• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Minitek system.

作者信息

Holmes B, Humphry P S

机构信息

Computer Identification Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, London, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Bacteriol. 1988 Feb;64(2):151-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb02735.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb02735.x
PMID:3286596
Abstract

A total of 417 strains (361 Enterobacteriaceae, 56 Vibrionaceae) was examined in all the available Minitek system tests. The results were processed through four successive identification schemes devised by the manufacturer and the proportion of strains correctly identified, not identified or incorrectly identified determined for each scheme. From the results, a probability matrix was constructed incorporating all 35 Minitek tests. Test results for each strain were then processed through this matrix to determine its success in identification. From the matrix the order of separating value of the tests was determined. Forty-three of the strains were each tested three times to assess the level of test reproducibility; the corrected error rate was 0.85%.

摘要

相似文献

1
Identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Minitek system.
J Appl Bacteriol. 1988 Feb;64(2):151-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb02735.x.
2
Evaluation of Mast-ID 15 system for identifying Enterobacteriaceae, some Vibrionaceae, and Acinetobacter.用于鉴定肠杆菌科、部分弧菌科和不动杆菌的Mast-ID 15系统的评估
J Clin Pathol. 1987 Oct;40(10):1168-73. doi: 10.1136/jcp.40.10.1168.
3
Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.评估Phoenix 100 ID/AST系统和NID鉴定板对肠杆菌科、弧菌科以及常见分离出的非肠道革兰氏阴性杆菌的鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar;44(3):928-33. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.928-933.2006.
4
Evaluation of a small "conventional" identification system for fermentative gramnegative rods using a computerized data base.使用计算机数据库对一种用于发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的小型“传统”鉴定系统进行评估。
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1987 Oct;266(3-4):370-8. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(87)80217-1.
5
Evaluation of the L-pyrrolidonyl-beta-naphthylamide hydrolysis test for the differentiation of members of the families Enterobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae.用于区分肠杆菌科和弧菌科成员的L-吡咯烷酮基-β-萘酰胺水解试验的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1946-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1946-1948.1993.
6
Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the API 20E system.使用API 20E系统鉴定肠杆菌科细菌。
J Clin Pathol. 1978 Jan;31(1):22-30. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.1.22.
7
A revised probability matrix for the identification of gram-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped, fermentative bacteria.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性、需氧、杆状、发酵型细菌的修订概率矩阵。
J Gen Microbiol. 1986 Nov;132(11):3113-35. doi: 10.1099/00221287-132-11-3113.
8
Differentiation of Enterobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae by a micromethod for determination of carbon substrate assimilation.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1984 Dec;258(2-3):187-97. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(84)80037-1.
9
Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的Minitek系统评估
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct;28(4):668-71. doi: 10.1128/am.28.4.668-671.1974.
10
Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of nonfermentative and nonenteric fermentative Gram-negative bacteria.用于鉴定非发酵及非肠道发酵革兰氏阴性菌的Minitek系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):509-16. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.509-516.1980.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of identification of Enterobacteriaceae by API 20E and Sensititre Autoidentification System.采用API 20E和Sensititre自动鉴定系统对肠杆菌科细菌进行鉴定的比较。
J Clin Pathol. 1989 Jun;42(6):649-52. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.6.649.