Suppr超能文献

1型(胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病临床表现时血清胰岛素自身抗体、胰岛细胞抗体与柯萨奇B4病毒及腮腺炎病毒特异性抗体之间的关系。

Relationship between serum insulin autoantibodies, islet cell antibodies and Coxsackie-B4 and mumps virus-specific antibodies at the clinical manifestation of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes.

作者信息

Karjalainen J, Knip M, Hyöty H, Leinikki P, Ilonen J, Käär M L, Akerblom H K

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University of Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 1988 Mar;31(3):146-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00276847.

Abstract

In order to elucidate the possible relationship between insulin autoantibodies (IAA), conventional (ICA-IgG) and complement-fixing (CF-ICA) islet cell antibodies and Coxsackie-B4 and mumps virus-specific antibodies (IgG, IgM and IgA classes), we studied 194 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes. Sixty-one (31.4%) of the subjects were IAA-positive at diagnosis and 73.8% (45/61) of these also had ICA-IgG compared to 51.1% (68/113, p less than 0.01) of IAA-negative children. CF-ICA showed no significant association with IAA. The levels of IAA were significantly higher in the patients with ICA-IgG compared to those without [5.9 +/- 1.6% (SEM) vs 2.5 +/- 0.3%, p less than 0.01]. The patients positive for IAA were younger at diagnosis than the IAA-negative ones; (7.1 +/- 0.5 vs 9.3 +/- 0.3 years, p less than 0.001) and this was also true for ICA-IgG-positive children (8.1 +/- 0.4 vs 9.4 +/- 0.5 years, p less than 0.05) in comparison to ICA-IgG-negative subjects. No significant associations were found between IAA or ICA on the one hand and a positive family history of Type 1 diabetes or metabolic derangements at diagnosis on the other. Subjects negative for ICA were more frequently positive for mumps virus specific IgG antibodies than the ICA-positive patients (50/80 vs 53/111, p less than 0.05), and Coxsackie-B4 virus-specific IgA antibodies were more common in the CF-ICA-negative than the CF-ICA-positive children (53/111 vs 29/80, p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为了阐明胰岛素自身抗体(IAA)、传统胰岛细胞抗体(ICA-IgG)和补体结合胰岛细胞抗体(CF-ICA)与柯萨奇B4病毒及腮腺炎病毒特异性抗体(IgG、IgM和IgA类)之间可能存在的关系,我们研究了194例新诊断的1型(胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病儿童和青少年。61例(31.4%)受试者在诊断时IAA呈阳性,其中73.8%(45/61)同时也有ICA-IgG,而IAA阴性儿童中这一比例为51.1%(68/113,p<0.01)。CF-ICA与IAA无显著相关性。与无ICA-IgG的患者相比,有ICA-IgG的患者IAA水平显著更高[5.9±1.6%(SEM)对2.5±0.3%,p<0.01]。IAA阳性的患者诊断时年龄比IAA阴性患者小;(7.1±0.5对9.3±0.3岁,p<0.001),与ICA-IgG阴性受试者相比,ICA-IgG阳性儿童也是如此(8.1±0.4对9.4±0.5岁,p<0.05)。一方面,IAA或ICA与1型糖尿病家族史阳性或诊断时的代谢紊乱之间未发现显著相关性。ICA阴性的受试者腮腺炎病毒特异性IgG抗体阳性的频率高于ICA阳性患者(50/80对53/111,p<0.05),柯萨奇B4病毒特异性IgA抗体在CF-ICA阴性儿童中比CF-ICA阳性儿童更常见(53/111对29/80,p<0.05)。(摘要截于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验