Hitti Frederick L, Yang Andrew I, Cristancho Mario A, Baltuch Gordon H
Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 30;9(9):2796. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092796.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability and a significant cause of mortality worldwide. Approximately 30-40% of patients fail to achieve clinical remission with available pharmacological treatments, a clinical course termed treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Numerous studies have investigated deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a therapy for TRD. We performed a meta-analysis to determine efficacy and a meta-regression to compare stimulation targets. We identified and screened 1397 studies. We included 125 citations in the qualitative review and considered 26 for quantitative analysis. Only blinded studies that compared active DBS to sham stimulation (k = 12) were included in the meta-analysis. The random-effects model supported the efficacy of DBS for TRD (standardized mean difference = -0.75, <0 favors active stimulation; = 0.0001). The meta-regression did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between stimulation targets ( = 0.45). While enthusiasm for DBS treatment of TRD has been tempered by recent randomized trials, this meta-analysis reveals a significant effect of DBS for the treatment of TRD. Additionally, the majority of trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of DBS for this indication. Further trials are required to determine the optimal stimulation parameters and patient populations for which DBS would be effective. Particular attention to factors including electrode placement technique, patient selection, and long-term follow-up is essential for future trial design.
重度抑郁症(MDD)是全球致残的主要原因,也是导致死亡的重要因素。约30%-40%的患者采用现有的药物治疗无法实现临床缓解,这种临床病程被称为难治性抑郁症(TRD)。众多研究已将深部脑刺激(DBS)作为TRD的一种治疗方法进行了调查。我们进行了一项荟萃分析以确定疗效,并进行了一项荟萃回归以比较刺激靶点。我们识别并筛选了1397项研究。我们在定性综述中纳入了125篇文献,并考虑了26篇进行定量分析。荟萃分析仅纳入了将主动DBS与假刺激进行比较的盲法研究(k = 12)。随机效应模型支持DBS治疗TRD的疗效(标准化均值差=-0.75,<0支持主动刺激;=0.0001)。荟萃回归未显示刺激靶点之间存在统计学上的显著差异(=0.45)。虽然近期的随机试验降低了人们对DBS治疗TRD的热情,但这项荟萃分析揭示了DBS治疗TRD具有显著效果。此外,大多数试验已证明DBS用于该适应症的安全性和有效性。需要进一步的试验来确定DBS有效的最佳刺激参数和患者群体。对于未来的试验设计,特别关注包括电极放置技术、患者选择和长期随访等因素至关重要。