准对流免疫电泳(CIEP)上都是抗 Ro60 沉淀阳性的。线印迹免疫分析用于将患者分层为抗 Ro60 或抗 Ro60 亚组。我们比较了与每个组相关的医学和实验室参数。酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和质谱技术用于分析两个亚组的血清学和分子基础。与抗 Ro60 患者相比,抗 Ro60 患者的血清学活性较低,分子间扩散较少,高丙种球蛋白血症较少,发生抗 Ro60 同种型转换的趋势也较低。抗 Ro60 亚组的质谱分型显示有限的可变重链亚家族使用和氨基酸点突变。该亚组还具有临床相关性,存在于许多系统性自身免疫性风湿病(SARD)患者中。我们确定了一种新型抗 Ro60 患者亚组,在血清学和分子水平上与抗 Ro60 患者不同。目前尚不清楚它们是否来自共同或单独的起源;然而,它们可能具有不同的发育途径,以解释免疫成熟度的明显差异。因此,我们证明了抗 Ro60 的重要性,并证明了在诊断实验室中进行准确检测的合理性。