• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队合作中的人工社会智能:团队特质如何影响复杂任务中的人机动态。

Artificial social intelligence in teamwork: how team traits influence human-AI dynamics in complex tasks.

作者信息

Bendell Rhyse, Williams Jessica, Fiore Stephen M, Jentsch Florian

机构信息

Cognitive Sciences Laboratory, Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.

Department of Philosophy, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2025 Feb 17;12:1487883. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1487883. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2025.1487883
PMID:40034799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11873349/
Abstract

This study examines the integration of Artificial Social Intelligence (ASI) into human teams, focusing on how ASI can enhance teamwork processes in complex tasks. Teams of three participants collaborated with ASI advisors designed to exhibit Artificial Theory of Mind (AToM) while engaged in an interdependent task. A profiling model was used to categorize teams based on their taskwork and teamwork potential and study how these influenced perceptions of team processes and ASI advisors. Results indicated that teams with higher taskwork or teamwork potential had more positive perceptions of their team processes, with those high in both dimensions showing the most favorable views. However, team performance significantly mediated these perceptions, suggesting that objective outcomes strongly influence subjective impressions of teammates. Notably, perceptions of the ASI advisors were not significantly affected by team performance but were positively correlated with higher taskwork and teamwork potential. The study highlights the need for ASI systems to be adaptable and responsive to the specific traits of human teams to be perceived as effective teammates.

摘要

本研究考察了人工社会智能(ASI)融入人类团队的情况,重点关注ASI如何在复杂任务中增强团队协作过程。由三名参与者组成的团队与旨在展现人工心智理论(AToM)的ASI顾问合作,共同参与一项相互依存的任务。一个剖析模型被用于根据团队的任务工作和团队协作潜力对团队进行分类,并研究这些因素如何影响对团队过程和ASI顾问的认知。结果表明,具有较高任务工作或团队协作潜力的团队对其团队过程有更积极的认知,在两个维度上都较高的团队表现出最有利的看法。然而,团队绩效显著调节了这些认知,这表明客观结果强烈影响对队友的主观印象。值得注意的是,对ASI顾问的认知并未受到团队绩效的显著影响,但与较高的任务工作和团队协作潜力呈正相关。该研究强调,ASI系统需要具备适应性,并能对人类团队的特定特征做出响应,才能被视为有效的队友。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cd2/11873349/4ff87b3e6f79/frobt-12-1487883-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cd2/11873349/7fea62b17964/frobt-12-1487883-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cd2/11873349/4ff87b3e6f79/frobt-12-1487883-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cd2/11873349/7fea62b17964/frobt-12-1487883-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cd2/11873349/4ff87b3e6f79/frobt-12-1487883-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial social intelligence in teamwork: how team traits influence human-AI dynamics in complex tasks.团队合作中的人工社会智能:团队特质如何影响复杂任务中的人机动态。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Feb 17;12:1487883. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1487883. eCollection 2025.
2
Individual and team profiling to support theory of mind in artificial social intelligence.个体和团队分析在人工社会智能中的心理理论支持
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 2;14(1):12635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63122-8.
3
Measuring teamwork and taskwork of community-based "teams" delivering life-saving health interventions in rural Zambia: a qualitative study.测量赞比亚农村地区提供救生健康干预措施的以社区为基础的“团队”的团队合作和任务分工:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jun 27;13:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-84.
4
Exploring how healthcare teams balance the neurodynamics of autonomous and collaborative behaviors: a proof of concept.探索医疗团队如何平衡自主行为与协作行为的神经动力学:概念验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:932468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.932468. eCollection 2022.
5
Self-beliefs, Transactive Memory Systems, and Collective Identification in Teams: Articulating the Socio-Cognitive Underpinnings of COHUMAIN.团队中的自我信念、交互记忆系统与集体认同:阐明COHUMAIN的社会认知基础
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;17(2):217-247. doi: 10.1111/tops.12681. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
6
Establishing Human Observer Criterion in Evaluating Artificial Social Intelligence Agents in a Search and Rescue Task.在搜索救援任务中评估人工社会智能体时建立人类观察者标准
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;17(2):349-373. doi: 10.1111/tops.12648. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
7
AI-teaming: Redefining collaboration in the digital era.人工智能团队协作:数字时代的重新定义。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Aug;58:101837. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101837. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
8
Human-AI teams-Challenges for a team-centered AI at work.人机协作团队——工作中以团队为中心的人工智能面临的挑战。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Sep 27;6:1252897. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1252897. eCollection 2023.
9
Complex Problem Solving in Teams: The Impact of Collective Orientation on Team Process Demands.团队中的复杂问题解决:集体导向对团队过程要求的影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 29;8:1730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01730. eCollection 2017.
10
Distinguishing between taskwork and teamwork planning in teams: relations with coordination and interpersonal processes.区分团队中的任务工作和团队工作规划:与协调和人际过程的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 May;99(3):423-36. doi: 10.1037/a0034625. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual and team profiling to support theory of mind in artificial social intelligence.个体和团队分析在人工社会智能中的心理理论支持
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 2;14(1):12635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63122-8.
2
Supporting Artificial Social Intelligence With Theory of Mind.用心理理论支持人工社会智能。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 28;5:750763. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.750763. eCollection 2022.
3
Prospects for Augmenting Team Interactions with Real-Time Coordination-Based Measures in Human-Autonomy Teams.增强人机团队中基于实时协调的措施以增强团队交互的前景。
Top Cogn Sci. 2024 Jul;16(3):391-429. doi: 10.1111/tops.12606. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Human-Autonomy Teaming: Definitions, Debates, and Directions.人机协作:定义、争论与方向
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:589585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589585. eCollection 2021.
5
Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature.人机协作:实证文献综述与分析。
Hum Factors. 2022 Aug;64(5):904-938. doi: 10.1177/0018720820960865. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Leading Teams in the Digital Age: Four Perspectives on Technology and What They Mean for Leading Teams.数字时代的领导团队:关于技术的四种观点及其对领导团队的意义。
Leadersh Q. 2020 Feb;31(1). doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
Knowing me, knowing you: theory of mind in AI.知己知彼:人工智能中的心理理论。
Psychol Med. 2020 May;50(7):1057-1061. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000835. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming.与合成队友协作:对人机协作的深入了解。
Hum Factors. 2018 Mar;60(2):262-273. doi: 10.1177/0018720817743223. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
9
Technology as Teammate: Examining the Role of External Cognition in Support of Team Cognitive Processes.作为伙伴的技术:审视外部认知在支持团队认知过程中的作用
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 7;7:1531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01531. eCollection 2016.
10
Toward understanding social cues and signals in human-robot interaction: effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior.理解人机交互中的社会线索和信号:机器人注视和空间行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 27;4:859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00859. eCollection 2013.