College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China; The Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
J Environ Manage. 2020 Oct 15;272:110998. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110998. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
Environmental regulations affects the environmental quality of not only local areas but also surrounding regions. It remains unknown whether the effect of environmental regulations on the surrounding regions is free riding or pollution shelter. Based on the data from 2006 to 2018, the spatial correlation of PM in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH), Yangtze River Delta (YRD) and Pearl River Delta (PRD) urban agglomerations in China was examined in this study. In addition, the spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation on PM concentrations were explored while the socio-economic driving factors of the heterogeneity of pollution spillover were identified via SDM based STIRPAT framework. Results showed that the characteristics of PM concentrations spatial correlations varies from one urban agglomeration to another. This study revealed that the air pollution is affected by not only local environmental regulations, but also regulations implemented in surrounding cities. The PM concentration of BTH, YRD and PRD increased by 0.76, 0.147 and 0.109 for each unit increase in environmental regulation of surrounding cities, respectively. In fact, cities with loose regulation become the pollution shelters. The spatial spillover effects offset the improvement effects of local environmental regulations on the air quality. Furthermore, the comparison amongst three urban agglomerations showed that the spatial spillover effects of PM concentration in BTH and YRD are higher than that of PRD. This is attributed to differences in industrial structure, population density, economic development, FDI and geographical location. Therefore, the spatial spillover effects should be taken into consideration and joint regulation should be strengthened to address air pollution issues in urban aggregations.
环境法规不仅影响当地的环境质量,还影响周边地区。目前尚不清楚环境法规对周边地区的影响是搭便车还是污染避难所。本研究基于 2006 年至 2018 年的数据,检验了中国京津冀、长三角和珠三角城市群 PM 的空间相关性。此外,通过基于 STIRPAT 框架的 SDM 识别了污染溢出异质性的社会经济驱动因素,探讨了环境监管对 PM 浓度的空间溢出效应。结果表明,PM 浓度空间相关性的特征因城市群而异。本研究表明,空气污染不仅受到当地环境法规的影响,还受到周边城市实施的法规的影响。周边城市环境法规每增加一个单位,京津冀、长三角和珠三角的 PM 浓度分别增加 0.76、0.147 和 0.109。事实上,监管宽松的城市成为了污染避难所。空间溢出效应抵消了当地环境法规对空气质量的改善效应。此外,三个城市群的比较表明,京津冀和长三角的 PM 浓度的空间溢出效应高于珠三角。这归因于产业结构、人口密度、经济发展、外国直接投资和地理位置的差异。因此,应该考虑空间溢出效应,并加强联合监管,以解决城市群的空气污染问题。