• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放外侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的多中心回顾性队列研究。

Laparoscopic versus open lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: multicentre retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Colorectal Cancer Center, Seoul National University Cancer Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac068.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrac068
PMID:35694967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9189607/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) is an option in the treatment of rectal cancer and may reduce local recurrence/improve disease-free survival. Advancements in minimally invasive technology have improved the ability to identify anatomy and neurovascular structures that may help in LPLND. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and oncological safety of laparoscopic LPLND compared with the open LPLND.

METHOD

Between July 2010 and July 2019, patients from three tertiary referral hospitals who underwent LPLND with total mesorectal excision for primary rectal cancer were included. Baseline patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, pathologic results, recurrence, and survival were compared between the laparoscopic and open groups.

RESULTS

There were 126 and 70 patients in the laparoscopic and open groups respectively. The laparoscopic group had less estimated blood loss (100 ml versus 300 ml, P < 0.001) and lower transfusion rate (0.8 per cent versus 10.0 per cent; P = 0.003) but longer operating times (318 min versus 270 min, P = 0.004). The laparoscopic group had fewer wound infections (1.6 per cent versus 10.0 per cent, P = 0.011) and neuropathy (0 per cent versus 4.3 per cent, P = 0.044). Lateral pelvic recurrence rate was 7.6 per cent in the laparoscopic group and 19.6 per cent in the open group (P = 0.053). Recurrence-free survival (72.2 per cent versus 63.5 per cent; P = 0.190) and overall survival (93.3 per cent versus 85.0 per cent; P = 0.118) were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic LPLND was associated with improved perioperative outcomes and non-inferior oncological outcomes.

摘要

背景

侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPLND)是直肠癌治疗的一种选择,可降低局部复发率/改善无病生存率。微创技术的进步提高了识别解剖结构和神经血管结构的能力,这可能有助于 LPLND。本回顾性研究旨在评估腹腔镜 LPLND 与开放 LPLND 的技术可行性和肿瘤安全性。

方法

2010 年 7 月至 2019 年 7 月,纳入在三个三级转诊医院接受腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗原发性直肠癌的 LPLND 患者。比较腹腔镜组和开放组患者的基线特征、围手术期结果、病理结果、复发和生存情况。

结果

腹腔镜组和开放组分别有 126 例和 70 例患者。腹腔镜组的估计出血量较少(100ml 比 300ml,P<0.001),输血率较低(0.8%比 10.0%;P=0.003),但手术时间较长(318min 比 270min,P=0.004)。腹腔镜组的伤口感染率较低(1.6%比 10.0%,P=0.011),神经病变发生率较低(0%比 4.3%,P=0.044)。腹腔镜组的侧方盆腔复发率为 7.6%,开放组为 19.6%(P=0.053)。无复发生存率(72.2%比 63.5%;P=0.190)和总生存率(93.3%比 85.0%;P=0.118)无显著差异。

