Chief Medical Office, Cameroon Penitentiary Services, Cameroon.
UK Collaborating Centre for the WHO (Europe) Health in Prisons Programme, Health and Justice, ADT-J Division, Public Health England, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG, England, United Kingdom.
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
This study examined the extent, range and nature of the published literature, prison policies and technical guidance relating to the ethical conduct of health research in prisons in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Scoping Review.
We adhered to the five stages of the scoping review iterative process: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, and collating, summarizing and content analysis of polices. Disagreements around allocation of content were resolved through team discussion. We also appraised the quality of the included articles.
We included nine records that examined the ethical aspects of the conduct of health research in prisons in LMICs; eight of these were peer-reviewed publications, and one was a toolkit. Despite the unique vulnerabilities of this group, we could find no comprehensive guidelines on the ethical conduct of health research in prisons in LMICs.
The majority of the world's imprisoned populations are in LMICs, and they have considerable health needs. Research plays an important role in addressing these needs and in so doing, will contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. With regards to health research, imprisoned people in LMICs are 'left behind'; there is a lack of clear, prison-focused guidance and oversight to ensure high quality ethical health research so necessary in LMICs. There is an urgent need for prison health experts to work with health research ethics experts and custodial practitioners for procedural issues in the development of prison-specific ethical guidance for health research in LMICs aligned with international standards.
本研究旨在调查在中低收入国家(LMICs)的监狱中进行健康研究的伦理行为的已发表文献、监狱政策和技术指南的范围、种类和性质。
范围综述。
我们遵循范围综述迭代过程的五个阶段:确定研究问题、确定相关研究、研究选择、数据图表制作以及政策的整理、总结和内容分析。通过团队讨论解决了对内容分配的分歧。我们还评估了纳入文章的质量。
我们纳入了 9 份记录,这些记录考察了在 LMICs 的监狱中进行健康研究的伦理方面;其中 8 份是同行评审出版物,1 份是工具包。尽管这一群体存在独特的脆弱性,但我们在 LMICs 的监狱中找不到关于健康研究伦理行为的全面准则。
世界上大多数被监禁的人口都在 LMICs,他们有相当大的健康需求。研究在满足这些需求方面发挥了重要作用,并且有助于实现可持续发展目标。就健康研究而言,LMICs 的被监禁者被“忽视”;缺乏明确的、以监狱为重点的指导和监督,以确保在 LMICs 进行高质量的伦理健康研究。迫切需要监狱卫生专家与卫生研究伦理专家和监管人员合作,为 LMICs 中与国际标准一致的特定于监狱的健康研究伦理准则的制定解决程序性问题。