Suppr超能文献

190247 例实体瘤中细胞周期通路基因组改变:利用大规模数据为治疗方向提供信息。

Cyclin Pathway Genomic Alterations Across 190,247 Solid Tumors: Leveraging Large-Scale Data to Inform Therapeutic Directions.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Oncology, Hospital Sirio Libanes, São Paulo, Brazil.

Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2021 Jan;26(1):e78-e89. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0509. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We describe the landscape of cyclin and interactive gene pathway alterations in 190,247 solid tumors.

METHODS

Using comprehensive genomic profiling (315 genes, >500× coverage), samples were analyzed for alterations in activating/sensitizing cyclin genes (CDK4 amplification, CDK6 amplification, CCND1, CCND2, CCND3, CDKN2B [loss], CDKN2A [loss], SMARCB1), hormone genes (estrogen receptor 1 [ESR1], androgen receptor [AR]), and co-alterations in genes leading to cyclin inhibitor therapeutic resistance (RB1 and CCNE1).

RESULTS

Alterations in at least one cyclin activating/sensitizing gene occurred in 24% of malignancies. Tumors that frequently harbored at least one cyclin alteration were brain gliomas (47.1%), esophageal (40.3%) and bladder cancer (37.9%), and mesotheliomas (37.9%). The most frequent alterations included CDKN2A (13.9%) and CDKN2B loss (12.5%). Examples of unique patterns of alterations included CCND1 amplification in breast cancer (17.3%); CDK4 alterations in sarcomas (12%); CCND2 in testicular cancer (23.4%), and SMARCB1 mutations in kidney cancer (3% overall, 90% in malignant rhabdoid tumors). Alterations in resistance genes RB1 and CCNE1 affected 7.2% and 3.6% of samples. Co-occurrence analysis demonstrated a lower likelihood of concomitant versus isolated alterations in cyclin activating/sensitizing and resistance genes (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; p < .001), except in colorectal, cervical, and small intestine cancers. AR and cyclin activating/sensitizing alterations in prostate cancer co-occurred more frequently (vs. AR alterations and wild-type cyclin activating/sensitizing alterations) (OR, 1.79; p < .001) as did ESR1 and cyclin activating/sensitizing alterations in breast (OR, 1.62; p < .001) and cervical cancer (OR, 4.08; p = .04) (vs. ESR1 and cyclin wild-type activating/sensitizing alterations).

CONCLUSION

Cyclin pathway alterations vary according to tumor type/histology, informing opportunities for targeted therapy, including for rare cancers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Cyclin pathway genomic abnormalities are frequent in human solid tumors, with substantial variation according to tumor site and histology. Opportunities for targeted therapy emerge with comprehensive profiling of this pathway.

摘要

背景

我们描述了 190247 个实体瘤中细胞周期和交互基因途径改变的情况。

方法

使用综合基因组分析(315 个基因,> 500 倍覆盖),对激活/敏化细胞周期基因(CDK4 扩增、CDK6 扩增、CCND1、CCND2、CCND3、CDKN2B[缺失]、CDKN2A[缺失]、SMARCB1)、激素基因(雌激素受体 1[ESR1]、雄激素受体[AR])和导致细胞周期抑制剂治疗耐药的基因共改变(RB1 和 CCNE1)的改变进行分析。

结果

至少有一个细胞周期激活/敏化基因改变的恶性肿瘤发生率为 24%。经常发生至少一种细胞周期改变的肿瘤是脑胶质瘤(47.1%)、食管(40.3%)和膀胱癌(37.9%)和间皮瘤(37.9%)。最常见的改变包括 CDKN2A(13.9%)和 CDKN2B 缺失(12.5%)。独特的改变模式包括乳腺癌中 CCND1 扩增(17.3%);肉瘤中 CDK4 改变(12%);睾丸癌中 CCND2 改变(23.4%)和肾癌中 SMARCB1 突变(总体 3%,恶性横纹肌样肿瘤 90%)。耐药基因 RB1 和 CCNE1 的改变影响了 7.2%和 3.6%的样本。共发生分析表明,细胞周期激活/敏化和耐药基因的同时改变比单独改变的可能性更低(比值比[OR],0.35;p <.001),除了结直肠癌、宫颈癌和小肠癌外。前列腺癌中 AR 和细胞周期激活/敏化改变比 AR 改变和野生型细胞周期激活/敏化改变更常共发生(OR,1.79;p <.001),而乳腺癌(OR,1.62;p <.001)和宫颈癌(OR,4.08;p =.04)中 ESR1 和细胞周期激活/敏化改变比 ESR1 和野生型细胞周期激活/敏化改变更常共发生。

结论

细胞周期途径的改变因肿瘤类型/组织学而异,为靶向治疗提供了机会,包括罕见癌症。

意义

细胞周期途径的基因组异常在人类实体瘤中很常见,根据肿瘤部位和组织学有很大差异。通过对该途径进行全面分析,为靶向治疗提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebb7/7794175/4a51b04f56b2/ONCO-26-e78-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验