Suppr超能文献

学校健康促进中行政管理者参与的建议:范围综述。

Recommendations for Administrators' Involvement in School-Based Health Promotion: A Scoping Review.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

Department of Educational Studies, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;17(17):6249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176249.

Abstract

School administrator involvement is recognized as a key factor in the extent to which school health promotion programs and initiatives are successfully implemented. The aims of this scoping review are to: (a) Identify existing documents that contain recommendations regarding the involvement of school administrators in school-based health promotion; (b) distill and summarize the recommendations; (c) examine differences in the recommendations by targeted professional level, professional group, health promotion content focus, and by whether the recommendations are evidence-based or opinion-based; and (d) evaluate the research informing the recommendations. We drew upon the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to conduct the review. Our team conducted a comprehensive literature search with no date or geographic restrictions from January 2018 through April 2018 using four electronic databases: Academic Search Complete, Google Scholar, Physical Education Index, and PubMed. Eligibility criteria included any online documents, in English, that contained recommendations targeting school administrators' (e.g., principals, assistant principals, superintendents) involvement (e.g., support, endorsement, advocacy) in school health programming (e.g., physical activity, nutrition, wellness). The search yielded a total of 1225 records, which we screened by title, then by abstract, and finally by full text, resulting in 61 records that met inclusion criteria. Data (e.g., recommendations, targeted contexts, targeted administrators) from these records were extracted for a content analysis. Included records contained 80 distinct recommendations, which we summarized into three themes (Collaboration, Advocacy, and Support) using a content analysis. Separate content analyses revealed no qualitative differences in the recommendations by professional level, professional group, or content focus, or by whether the recommendations were evidence-based or opinion-based. Twenty-one of the included records were peer-reviewed research articles. Using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), we appraised qualitative research articles the highest and mixed methods research articles the lowest. This review provides a basis for future research and professional practice aiming to increase school administrators' involvement in school-based health promotion.

摘要

学校管理人员的参与被认为是学校健康促进计划和举措成功实施的关键因素。本范围综述的目的是:(a) 确定现有包含有关学校管理人员参与学校健康促进建议的文件;(b) 提炼和总结建议;(c) 按目标专业水平、专业群体、健康促进内容重点以及建议是否基于证据或意见进行差异分析;(d) 评估为建议提供信息的研究。我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南进行了综述。我们的团队在 2018 年 1 月至 4 月期间进行了全面的文献搜索,没有日期或地域限制,使用了四个电子数据库:学术搜索综合版、Google Scholar、体育教育索引和 PubMed。入选标准包括任何以英语撰写的在线文件,这些文件包含针对学校管理人员(例如校长、副校长、总监)参与(例如支持、认可、倡导)学校健康计划(例如体育活动、营养、健康)的建议。搜索共产生了 1225 条记录,我们通过标题、摘要和全文进行筛选,最终有 61 条记录符合入选标准。从这些记录中提取数据(例如建议、目标背景、目标管理人员)进行内容分析。包括的记录包含 80 条不同的建议,我们使用内容分析将其总结为三个主题(协作、倡导和支持)。单独的内容分析表明,按专业水平、专业群体或内容重点、建议是否基于证据或意见,建议没有质量差异。21 篇包括的记录是同行评议的研究文章。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT),我们对定性研究文章进行了最高评价,对混合方法研究文章进行了最低评价。本综述为旨在增加学校管理人员参与学校健康促进的未来研究和专业实践提供了基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验