Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Mar;68(1):60-74. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.424. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of clinical information on the accuracy, timeliness, reporting confidence and clinical relevance of the radiology report.
A systematic review of studies that investigated a link between primary communication of clinical information to the radiologist and the resultant report was conducted. Relevant studies were identified by a comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE). Studies were screened using pre-defined criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies. Synthesis of findings was narrative. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
There were 21 studies which met the inclusion criteria, of which 20 were included in our review following quality assessment. Sixteen studies investigated the effect of clinical information on reporting accuracy, three studies investigated the effect of clinical information on reporting confidence, three studies explored the impact of clinical information on clinical relevance, and two studies investigated the impact of clinical information on reporting timeliness. Some studies explored multiple outcomes. Studies concluded that clinical information improved interpretation accuracy, clinical relevance and reporting confidence; however, reporting time was not substantially affected by the addition of clinical information.
The findings of this review suggest clinical information has a positive impact on the radiology report. It is in the best interests of radiologists to communicate the importance of clinical information to reporting via the creation of criteria standards to guide the requesting practices of medical imaging referrers. Further work is recommended to establish these criteria standards.
本研究旨在探讨临床信息对放射科报告的准确性、及时性、报告信心和临床相关性的影响。
对调查临床信息向放射科医生的初步沟通与报告结果之间联系的研究进行了系统综述。通过对电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus 和 EMBASE)的全面搜索,确定了相关研究。使用预先设定的标准筛选研究。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)的准实验研究批判性评估清单评估方法学质量。使用叙述性方法综合研究结果。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南报告结果。
共有 21 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 20 项经过质量评估后纳入综述。16 项研究调查了临床信息对报告准确性的影响,3 项研究调查了临床信息对报告信心的影响,3 项研究探讨了临床信息对临床相关性的影响,2 项研究调查了临床信息对报告及时性的影响。一些研究探讨了多个结果。研究结论表明,临床信息提高了解释准确性、临床相关性和报告信心;然而,报告时间并没有因添加临床信息而受到实质性影响。
本综述的研究结果表明,临床信息对放射科报告有积极影响。为了放射科医生的最佳利益,通过制定标准来指导医学影像转诊者的请求实践,向报告传达临床信息的重要性。建议进一步开展工作以制定这些标准。