Khan Ahsen, Sharma Dileep
College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, 14-88 McGregor Road, Smithfield 4878, QLD, Australia.
Department of Periodontics, James Cook University, 14-88 McGregor Road, Smithfield 4878, QLD, Australia.
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Sep 1;8(3):100. doi: 10.3390/dj8030100.
BACKGROUND/AIM: This survey-based study aims to explore the clinical management protocols of followed by Australian periodontists in relation to peri-implant diseases.
A five-part online questionnaire was developed and administered through email. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis, with the univariate associations between a categorical outcome and the variables evaluated using Pearson's Chi-squared test.
The survey yielded 99 responses, resulting in a response rate of 41.8%. Most participants were male and aged 35-44 years. More than a quarter of practitioners had been placing implants for 6-10 years and almost two-fifths of practitioners placed 1-10 implants per month. The estimated prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis in the general Australian population was 47% and 21%, respectively. Practitioners reported using systemic antibiotics to manage peri-implant mucositis (7%) and (72%) peri-implantitis lesions, with a combination of amoxicillin and metronidazole. Most common treatment modalities were oral hygiene instructions, nonsurgical debridement and antimicrobial gel/rinse. Surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics were also often used for peri-implantitis treatment. Practitioners preferred a 3-month clinical follow-up and 6-month radiographic evaluation. Furthermore, three-quarters of practitioners rated their management as moderately effective, although upwards of nine-tenths expressed the need for further training and awareness.
This study confirms a significant use of empirical treatment modalities due to lack of standard therapeutic protocol. However, some approaches followed by the specialists may provide a basis to formulate a therapeutic protocol for peri-implant disease management.
背景/目的:这项基于调查的研究旨在探讨澳大利亚牙周病医生针对种植体周围疾病的临床管理方案。
设计了一份包含五个部分的在线问卷,并通过电子邮件进行发放。采用描述性统计进行分析,使用Pearson卡方检验评估分类结果与变量之间的单变量关联。
该调查共收到99份回复,回复率为41.8%。大多数参与者为男性,年龄在35 - 44岁之间。超过四分之一的从业者从事种植工作6 - 10年,近五分之二的从业者每月植入1 - 10颗种植体。据估计,澳大利亚普通人群中种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎的患病率分别为47%和21%。从业者报告称,他们使用全身用抗生素来治疗种植体周围黏膜炎(7%)和种植体周围炎(72%),使用的是阿莫西林和甲硝唑的联合用药。最常见的治疗方式是口腔卫生指导、非手术清创以及抗菌凝胶/漱口水。手术清创和全身用抗生素也常用于种植体周围炎的治疗。从业者倾向于3个月的临床随访和6个月的影像学评估。此外,四分之三的从业者认为他们的管理效果中等,尽管超过十分之九的人表示需要进一步培训并提高认识。
本研究证实,由于缺乏标准治疗方案,经验性治疗方式被大量使用。然而,专家们采用的一些方法可能为制定种植体周围疾病管理的治疗方案提供基础。