Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Exp Mol Med. 2020 Sep;52(9):1550-1563. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-00493-8. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
Although approved programmed cell death protein (PD)-1 inhibitors show durable responses, clinical benefits to these agents are only seen in one-third of patients in most cancer types. Therefore, strategies for improving the response to PD-1 inhibitor for treating various cancers including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are urgently needed. Compared with genome and transcriptome, tumor DNA methylome in anti-PD-1 response was relatively unexplored. We compared the pre-treatment methylation status of cis-regulatory elements between responders and non-responders to treatment with nivolumab or pembrolizumab using the Infinium Methylation EPIC Array, which can profile ~850,000 CpG sites, including ~350,000 CpG sites located in enhancer regions. Then, we analyzed differentially methylated regions overlapping promoters (pDMRs) or enhancers (eDMRs) between responders and non-responders to PD-1 inhibitors. We identified 1007 pDMRs and 607 eDMRs associated with the anti-PD-1 response. We also identified 1109 and 1173 target genes putatively regulated by these pDMRs and eDMRs, respectively. We found that eDMRs contribute to the epigenetic regulation of the anti-PD-1 response more than pDMRs. Hypomethylated pDMRs of Cytohesin 1 Interacting Protein (CYTIP) and TNF superfamily member 8 (TNFSF8) were more predictive than programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression for anti-PD-1 response and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a validation cohort, suggesting their potential as predictive biomarkers for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. The catalog of promoters and enhancers differentially methylated between responders and non-responders to PD-1 inhibitors presented herein will guide the development of biomarkers and therapeutic strategies for improving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in NSCLC.
尽管已批准的程序性死亡蛋白(PD)-1 抑制剂显示出持久的应答,但在大多数癌症类型中,这些药物仅能使三分之一的患者受益。因此,迫切需要寻找提高 PD-1 抑制剂治疗各种癌症(包括非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC))应答的策略。与基因组和转录组相比,PD-1 应答中的肿瘤 DNA 甲基组相对而言尚未得到探索。我们使用 Infinium Methylation EPIC 阵列比较了应答者和无应答者在接受 nivolumab 或 pembrolizumab 治疗前后顺式调控元件的预治疗甲基化状态,该阵列可对约 850,000 个 CpG 位点进行分析,包括约 350,000 个位于增强子区域的 CpG 位点。然后,我们分析了 PD-1 抑制剂应答者和无应答者之间重叠启动子(pDMRs)或增强子(eDMRs)的差异甲基化区域。我们鉴定出 1007 个与抗 PD-1 应答相关的 pDMRs 和 607 个 eDMRs。我们还分别鉴定出这些 pDMRs 和 eDMRs 潜在调控的 1109 个和 1173 个靶基因。我们发现 eDMRs 比 pDMRs 更有助于 PD-1 应答的表观遗传调控。在验证队列中,与 PD-L1 表达相比,细胞附着蛋白 1 相互作用蛋白(CYTIP)和 TNF 超家族成员 8(TNFSF8)的低甲基化 pDMRs 对抗 PD-1 应答和无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)更具预测性,表明它们有可能成为抗 PD-1 免疫治疗的预测生物标志物。本文介绍的 PD-1 抑制剂应答者和无应答者之间差异甲基化的启动子和增强子目录将为改善 NSCLC 中抗 PD-1 免疫治疗的生物标志物和治疗策略的开发提供指导。