Suppr超能文献

通过对两种血培养系统(隔离器系统和12管系统)在培养不同时间段的检测能力累积差异进行比较分析。

Comparative analysis of two blood culture systems (Isolator and a 12-tube system) by cumulative differences in detection power at different times during incubation.

作者信息

Arpi M, Prag J, Schrøder S S, Bentzon M W, Frederiksen W

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Bacteriology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

APMIS. 1988 May;96(5):455-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1988.tb05329.x.

Abstract

A lysis-centrifugation blood culture system (Isolator) and a conventional system (4 tubes of nutrient broth, 4 tubes of semisolid agar, and 4 tubes of thioglycollate agar) were compared after different lengths of incubation by cumulative scoring of differences in detection power. After the first half day of incubation, the Isolator system was already significantly faster in detecting isolates of clinical significance (15 vs. 4, P = 0.02). Maximum difference in first or only detection system was seen after two days of incubation and was based on an overall superior detection of Staphylococcus aureus (11 vs. 0, P = 0.001), and an earlier detection of Enterobacteriaceae (30 vs. 13, P = 0.01) in the Isolator system. On the contrary, the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae was significantly inferior in the Isolator system (0 vs. 10, P = 0.002). The earlier finding of clinically significant microorganisms in the Isolator system certainly contributes to good patient-care. A drawback of the Isolator system was the finding of clinically insignificant coagulase-negative staphylococci in 11%, compared with 1% in the conventional system. This led to a considerable waste of time and materials in the laboratory. The comparison of the two blood culture systems, based on statistical analysis of cumulative differences in detection power, expressed as the earliest or only findings, gives the optimal information, and is in our opinion the clinically most relevant comparison.

摘要

通过对检测能力差异进行累积评分,比较了裂解离心血液培养系统(隔离器)和传统系统(4管营养肉汤、4管半固体琼脂和4管硫乙醇酸盐琼脂)在不同孵育时间后的情况。孵育半天后,隔离器系统在检测具有临床意义的分离株方面已经明显更快(15例对4例,P = 0.02)。在孵育两天后,观察到第一个或唯一检测系统的最大差异,这基于隔离器系统对金黄色葡萄球菌的总体检测更优(11例对0例,P = 0.001),以及对肠杆菌科细菌的更早检测(30例对13例,P = 0.01)。相反,隔离器系统中肺炎链球菌的检测明显较差(0例对10例,P = 0.002)。在隔离器系统中更早发现具有临床意义的微生物肯定有助于良好的患者护理。隔离器系统的一个缺点是发现11%的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌无临床意义,而传统系统中这一比例为1%。这导致实验室在时间和材料上的大量浪费。基于对检测能力累积差异的统计分析(表示为最早或唯一发现)对两种血液培养系统进行比较,可提供最佳信息,并且在我们看来是临床上最相关的比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验