Jassal Sarbjit V, Larkina Maria, Jager Kitty J, Murtagh Fliss E M, O'Hare Ann M, Hanafusa Norio, Morgenstern Hal, Port Friedrich K, McCullough Keith, Pisoni Ronald, Tentori Francesca, Perlman Rachel, Swartz Richard D
University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich.
CMAJ. 2020 Aug 31;192(35):E995-E1002. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191631.
Decisions about dialysis for advanced kidney disease are often strongly shaped by sociocultural and system-level factors rather than the priorities and values of individual patients. We examined international variation in the uptake of conservative approaches to the care of patients with advanced kidney disease, in particular discontinuation of dialysis.
We employed an observational cohort study design using data collected from patients maintained on long-term hemodialysis between 1996 and 2015 in facilities across 12 developed countries participating in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). The main outcome was discontinuation of dialysis therapy. We analyzed the association between several patient characteristics and time to dialysis discontinuation by country and phase of study entry.
A total of 259 343 DOPPS patients contributed data to the study, of whom 48 519 (18.7%) died during the study period. Of the decedents, 5808 (12.0%) discontinued dialysis before death. Rates of discontinuation were higher within the first few months after initiation of dialysis, among older adults, among those with a greater number of comorbidities and among those living in an institution. After adjustment for age, sex, dialysis duration, diabetes and dialysis era, rates of discontinuation were highest in Canada, the United States and Australia/New Zealand (33.8, 31.4 and 21.5 per 1000/yr, respectively) and lowest in Japan and Italy (< 0.1 per 1000/yr). Crude discontinuation rates were highest in dialysis facilities that were more likely to offer comprehensive conservative renal care to older adults.
We found persistent international variation in average rates of dialysis discontinuation not explained by differences in patient case-mix. These differences may reflect physician-, facility- and society-level differences in clinical practice. There may be opportunities for international cross-collaboration to improve support for patients with end-stage renal disease who prefer a more conservative approach.
晚期肾病透析决策往往受社会文化和系统层面因素的强烈影响,而非个体患者的优先事项和价值观。我们研究了晚期肾病患者保守治疗方法(尤其是停止透析)应用情况的国际差异。
我们采用观察性队列研究设计,使用1996年至2015年期间参与透析结果和实践模式研究(DOPPS)的12个发达国家的设施中接受长期血液透析患者的数据。主要结局是透析治疗的停止。我们按国家和研究入组阶段分析了几个患者特征与透析停止时间之间的关联。
共有259343名DOPPS患者为该研究提供了数据,其中48519名(18.7%)在研究期间死亡。在这些死者中,5808名(12.0%)在死亡前停止了透析。透析开始后的头几个月内、老年人、合并症较多者以及住在机构中的患者停止透析的比例较高。在调整年龄、性别、透析时间、糖尿病和透析时代后,加拿大、美国和澳大利亚/新西兰的停止透析率最高(分别为每年每1000人中有33.8、31.4和21.5人),日本和意大利最低(每年每1000人<0.1人)。在更有可能为老年人提供全面保守肾脏护理的透析设施中,粗停止率最高。
我们发现透析停止的平均率存在持续的国际差异,这无法用患者病例组合的差异来解释。这些差异可能反映了临床实践中医生、设施和社会层面的差异。对于更喜欢更保守方法的终末期肾病患者,可能存在国际跨合作以改善支持的机会。