Farrow Norma E, Raman Vignesh, Jawitz Oliver K, Voigt Soraya L, Tong Betty C, Harpole David H, D'Amico Thomas A
Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):996-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.055. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
Older patients are often considered high-risk surgical candidates for locally advanced esophageal cancer, and the benefit of surgery in this population is unclear. This national analysis examines the effect of age on esophagectomy outcomes and compares surgery versus chemoradiation in older patients.
The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with clinical stage II to III esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing surgery or definitive chemoradiation between 2004 and 2015. Restricted cubic splines were used to examine the relationship between age and survival after esophagectomy, and maximally selected rank statistics were used to identify an age at which survival worsened. We used Cox proportional hazard models including an interaction term between age and treatment to compare overall survival, as well as survival of patients receiving esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiation.
Of 17,495 patients, 11,680 underwent esophagectomy and 5815 received chemoradiation. Survival after esophagectomy worsened with increasing age and decreased considerably after age 73 (hazard ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.06, per increasing year after 73 versus hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01, per increasing year to 73; both P < .001). Chemoradiation was increasingly used over surgery as age increased. The interaction between age and treatment was significant, and a graph of this interaction demonstrated a survival benefit for surgery over chemoradiation at most ages, including octogenarians.
Survival worsens with age after esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, esophagectomy is associated with improved survival compared with definitive chemoradiation at most ages, including octogenarians. Esophagectomy may be considered over chemoradiation for patients who can tolerate surgery regardless of age.
老年患者通常被认为是局部晚期食管癌手术的高危候选者,手术对这一人群的益处尚不清楚。这项全国性分析研究了年龄对食管癌切除术后结局的影响,并比较了老年患者手术与放化疗的效果。
利用国家癌症数据库识别2004年至2015年间接受手术或根治性放化疗的临床II至III期食管腺癌患者。采用受限立方样条来研究年龄与食管癌切除术后生存率之间的关系,并使用最大选择秩统计量来确定生存率恶化的年龄。我们使用Cox比例风险模型,包括年龄与治疗之间的交互项,来比较总生存率,以及接受食管癌切除术与根治性放化疗患者的生存率。
在17495例患者中,11680例接受了食管癌切除术,5815例接受了放化疗。食管癌切除术后的生存率随着年龄增长而恶化,73岁后显著下降(风险比=1.05,95%置信区间,1.04 - 1.06,73岁后每增加一岁与风险比=1.01,95%置信区间,1.00 - 1.01,至73岁每增加一岁;两者P <.001)。随着年龄增加,放化疗的使用越来越多于手术。年龄与治疗之间的交互作用显著,该交互作用的图表显示,在大多数年龄,包括八旬老人,手术比放化疗具有生存益处。
局部晚期食管癌患者食管癌切除术后的生存率随年龄增长而恶化。然而,在大多数年龄,包括八旬老人,与根治性放化疗相比,食管癌切除术与生存率提高相关。对于能够耐受手术的患者,无论年龄大小,均可考虑行食管癌切除术而非放化疗。