Schiro Jessica, Pelayo Sylvia, Martinot Alain, Dubos François, Beuscart-Zéphir Marie-Catherine, Marcilly Romaric
Inserm, CIC-IT 1403/Evalab, F-59000, Lille, France.
Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000, Lille, France.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Sep 4;7(3):e18427. doi: 10.2196/18427.
Overcrowding in the emergency departments has become an increasingly significant problem. Patient triage strategies are acknowledged to help clinicians manage patient flow and reduce patients' waiting time. However, electronic patient triage systems are not developed so that they comply with clinicians' workflow.
This case study presents the development of a patient prioritization tool (PPT) and of the related patient prioritization algorithm (PPA) for a pediatric emergency department (PED), relying on a human-centered design process.
We followed a human-centered design process, wherein we (1) performed a work system analysis through observations and interviews in an academic hospital's PED; (2) deduced design specifications; (3) designed a mock PPT and the related PPA; and (4) performed user testing to assess the intuitiveness of the icons, the effectiveness in communicating patient priority, the fit between the prioritization model implemented and the participants' prioritization rules, and the participants' satisfaction.
The workflow analysis identified that the PPT interface should meet the needs of physicians and nurses, represent the stages of patient care, and contain patient information such as waiting time, test status (eg, prescribed, in progress), age, and a suggestion for prioritization. The mock-up developed gives the status of patients progressing through the PED; a strip represents the patient and the patient's characteristics, including a delay indicator that compares the patient's waiting time to the average waiting time of patients with a comparable reason for emergency. User tests revealed issues with icon intuitiveness, information gaps, and possible refinements in the prioritization algorithm.
The results of the user tests have led to modifications to improve the usability and usefulness of the PPT and its PPA. We discuss the value of integrating human factors into the design process for a PPT for PED. The PPT/PPA has been developed and installed in Lille University Hospital's PED. Studies are carried out to evaluate the use and impact of this tool on clinicians' situation awareness and prioritization-related cognitive load, prioritization of patients, waiting time, and patients' experience.
急诊科人满为患已成为一个日益严重的问题。患者分诊策略被认为有助于临床医生管理患者流量并减少患者等待时间。然而,电子患者分诊系统的开发并未使其符合临床医生的工作流程。
本案例研究介绍了一种用于儿科急诊科(PED)的患者优先级工具(PPT)及相关患者优先级算法(PPA)的开发,该开发依赖于以人为本的设计过程。
我们遵循了以人为本的设计过程,其中我们(1)通过在一家学术医院的儿科急诊科进行观察和访谈来进行工作系统分析;(2)推导设计规范;(3)设计一个模拟PPT及相关PPA;(4)进行用户测试,以评估图标的直观性、传达患者优先级的有效性、所实施的优先级模型与参与者的优先级规则之间的契合度以及参与者的满意度。
工作流程分析确定,PPT界面应满足医生和护士的需求,体现患者护理阶段,并包含患者信息,如等待时间、检查状态(如已开单、进行中)、年龄以及优先级建议。所开发的模型展示了患者在儿科急诊科的进展情况;一条带代表患者及其特征,包括一个延迟指标,该指标将患者的等待时间与因类似急诊原因就诊的患者的平均等待时间进行比较。用户测试揭示了图标直观性、信息缺口以及优先级算法可能需要改进的问题。
用户测试结果促使我们进行修改,以提高PPT及其PPA的可用性和实用性。我们讨论了将人为因素纳入儿科急诊科PPT设计过程的价值。PPT/PPA已在里尔大学医院的儿科急诊科开发并安装。正在开展研究以评估该工具对临床医生态势感知和与优先级相关的认知负荷、患者优先级排序、等待时间以及患者体验的使用情况和影响。