• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《建筑工程职业风险评估方法协议的制定:预防措施水平》。

Development of the Protocol of the Occupational Risk Assessment Method for Construction Works: Level of Preventive Action.

机构信息

Department of Applied Mechanics and Project Engineering, School of Aerospace and Industrial Engineering of Toledo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.

Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas y su Control, Escuela Técnica Superior de Edificación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;17(17):6369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176369.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17176369
PMID:32883009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7504382/
Abstract

Risk assessment on a construction site is based on the probability and consequences of the accident. But due to the complexity of the construction processes, this new methodology for the evaluation of occupational risks, called Level of Preventive Action, develops a new parameter for evaluating preventive action based on documentary environment that reflects the complexity of the work units, location and interdependence, construction environment referred to construction and protection systems, and social environment relative to the perception of the environment and the workers' emotional states. The evaluation criteria of the new method are established by developing the William T. Fine methodology and incorporating concepts such as risk tolerance, the importance of work and personal satisfaction, which justify the degree of correction of preventive actions. This methodology determines the amount of preventive action control that is required during the construction process. This research proposes a risk assessment protocol adapted to construction sites based on specialized technical observation with a psychosocial survey on site. Some results of the implementation of the method in real work are shown. In conclusion, the determining parameter towards optimal control of preventive action is the direct and active participation of workers in safety matters.

摘要

施工现场的风险评估基于事故发生的概率和后果。但是,由于施工过程的复杂性,这种新的职业风险评估方法,称为“预防行动级别”,基于反映工作单位复杂性的文件环境开发了一个新的预防行动评估参数,包括位置和相互依存关系、施工环境涉及施工和保护系统,以及与环境感知和工人情绪状态有关的社会环境。新方法的评估标准是通过开发威廉·T·法因方法并纳入风险容忍度、工作重要性和个人满意度等概念来建立的,这些概念证明了预防措施纠正程度的合理性。该方法确定了施工过程中所需的预防行动控制量。本研究提出了一种基于现场专门技术观察和现场社会心理调查的适应施工现场的风险评估方案。展示了该方法在实际工作中的一些实施结果。结论是,确定预防行动最佳控制的决定因素是工人直接积极参与安全事务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/dc0c7cd79651/ijerph-17-06369-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/2b20738add4e/ijerph-17-06369-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/c2befe97f08b/ijerph-17-06369-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/8133d385e681/ijerph-17-06369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/b6387924b6f2/ijerph-17-06369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/3e1135a43d10/ijerph-17-06369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/c6ca84ca6a3a/ijerph-17-06369-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/5b3d4ba00dae/ijerph-17-06369-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/eda49d6f0fe0/ijerph-17-06369-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/ca1243cdfae1/ijerph-17-06369-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/60347870a0f3/ijerph-17-06369-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/6c3340535d20/ijerph-17-06369-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/48a8f2be37ed/ijerph-17-06369-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/25a19fb69cb5/ijerph-17-06369-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/d1eb596f986f/ijerph-17-06369-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/2e7b539171d7/ijerph-17-06369-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/a2a1145784a2/ijerph-17-06369-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/32cd3d307eee/ijerph-17-06369-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/dc0c7cd79651/ijerph-17-06369-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/2b20738add4e/ijerph-17-06369-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/c2befe97f08b/ijerph-17-06369-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/8133d385e681/ijerph-17-06369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/b6387924b6f2/ijerph-17-06369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/3e1135a43d10/ijerph-17-06369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/c6ca84ca6a3a/ijerph-17-06369-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/5b3d4ba00dae/ijerph-17-06369-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/eda49d6f0fe0/ijerph-17-06369-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/ca1243cdfae1/ijerph-17-06369-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/60347870a0f3/ijerph-17-06369-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/6c3340535d20/ijerph-17-06369-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/48a8f2be37ed/ijerph-17-06369-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/25a19fb69cb5/ijerph-17-06369-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/d1eb596f986f/ijerph-17-06369-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/2e7b539171d7/ijerph-17-06369-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/a2a1145784a2/ijerph-17-06369-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/32cd3d307eee/ijerph-17-06369-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b5/7504382/dc0c7cd79651/ijerph-17-06369-g016.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the Protocol of the Occupational Risk Assessment Method for Construction Works: Level of Preventive Action.《建筑工程职业风险评估方法协议的制定:预防措施水平》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;17(17):6369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176369.
2
Development of the Level of Preventive Action Method by Observation of the Characteristic Value for the Assessment of Occupational Risks on Construction Sites.通过观察施工现场职业风险评估的特征值来制定预防行动方法的水平。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 8;18(16):8387. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168387.
3
Zero-Risk Interpretation in the Level of Preventive Action Method Implementation for Health and Safety in Construction Sites.施工现场健康与安全的预防行动方法实施中的零风险解释。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 29;18(7):3534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073534.
4
Health Behaviours in Scaffold Use Risk Assessment Model - SURAM.脚手架使用风险评估模型 - SURAM 中的健康行为
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019 Mar 22;26(1):138-142. doi: 10.26444/aaem/100534. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
An application of the Pareto method in surveys to diagnose managers' and workers' perception of occupational safety and health on selected Polish construction sites.帕累托方法在调查中的应用,以诊断波兰部分建筑工地管理人员和工人对职业安全与健康的认知。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018 Sep;24(3):406-421. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1375781. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
6
Towards a better reliability of risk assessment: development of a qualitative & quantitative risk evaluation model (Q2REM) for different trades of construction works in Hong Kong.迈向更可靠的风险评估:为香港不同建筑工种开发定性和定量风险评估模型(Q2REM)。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Sep;48:167-84. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 28.
7
Critical factors and paths influencing construction workers' safety risk tolerances.影响建筑工人安全风险容忍度的关键因素和路径。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:267-279. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.027. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
8
Ethnic background and risk perception in construction workers: development and validation of an exploratory tool.建筑工人的种族背景与风险认知:一种探索性工具的开发与验证
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Mar 13;33(2):163-172. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01478. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
9
Safety leadership at construction sites: the importance of rule-oriented and participative leadership.建筑施工现场的安全领导力:规则导向型领导和参与式领导的重要性。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Jul 1;43(4):375-384. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3650. Epub 2017 May 30.
10
An investigation and analysis of safety issues in Polish small construction plants.波兰小型建筑工厂安全问题的调查与分析
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(4):498-511. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1085206.

