• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中低收入国家剖宫产术合理使用的非临床干预措施的实施和评估:一项多地点混合有效性实施 III 期试验方案。

Implementation and evaluation of nonclinical interventions for appropriate use of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a multisite hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III trial.

机构信息

CEPED, Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, IRD-Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France.

UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 4;15(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01029-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-020-01029-4
PMID:32887669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7650262/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While cesarean sections (CSs) are a life-saving intervention, an increasing number are performed without medical reasons in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Unnecessary CS diverts scarce resources and thereby reduces access to healthcare for women in need. Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand, and Vietnam are committed to reducing unnecessary CS, but many individual and organizational factors in healthcare facilities obstruct this aim. Nonclinical interventions can overcome these barriers by helping providers improve their practices and supporting women's decision-making regarding childbirth. Existing evidence has shown only a modest effect of single interventions on reducing CS rates, arguably because of the failure to design multifaceted interventions effectively tailored to the context. The aim of this study is to design, adapt, and test a multifaceted intervention for the appropriate use of CS in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand, and Vietnam.

METHODS

We designed an intervention (QUALIty DECision-making-QUALI-DEC) with four components: (1) opinion leaders at heathcare facilities to improve adherence to best practices among clinicians, (2) CS audits and feedback to help providers identify potentially avoidable CS, (3) a decision analysis tool to help women make an informed decision on the mode of birth, and (4) companionship to support women during labor. QUALI-DEC will be implemented and evaluated in 32 hospitals (8 sites per country) using a pragmatic hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to test our implementation strategy, and information regarding its impact on relevant maternal and perinatal outcomes will be gathered. The implementation strategy will involve the participation of women, healthcare professionals, and organizations and account for the local environment, needs, resources, and social factors in each country.

DISCUSSION

There is urgent need for interventions and implementation strategies to optimize the use of CS while improving health outcomes and satisfaction in LMICs. This can only be achieved by engaging all stakeholders involved in the decision-making process surrounding birth and addressing their needs and concerns. The study will generate robust evidence about the effectiveness and the impact of this multifaceted intervention. It will also assess the acceptability and scalability of the intervention and the capacity for empowerment among women and providers alike.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN67214403.

摘要

背景

剖宫产(CS)是一种救生干预措施,但在中低收入国家(LMIC),越来越多的 CS 是在没有医学原因的情况下进行的。不必要的 CS 会转移稀缺资源,从而减少有需要的妇女获得医疗保健的机会。阿根廷、布基纳法索、泰国和越南都致力于减少不必要的 CS,但医疗机构中的许多个人和组织因素阻碍了这一目标的实现。非临床干预可以通过帮助提供者改善实践并支持妇女在分娩方面做出决策来克服这些障碍。现有证据表明,单一干预措施对降低 CS 率的影响仅适度,这可能是因为未能有效地设计针对具体情况的多方面干预措施。本研究旨在为阿根廷、布基纳法索、泰国和越南设计、改编和测试一种多方面的干预措施,以合理使用 CS。

方法

我们设计了一个干预措施(QUALIty DECision-making-QUALI-DEC),包括四个组成部分:(1)医疗机构的意见领袖,以提高临床医生遵守最佳实践的能力,(2)CS 审核和反馈,以帮助提供者识别潜在可避免的 CS,(3)决策分析工具,以帮助妇女就分娩方式做出明智的决定,(4)陪伴,以支持妇女分娩。QUALI-DEC 将在 32 家医院(每个国家 8 个地点)中实施和评估,采用实用混合有效性实施设计来测试我们的实施策略,并收集有关其对相关产妇和围产期结局的影响的信息。实施策略将涉及妇女、医疗保健专业人员和组织的参与,并考虑到每个国家的当地环境、需求、资源和社会因素。

讨论

迫切需要干预措施和实施策略来优化 CS 的使用,同时改善 LMIC 的健康结果和满意度。这只能通过让所有参与分娩决策过程的利益相关者参与进来,并满足他们的需求和关切来实现。该研究将产生关于这种多方面干预措施的有效性和影响的有力证据。它还将评估干预措施的可接受性和可扩展性,以及妇女和提供者赋权的能力。

