• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Balancing the Rights to Protection and Participation: A Call for Expanded Access to Ethically Conducted Correctional Health Research.平衡保护和参与的权利:呼吁扩大获得符合伦理的惩教卫生研究的机会。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):764-768. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4318-9. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
2
Walking the Line: Balancing Access to Research and Protecting Prisoners.走钢丝:平衡研究机会与保护囚犯权益
Med Law Rev. 2020 Feb 1;28(1):65-92. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwy041.
3
Ethical and Social Issues in Health Research Involving Incarcerated People.涉及被监禁者的健康研究中的伦理和社会问题。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(2A):18-28. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0053.
4
Providing Ethical and Humane Care to Hospitalized, Incarcerated Patients With COVID-19.为患有 COVID-19 的住院监禁患者提供合乎道德且人道的关怀。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jun;38(6):731-733. doi: 10.1177/1049909121994313. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
Nuremberg and the issue of wartime experiments on US prisoners. The Green Committee.
JAMA. 1996 Nov 27;276(20):1672-5.
6
Challenges and solutions for conducting research in correctional settings: the U.S. experience.在惩教环境中进行研究的挑战与对策:美国的经验。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013 May-Aug;36(3-4):304-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 15.
7
Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK.作为研究参与者的囚犯:英国的当前做法与态度
J Med Ethics. 2016 Apr;42(4):246-52. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101059. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
8
Palliative and end-of-life care in prisons: a content analysis of the literature.监狱中的姑息治疗与临终关怀:文献内容分析
Int J Prison Health. 2014;10(3):172-97. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-05-2013-0024.
9
HIV/AIDS research in correctional settings: perspectives on training needs from researchers and IRB members.惩教机构中的艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究:研究人员和机构审查委员会成员对培训需求的看法。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2014 Dec;26(6):565-76. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2014.26.6.565.
10
The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine of the Council of Europe.欧洲理事会《人权与生物医学公约》。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1997 Sep;7(3):259-76. doi: 10.1353/ken.1997.0023.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychiatric and legal considerations for ketamine treatment within prison settings.监狱环境中氯胺酮治疗的精神科和法律考量
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 18;15:1316108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1316108. eCollection 2024.
2
Recommendations for the Use of Telepsychology in Psychology-Law Practice and Research: A Statement by American Psychology-Law Society (APA Division 41).《美国心理法学协会(美国心理学会第41分会)关于在心理法学实践与研究中使用远程心理学的建议声明》
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2023 Aug;29(3):255-271. doi: 10.1037/law0000394. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Stakeholder-engaged research is necessary across the criminal-legal spectrum.在整个刑事法律领域,利益相关者参与的研究是必要的。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Nov 15;7(1):e5. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.501. eCollection 2023.
4
The Impact Of COVID-19 On The Health Of Incarcerated Older Adults In California State Prisons.《COVID-19 对加利福尼亚州监狱中老年囚犯健康的影响》。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Aug;41(8):1191-1201. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00132.
5
Interventions to reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviours among people in contact with the criminal justice system: A global systematic review.减少与刑事司法系统有接触者自杀念头和行为的干预措施:一项全球系统评价。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jan 14;44:101266. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101266. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Care for Incarcerated Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19.照料因 COVID-19 住院的监禁患者。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2094-2099. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06861-y. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
Ethical guidance for health research in prisons in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.中低收入国家监狱中卫生研究的伦理指导:范围综述。
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
8
Improving Health Equity for Women Involved in the Criminal Legal System.改善参与刑事法律系统的女性的健康公平状况。
Womens Health Issues. 2020 Sep-Oct;30(5):313-319. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
A systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners.针对老年囚犯社会护理需求的项目的系统综合评价。
Health Justice. 2019 May 27;7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40352-019-0090-0.
10
The Share Project: Building Capacity of Justice-Involved Individuals, Policymakers, and Researchers to Collectively Transform Health Care Delivery.“共享项目”:提升有犯罪前科的个人、政策制定者和研究人员的能力,以共同推动医疗服务的变革。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(1):113-115. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304750. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's involvement in clinical trials: historical perspective and future implications.女性参与临床试验:历史视角与未来影响。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016 Jan-Mar;14(1):708. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.01.708. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
2
Stress and Hardship after Prison.出狱后的压力与困境
AJS. 2015 Mar;120(5):1512-47. doi: 10.1086/681301.
3
The Rationalization of Unethical Research: Revisionist Accounts of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the New Zealand "Unfortunate Experiment".不道德研究的合理化:对塔斯基吉梅毒研究和新西兰“不幸实验”的修正主义记述
Am J Public Health. 2015 Oct;105(10):e12-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302720. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
4
Methadone continuation versus forced withdrawal on incarceration in a combined US prison and jail: a randomised, open-label trial.美国监狱联合监禁中,美沙酮维持治疗与强制戒毒的对比:一项随机、开放标签试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jul 25;386(9991):350-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62338-2. Epub 2015 May 28.
5
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
6
Co-occurring substance use and mental disorders in the criminal justice system: a new frontier of clinical practice and research.刑事司法系统中并发的物质使用与精神障碍:临床实践与研究的新前沿。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015 Mar;38(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/prj0000135.
7
The state of research funding from the National Institutes of Health for criminal justice health research.美国国立卫生研究院用于刑事司法健康研究的研究资金状况。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 3;162(5):345-52. doi: 10.7326/M14-2161.
8
Health outcomes and retention in care following release from prison for patients of an urban post-incarceration transitions clinic.城市监禁后过渡诊所患者出狱后的健康状况及护理持续情况。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014 Aug;25(3):1139-52. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0139.
9
Initiation of buprenorphine during incarceration and retention in treatment upon release.在监禁期间开始使用丁丙诺啡,并在释放后保持治疗。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Aug;45(2):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
10
Coercion in research: are prisoners the only vulnerable population?研究中的胁迫:囚犯是唯一的弱势群体吗?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(1):8-13.

