Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, St Catherine University, 2004 Randolph Ave, St Paul, MN 55105 (USA). Dr Biggs is a certified wound specialist.
Phys Ther. 2020 Dec 7;100(12):2165-2173. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa158.
This study investigates if higher utilization of physical therapist assistants adversely affects patient outcomes in the acute rehabilitation setting for patients following a cerebrovascular accident (CVA).
Participants were admitted to 1 of 5 inpatient rehabilitation facilities following a CVA from 2008 to 2010. High physical therapist assistant use was defined as ≥20% of the physical therapist visits being provided by the physical therapist assistant for an episode of care. Multivariable regression techniques examined differences in functional outcome, discharge location, and length of stay between high and low physical therapist assistant use groups. Propensity scoring methods supplemented findings of the regression analyses.
Of the 1561 participants, 496 (32%) had high physical therapist assistant involvement. Baseline participant characteristics such as age, sex, baseline motor function, and comorbidities did not differ between high and low physical therapist assistant use groups. After adjusting for patient characteristics, rehabilitation facility, and year, higher physical therapist assistant use did not adversely affect functional outcome or length of stay. Fewer conclusions can be drawn regarding discharge location, although there was no significant difference in discharge location between groups with high and low physical therapist assistant utilization. Propensity scoring methods supported the findings of the regression analyses.
Higher physical therapist assistant involvement in the rehabilitation of patients following CVA did not adversely affect functional outcome, increase length of stay, or reduce the likelihood of discharge to home from an inpatient rehabilitation facility.
The results demonstrate the value of the physical therapist assistant in the provision of physical therapy for patients with stroke in the inpatient rehabilitation setting. Higher involvement of the physical therapist assistant may provide cost savings while maintaining patient outcomes for this setting and population.
本研究旨在探讨在急性康复环境中,对于脑卒中后患者,物理治疗师助理的高利用率是否会对患者的结局产生不利影响。
参与者在 2008 年至 2010 年间因脑卒中被收治至 5 家住院康复机构之一。高物理治疗师助理使用率的定义为:在一个疗程中,物理治疗师助理提供的物理治疗师访问次数占比≥20%。多变量回归技术用于检查高、低物理治疗师助理使用率组之间在功能结局、出院地点和住院时间方面的差异。倾向评分法补充了回归分析的结果。
在 1561 名参与者中,有 496 名(32%)存在高物理治疗师助理参与。高、低物理治疗师助理使用率组之间的基线参与者特征(如年龄、性别、基线运动功能和合并症)无差异。在调整患者特征、康复机构和年份后,高物理治疗师助理使用率并未对功能结局或住院时间产生不利影响。关于出院地点,可得出的结论较少,尽管高、低物理治疗师助理使用率组之间的出院地点无显著差异。倾向评分法支持回归分析的结果。
在脑卒中后患者的康复过程中,增加物理治疗师助理的参与并未对功能结局产生不利影响,也不会延长住院时间或降低从住院康复机构出院回家的可能性。
结果表明了物理治疗师助理在住院康复环境中为脑卒中患者提供物理治疗的价值。在该环境和人群中,更高的物理治疗师助理参与度可能会带来成本节约,同时维持患者的结局。