引用本文的文献

1
Data-Driven Construction Safety Information Sharing System Based on Linked Data, Ontologies, and Knowledge Graph Technologies.基于关联数据、本体和知识图技术的数据驱动型施工安全信息共享系统。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):794. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020794.
2
Development of the Level of Preventive Action Method by Observation of the Characteristic Value for the Assessment of Occupational Risks on Construction Sites.通过观察施工现场职业风险评估的特征值来制定预防行动方法的水平。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 8;18(16):8387. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168387.
3
Zero-Risk Interpretation in the Level of Preventive Action Method Implementation for Health and Safety in Construction Sites.

本文引用的文献

1
Causes of construction injuries: a review.建筑施工伤害的原因:综述
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Mar;28(1):343-353. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1761678. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Exploring patterns of multiple climates and their effects on safety performance at the department level.探索多种气候模式及其对部门安全绩效的影响。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.009. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
3
Factors affecting unsafe behavior in construction projects: development and validation of a new questionnaire.影响建筑项目不安全行为的因素:新问卷的开发和验证。
施工现场健康与安全的预防行动方法实施中的零风险解释。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 29;18(7):3534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073534.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Jun;26(2):219-226. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1408243. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
4
Global occupational health: current challenges and the need for urgent action.全球职业卫生:当前的挑战和紧迫行动的需要。
Ann Glob Health. 2014 Jul-Aug;80(4):251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
5
Contributing factors in construction accidents.建筑事故中的促成因素。
Appl Ergon. 2005 Jul;36(4):401-15. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.12.002. Epub 2005 Mar 27.