• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小心,他很危险!对据称具有威胁性的人的选择性视觉注意的皮层电活动指标。

Watch out, he's dangerous! Electrocortical indicators of selective visual attention to allegedly threatening persons.

作者信息

Bublatzky Florian, Guerra Pedro, Alpers Georg W

机构信息

Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Germany; University of Granada, Department of Personality, Spain; Clinical Psychology and Biological Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Germany.

University of Granada, Department of Personality, Spain.

出版信息

Cortex. 2020 Oct;131:164-178. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.009
PMID:32866901
Abstract

The face of a friend indicates safety, the face of a foe can indicate threat. Here, we examine the effects of verbal instructions ('beware of this person') on the perception of unknown persons. Focusing on visual attention, face identity and facial expression information is examined during instructed threat-of-shock or safety. However, shocks never occurred. Participants quickly acquired instructed threat associations, and electrocortical processing differentiated threat- from safe-identities as well as emotional and neutral facial expressions. Importantly, face encoding varied as a joint function of identity and facial expression, as revealed by pronounced N170 amplitudes to smiling threat-identities. Moreover, instructions readily reversed previously learned affective associations leading to attention allocation and memory updating as reflected by N170, EPN and P3 amplitudes toward new threat-identities displaying angry expressions. These findings demonstrate that person perception flexibly re-adjusts according to minimal information. Intriguingly, perceptual biases occur even though the anticipated aversive consequence does not occur, with implications for research on stereotyping and anxious psychopathology.

摘要

朋友的面孔代表安全,敌人的面孔则意味着威胁。在此,我们研究言语指令(“小心这个人”)对未知人物认知的影响。聚焦于视觉注意力,在被告知有电击威胁或安全的情况下,对面部身份和面部表情信息进行研究。然而,电击从未发生。参与者迅速获得了被告知的威胁关联,并且脑电皮层处理能够区分威胁身份与安全身份,以及情绪化和中性的面部表情。重要的是,面部编码因身份和面部表情的联合作用而有所不同,这表现为对微笑的威胁身份有明显的N170波幅。此外,指令能够轻易逆转先前习得的情感关联,从而导致注意力分配和记忆更新,这通过N170、EPN和P3波幅对显示愤怒表情的新威胁身份的反应得以体现。这些发现表明,人物认知会根据极少的信息灵活地重新调整。有趣的是,即使预期的厌恶后果并未出现,仍会产生感知偏差,这对刻板印象和焦虑心理病理学的研究具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Watch out, he's dangerous! Electrocortical indicators of selective visual attention to allegedly threatening persons.小心,他很危险!对据称具有威胁性的人的选择性视觉注意的皮层电活动指标。
Cortex. 2020 Oct;131:164-178. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.糟糕的是:社交焦虑中对愤怒面孔的偏向会干扰身份识别过程。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:136-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
3
Are event-related potentials to dynamic facial expressions of emotion related to individual differences in the accuracy of processing facial expressions and identity?与动态面部表情情绪相关的事件相关电位是否与面部表情和身份识别准确性的个体差异有关?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Apr;17(2):364-380. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0484-6.
4
Face-to-face: Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing.面对面:感知到的个人相关性会增强面部处理能力。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 May 1;12(5):811-822. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx001.
5
Impairments of emotional face processing in schizophrenia patients: Evidence from P100, N170 and P300 ERP components in a sample of auditory hallucinators.精神分裂症患者情绪面孔加工障碍:听觉幻听样本中 P100、N170 和 P300 ERP 成分的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Dec;134:120-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
6
Attention and emotion: An integrative review of emotional face processing as a function of attention.注意力与情感:作为注意力功能的情绪面孔加工的综合综述
Cortex. 2020 Sep;130:362-386. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
7
Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological Responding.逆转对安全的威胁:面部表情与指示性威胁的不一致调节意识知觉但不影响生理反应。
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 13;10:2091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02091. eCollection 2019.
8
Social threat and safety learning in individuals with adverse childhood experiences: electrocortical evidence on face processing, recognition, and working memory.经历过不良童年经历的个体的社会威胁和安全学习:面部处理、识别和工作记忆的电皮质证据。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Oct 28;13(2):2135195. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2135195. eCollection 2022.
9
Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.早期视觉皮层中对情感面孔和复杂国际情感图片系统(IAPS)图像的注意偏向遵循情绪线索提取。
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:254-266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.052. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
10
Contextual source information modulates neural face processing in the absence of conscious recognition: A threat-of-shock study.语境源信息调节无意识识别条件下的神经面孔加工:休克威胁研究。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Oct;174:107280. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107280. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural dynamics of personality trait perception and interaction preferences.人格特质感知与互动偏好的神经动力学
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 12;14(1):30455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76423-9.
2
Independence Threat or Interdependence Threat? The Focusing Effect on Social or Physical Threat Modulates Brain Activity.独立威胁还是相互依赖威胁?对社会或身体威胁的聚焦效应调节大脑活动。
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 9;14(4):368. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040368.
3
Spatial navigation under threat: aversive apprehensions improve route retracing in higher versus lower trait anxious individuals.
面临威胁时的空间导航:在高特质焦虑与低特质焦虑个体中,厌恶忧虑改善路线回溯能力。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 11;14:1166594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166594. eCollection 2023.
4
When attitudes and beliefs get in the way of shared decision-making: A mediation analysis of participation preference.当态度和信念阻碍共同决策时:参与偏好的中介分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):740-751. doi: 10.1111/hex.13699. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Social threat and safety learning in individuals with adverse childhood experiences: electrocortical evidence on face processing, recognition, and working memory.经历过不良童年经历的个体的社会威胁和安全学习:面部处理、识别和工作记忆的电皮质证据。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Oct 28;13(2):2135195. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2135195. eCollection 2022.
6
Aversive anticipations modulate electrocortical correlates of decision-making and reward reversal learning, but not behavioral performance.厌恶预期调节决策和奖励反转学习的皮层电活动相关指标,但不影响行为表现。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Aug 5;16:908454. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.908454. eCollection 2022.
7
The mere sight of loved ones does not inhibit psychophysiological defense mechanisms when threatened.当受到威胁时,仅仅看到所爱的人并不会抑制心理生理防御机制。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 15;12(1):2515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06514-y.
8
Electrophysiological responses to negative evaluative person-knowledge: Effects of individual differences.对负性评价性个体知识的电生理反应:个体差异的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;21(4):822-836. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00894-w. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
9
Verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones.言语威胁学习不会放过亲人。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 9;11(1):5469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84921-3.