Suppr超能文献

探索临床结局在常规评估-厄瓜多尔结局测量中的心理测量特性。

Exploration of the psychometric properties of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure in Ecuador.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Universidad de Las Américas, Jose Queri y Av. De los Granados, EC170125, Quito, Ecuador.

Department of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Cathedral Court, 1 Vicar Lane, Sheffield, S1 2LT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2020 Sep 1;8(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00443-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a pan-theoretical and pan-diagnostic measure of mental health designed to cover issues that people wish to change in psychotherapy. The objective of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the Spanish translation of the CORE-OM, in a country, Ecuador for which there is not a single measure suitable for this purpose with empirically demonstrated local acceptability and psychometric properties.

METHODS

In total, 886 adults not currently receiving psychotherapy treatment or taking psychotropic medication were included in the analysis. The analyses broadly followed and compared with results from previous studies. These analyses consisted of assessment of acceptability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, influences of demographic variables, correlations between domain scores, and convergent validity with Spanish versions of the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 and Schwartz Outcome Scale-10.

RESULTS

The questionnaire showed good acceptability (overall omission rate of 0.56%), good reliability (α = .93 [.92, .94], test-retest correlations ranged from .59 to .85), and good convergent validity with the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (r = .84) and the Schwartz Outcome Scale-10 (r = -.73). Statistically significant gender differences were found in two domains: females scored higher on Well-being (M = 1.23) than males (M = 1.01), though effect size was small (g = 0.31); and males (M = 0.31) scored higher than females on Risk (M = 0.25), with even smaller effect size (g = 0.06). Age was negatively correlated with psychological distress in all domains and coefficients ranged from -.14 for Risk to -.29 for Functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the use of the CORE-OM as a valid and reliable instrument in a non-clinical Ecuadorean population. Exploration of the psychometric properties in a clinical population is recommended to assure its use in clinical settings.

摘要

背景

临床结果的常规评估-结果衡量(CORE-OM)是一种泛理论和泛诊断的心理健康衡量标准,旨在涵盖人们希望在心理治疗中改变的问题。本研究的目的是探索 CORE-OM 西班牙语翻译的心理测量特性,在厄瓜多尔这个国家,目前还没有一种单一的衡量标准具有经验证的当地可接受性和心理测量特性。

方法

共有 886 名未接受心理治疗或服用精神药物的成年人参与了分析。这些分析大致遵循并与之前的研究结果进行了比较。这些分析包括可接受性评估、内部一致性、测试-重测信度、人口统计学变量的影响、领域得分之间的相关性以及与西班牙语版本的结果问卷 45.2 和 Schwartz 结果量表-10 的收敛效度。

结果

问卷表现出良好的可接受性(总体遗漏率为 0.56%)、良好的可靠性(α=.93[.92,.94],测试-重测相关性范围为.59 至.85),以及与结果问卷 45.2(r=.84)和 Schwartz 结果量表-10(r=-.73)的良好收敛效度。在两个领域发现了统计学上显著的性别差异:女性在幸福感(M=1.23)上的得分高于男性(M=1.01),尽管效应量较小(g=0.31);男性在风险(M=0.31)上的得分高于女性,效应量更小(g=0.06)。年龄与所有领域的心理困扰呈负相关,系数范围从风险的-0.14 到功能的-0.29。

结论

结果支持在非临床厄瓜多尔人群中使用 CORE-OM 作为一种有效和可靠的工具。建议在临床人群中探索其心理测量特性,以确保在临床环境中使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/7465405/a7ce54483ee0/40359_2020_443_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验