平衡保护和参与的权利:呼吁扩大获得符合伦理的惩教卫生研究的机会。

Balancing the Rights to Protection and Participation: A Call for Expanded Access to Ethically Conducted Correctional Health Research.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Psychology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):764-768. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4318-9. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-018-4318-9
PMID:29404944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5910351/
Abstract

Incarcerated individuals, over 95% of whom are eventually released, experience high burdens of chronic disease and behavioral health and social risk factors. Understanding the health needs of this population is critical to ensuring that general medicine physicians in prisons and in the community are adequately prepared to meet those needs. However, people in prison are significantly underrepresented in health research. In response to historical exploitation of prisoners in medical experimentation, federal guidelines appropriately require additional oversight for, and limit the scope of, research in prisons. Yet, according to a 2006 Institute of Medicine report, these requirements have produced inconsistent local regulations that often limit opportunities for incarcerated individuals to participate in research, and can slow the development of innovative medical interventions to improve their health. In this article, we describe the historical context surrounding regulations on research involving individuals in prison, the harms that can arise from excessive limitations to research in such settings, and the benefits of greater access to ethically conducted research in prison. We conclude with recommended actions that can be taken by general medicine researchers, correctional leaders, and policymakers to achieve consistent access to health research for incarcerated populations.

摘要

被监禁者中,超过 95%的人最终会被释放,他们承受着严重的慢性疾病和行为健康以及社会风险因素的负担。了解这一人群的健康需求对于确保监狱和社区中的普通内科医生能够充分满足这些需求至关重要。然而,监狱中的人在健康研究中代表性严重不足。为了回应历史上对囚犯在医学实验中的剥削,联邦指南适当要求对监狱中的研究进行额外的监督,并限制研究的范围。然而,根据 2006 年美国医学研究所的一份报告,这些要求产生了不一致的地方规定,这些规定常常限制了囚犯参与研究的机会,并可能减缓创新医疗干预措施的发展,以改善他们的健康状况。在本文中,我们描述了涉及监狱中个人的研究监管的历史背景,过度限制此类环境中的研究可能带来的危害,以及在监狱中进行更多符合伦理的研究的好处。我们最后提出了普通内科医生研究人员、惩教领导人和政策制定者可以采取的建议性行动,以确保被监禁人群能够获得一致的健康研究机会。