Klemeš Jiří Jaromír, Fan Yee Van, Jiang Peng
Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Systems Science, Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore, 138632, Singapore.
Energy (Oxf). 2020 Nov 15;211:118701. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118701. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
The still escalating COVID-19 pandemic also has a substantial impact on energy structure, requirements and related emissions. The consumption is unavoidable and receives a lower priority in the critical situation. However, as the pandemic continues, the impacts on energy and environment should be assessed and possibly reduced. This study aims to provide an overview of invested energy sources and environmental footprints in fighting the COVID-19. The required energy and resources consumption of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and testing kits have been discussed. The protecting efficiency returned on environmental footprint invested for masks has been further explored. The main observation pinpointed is that with a proper design standard, material selection and user guideline, reusable PPE could be an effective option with lower energy consumption/environmental footprint. Additional escalated energy consumption for aseptic and disinfection has been assessed. This includes the energy stemming from emergency and later managed supply chains. The outcomes emphasised that diversifying solutions to achieve the needed objective is a vital strategy to improve the susceptibility and provide higher flexibility in minimising the environmental footprints. However, more comprehensive research proof for the alternative solution (e.g. reusable option) towards low energy consumption without compromise on the effectiveness should be offered and advocated.
仍在不断升级的新冠疫情也对能源结构、需求及相关排放产生了重大影响。在危急情况下,能源消耗不可避免且优先级较低。然而,随着疫情持续,应评估并尽可能减少其对能源和环境的影响。本研究旨在概述抗击新冠疫情中投入的能源来源及环境足迹。讨论了个人防护装备(PPE)和检测试剂盒所需的能源及资源消耗。进一步探讨了为口罩投入的环境足迹所带来的防护效率。主要观察结果表明,通过适当的设计标准、材料选择和用户指南,可重复使用的个人防护装备可能是一种能耗/环境足迹较低的有效选择。评估了无菌和消毒方面额外增加的能源消耗。这包括来自应急及后续管理供应链的能源。研究结果强调,采用多样化解决方案以实现所需目标是提高适应性并在最小化环境足迹方面提供更高灵活性的关键策略。然而,应提供并倡导更多关于替代解决方案(如可重复使用选项)在不影响有效性的情况下实现低能耗的全面研究证据。