结论

腹腔镜 LPLND 具有改善的围手术期结果和非劣效的肿瘤学结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f866/9189607/a18c706cf2da/zrac068f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f866/9189607/38641d122a3e/zrac068f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f866/9189607/a18c706cf2da/zrac068f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f866/9189607/38641d122a3e/zrac068f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f866/9189607/a18c706cf2da/zrac068f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: multicentre retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜与开放外侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的多中心回顾性队列研究。
BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac068.
2
Feasibility of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision with Extended Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.术前放化疗后腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除联合扩大盆腔侧方淋巴结清扫治疗晚期低位直肠癌的可行性
World J Surg. 2017 Mar;41(3):868-875. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3762-0.
3
Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.腹腔镜与开放手术行局部进展期低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术:日本一项大型多中心队列研究的亚组分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):954-964. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000843.
4
Long-term outcomes of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for clinical stage II/III middle-lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.吲哚菁绿荧光成像引导腹腔镜侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗Ⅱ/Ⅲ期中低位直肠癌的长期疗效:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Sep;27(9):759-767. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02761-x. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
5
Laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: are they obsolete?腹腔镜直肠癌治疗与侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术:它们过时了吗?
Minerva Chir. 2018 Dec;73(6):558-573. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07704-0. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for locally advanced middle-low rectal cancer: Results of a multicentre lateral node study in China.腹腔镜与开腹选择性侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期中低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效:中国多中心侧方淋巴结研究结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Nov;24(11):1325-1334. doi: 10.1111/codi.16223. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
7
Long-term effects of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on urinary retention in rectal cancer.腹腔镜盆腔侧方淋巴结清扫术对直肠癌患者尿潴留的长期影响
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):999-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08364-7. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is achievable and offers advantages as a minimally invasive surgery over the open approach.腹腔镜盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫术是可行的,作为一种微创手术,它比开放手术具有优势。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1938-47. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4418-0. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
9
Laparoscopic and robotic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.腹腔镜和机器人辅助直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术。
Surg Today. 2020 Mar;50(3):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-01958-z. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
10
Laparoscopic versus open selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection following total mesorectal excision for locally advanced low rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹选择性侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术在局部进展期低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术后的应用对比。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;35(7):1301-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03609-8. Epub 2020 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Locally-Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study Comparing Perioperative Morbidity and Short-Term Oncological Outcomes.腹腔镜与机器人辅助下局部进展期直肠癌侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术:一项比较围手术期发病率和短期肿瘤学结局的队列研究
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Mar;8(3):e70174. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70174.
2
Initial experience and results of robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer-a single center experience of 17 consecutive procedures.局部进展期直肠癌机器人辅助侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术的初步经验与结果——连续17例手术的单中心经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Dec 17;39(1):204. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04782-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Local recurrences in western low rectal cancer patients treated with or without lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy: An international multi-centre comparative study.局部复发在接受新辅助(放化疗)治疗后的低位直肠癌患者中:国际多中心比较研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;47(9):2441-2449. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
2
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced middle/lower rectal cancer using a propensity score-matched analysis.采用倾向评分匹配分析比较腹腔镜与开腹侧方淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期中/低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4427-4435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07943-4. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
3
The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes.
侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术在晚期直肠癌中的作用:当前证据与结果综述
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Aug;40(4):363-374. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
4
Urinary and sexual function after robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人和腹腔镜直肠癌手术后的泌尿和性功能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 22;18(1):262. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02019-0.
5
Comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, and open surgery for lateral lymph-node dissection for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术、机器人辅助腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的短期结局比较:网状 Meta 分析。
Updates Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):1151-1160. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01871-x. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection.推进中直肠肿瘤外科手术:与传统腹腔镜辅助切除相比,揭示自然腔道标本提取手术的潜力。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 May;7(5):e2003. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2003.
Oncological Impact of Lateral Lymph Node Dissection After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer.术前放化疗后直肠癌患者侧方淋巴结清扫的肿瘤学影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;27(9):3525-3533. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08481-y. Epub 2020 May 8.
4
Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.术前放化疗治疗低位直肠癌的腹腔镜侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1425-1431. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07224-9. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
5
Neoadjuvant (Chemo)radiotherapy With Total Mesorectal Excision Only Is Not Sufficient to Prevent Lateral Local Recurrence in Enlarged Nodes: Results of the Multicenter Lateral Node Study of Patients With Low cT3/4 Rectal Cancer.仅新辅助(化疗)放疗联合全直肠系膜切除术不足以预防扩大淋巴结中的侧方局部复发:低位 cT3/4 直肠癌患者多中心侧方淋巴结研究的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;37(1):33-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00032. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
6
Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: View from the West.新辅助放化疗后机器人辅助侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术:西方视角
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Sep;61(9):1119-1120. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001170.
7
Outcomes and prognostic factors of selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection with preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.术前放化疗后选择性侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的疗效和预后因素。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):367-374. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2974-1. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.腹腔镜与开放手术行局部进展期低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术:日本一项大型多中心队列研究的亚组分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):954-964. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000843.
9
What To Do With Lateral Nodal Disease in Low Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? A Call for Further Reflection and Research.局部晚期低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移该如何处理?呼吁进一步思考与研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jun;60(6):577-585. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000834.
10
Association between pathologic features of peripheral nerves and postoperative anal function after neoadjuvant therapy for low rectal cancer.低位直肠癌新辅助治疗后周围神经病理特征与术后肛门功能的相关性
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Dec;31(12):1845-1852. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2640-4. Epub 2016 Sep 21.