Suppr超能文献

ST 段抬高与非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死经冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建后的结局。

Outcomes After ST-Segment Versus Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Revascularized by Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

机构信息

Heart Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Department of Neurology, North Karelia Central Hospital, Siun Sote, Joensuu, Finland; Department of Neurology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2020 Nov 15;135:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.08.042. Epub 2020 Aug 29.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the outcome differences between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients treated with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort follow-up study of consecutive patients with STEMI (surgery ≤48 hours of admission; n = 348) or NSTEMI (n = 1,160) revascularized with first-time isolated CABG in Finland using nationwide registries (median age 68 years, 24% women). The short- and long-term (10-year) outcomes were studied with inverse propensity probability weight adjustment for baseline features. The median follow-up was 5.2 years. In-hospital mortality (11.4% vs 5.3%; adj. odds ratio [OR] 2.27; confidence interval [CI] 1.41 to 3.66; p = 0.001) and re-sternotomy rates (6.9% vs 3.5%; adj. OR 2.07; CI 1.22 to 3.51; p = 0.007) were higher in STEMI patients. Long-term all-cause mortality did not differ between STEMI and NSTEMI patients among all operated patients (30.2% vs 28.3%; adj. HR 1.30; CI 0.97 to 1.75; p = 0.080) or hospital survivors (21.6 vs 24.3%; HR 0.93; CI 0.64 to 1.36; p = 0.713). Occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular event in hospital survivors within 10 years was 34.7% in STEMI versus 29.6% in NSTEMI (adj. HR 1.24; CI 0.88 to 1.76; p = 0.220). Occurrences of cardiovascular death (14.6% vs 14.4%; p = 0.773), myocardial infarction (MI; 15.2% vs 10.3%; p = 0.203), and stroke (10.8% vs 14.8%; p = 0.242) were also comparable. In conclusion, patients with STEMI have poorer short-term outcome compared to NSTEMI patients after revascularization by CABG, but the long-term outcomes are comparable regardless of MI type. Thus, both short- and long-term risks should be considered when evaluating patient´s for CABG eligibility by MI type.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨经冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的结局差异。我们使用芬兰全国登记系统,对连续接受首次孤立性 CABG 血运重建的 STEMI(入院后≤48 小时手术;n=348)或 NSTEMI(n=1160)患者进行了一项多中心回顾性队列随访研究(中位年龄 68 岁,24%为女性)。采用逆概率倾向评分调整基线特征进行短期和长期(10 年)结局研究。中位随访时间为 5.2 年。STEMI 患者院内死亡率(11.4%比 5.3%;校正比值比[OR] 2.27;95%置信区间[CI] 1.41 至 3.66;p=0.001)和再次开胸率(6.9%比 3.5%;校正 OR 2.07;95%CI 1.22 至 3.51;p=0.007)更高。在所有接受手术的患者中,STEMI 患者的长期全因死亡率与 NSTEMI 患者无差异(30.2%比 28.3%;校正 HR 1.30;95%CI 0.97 至 1.75;p=0.080)或医院幸存者(21.6%比 24.3%;HR 0.93;95%CI 0.64 至 1.36;p=0.713)。在 10 年内,院内幸存者发生主要不良心血管事件的发生率为 STEMI 患者 34.7%,NSTEMI 患者 29.6%(校正 HR 1.24;95%CI 0.88 至 1.76;p=0.220)。心血管死亡(14.6%比 14.4%;p=0.773)、心肌梗死(15.2%比 10.3%;p=0.203)和卒中(10.8%比 14.8%;p=0.242)的发生率也相似。总之,与 CABG 血运重建后的 NSTEMI 患者相比,STEMI 患者短期预后较差,但无论心肌梗死类型如何,长期结局相当。因此,在评估患者接受 CABG 的资格时,应考虑到 MI 类型的短期和长期风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验