试验注册

ISRCTN67214403。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a200/7650262/39f96b9a5e75/13012_2020_1029_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a200/7650262/2df54b95c2fb/13012_2020_1029_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a200/7650262/f4d6d7411599/13012_2020_1029_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a200/7650262/2351a2af7510/13012_2020_1029_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a200/7650262/39f96b9a5e75/13012_2020_1029_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a200/7650262/2df54b95c2fb/13012_2020_1029_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a200/7650262/f4d6d7411599/13012_2020_1029_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a200/7650262/2351a2af7510/13012_2020_1029_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a200/7650262/39f96b9a5e75/13012_2020_1029_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation and evaluation of nonclinical interventions for appropriate use of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a multisite hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III trial.中低收入国家剖宫产术合理使用的非临床干预措施的实施和评估:一项多地点混合有效性实施 III 期试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 4;15(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01029-4.
2
Implementing the QUALI-DEC project in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Viet Nam: a process delineation and theory-driven process evaluation protocol.在阿根廷、布基纳法索、泰国和越南实施 QUALI-DEC 项目:一个过程描述和理论驱动的过程评估方案。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2290636. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2290636. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
3
How does hospital organisation influence the use of caesarean sections in low- and middle-income countries? A cross-sectional survey in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Vietnam for the QUALI-DEC project.医院组织如何影响中低收入国家的剖宫产使用?QUALI-DEC 项目在阿根廷、布基纳法索、泰国和越南的横断面调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06257-w.
4
Women's and health providers' perceptions of companionship during labor and childbirth: a formative study for the implementation of WHO companionship model in Burkina Faso.妇女和卫生保健提供者对分娩期间陪伴的看法:在布基纳法索实施世卫组织陪伴模式的基础研究。
Reprod Health. 2023 Mar 21;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01597-w.
5
Women's caesarean section preferences: A multicountry cross-sectional survey in low- and middle-income countries.妇女剖宫产偏好:中低收入国家的多国家横断面调查。
Midwifery. 2024 May;132:103979. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103979. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Implementing the WHO Labour Care Guide to reduce the use of Caesarean section in four hospitals in India: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial.实施世卫组织劳工关爱指南以减少印度四家医院的剖宫产率:一项实用、阶梯式、群组随机试点试验的方案和统计分析计划。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01525-4.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
9
Planning for scale: analysis of adaptations and contextual factors influencing scale-up of the QUALI-DEC intervention to optimize caesarean section use.规模化规划:对影响QUALI-DEC干预措施扩大规模以优化剖宫产使用的适应性及背景因素的分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 May 21;6(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00737-6.
10
Women's experiences of and satisfaction with childbirth: Development and validation of a measurement scale for low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家妇女的分娩经历与满意度:一种测量量表的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0322132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322132. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a universal implementation of labor companionship: a synthesis of the policy and facility environment of eight low-and-middle income countries.迈向劳动陪伴的普遍实施:八个低收入和中等收入国家的政策与设施环境综述
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 23;5:1550473. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1550473. eCollection 2025.
2
Women's experiences of and satisfaction with childbirth: Development and validation of a measurement scale for low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家妇女的分娩经历与满意度:一种测量量表的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0322132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322132. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Optimising the use of caesarean section: a generic formative research protocol for implementation preparation.优化剖宫产术的应用:实施准备的通用形成性研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2019 Nov 19;16(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0827-1.
2
Assessing scalability of an intervention: why, how and who?评估干预措施的可扩展性:为什么、如何以及由谁来评估?
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Sep 1;34(7):544-552. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz068.
3
A health knowledge brokering intervention in a district of Burkina Faso: A qualitative retrospective implementation analysis.
Planning for scale: analysis of adaptations and contextual factors influencing scale-up of the QUALI-DEC intervention to optimize caesarean section use.
规模化规划:对影响QUALI-DEC干预措施扩大规模以优化剖宫产使用的适应性及背景因素的分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 May 21;6(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00737-6.
4
Can the Robson Ten Group Classification System improve the understanding of maternity care in low-income countries? A cross-sectional study in Burkina Faso.罗布森十组分类系统能否增进对低收入国家孕产妇保健的理解?布基纳法索的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):e086892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086892.
5
Trends and determinants of caesarean section in South Asian countries: Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan.南亚国家(孟加拉国、尼泊尔和巴基斯坦)剖宫产的趋势及决定因素
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0311082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311082. eCollection 2024.
6
Exploring the acceptability of a decision aid for rural women with a history of prior cesarean birth regarding subsequent mode of birth in Coatepeque, Guatemala.探索危地马拉科阿特佩克地区有剖宫产史的农村妇女对于后续分娩方式决策辅助工具的接受度。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Oct 30;5:1261040. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1261040. eCollection 2024.
7
How does hospital organisation influence the use of caesarean sections in low- and middle-income countries? A cross-sectional survey in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Vietnam for the QUALI-DEC project.医院组织如何影响中低收入国家的剖宫产使用?QUALI-DEC 项目在阿根廷、布基纳法索、泰国和越南的横断面调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06257-w.
8
Implementing the QUALI-DEC project in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Viet Nam: a process delineation and theory-driven process evaluation protocol.在阿根廷、布基纳法索、泰国和越南实施 QUALI-DEC 项目:一个过程描述和理论驱动的过程评估方案。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2290636. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2290636. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
9
Low-Value Surgical Procedures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Scoping Review.中低收入国家的低价值手术操作:系统范围界定综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342215. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42215.
10
Assessment of a venous thromboembolism prophylaxis shared decision-making intervention (DASH-TOP) using the decisional conflict scale: a mixed-method study.采用决策冲突量表评估静脉血栓栓塞症预防共享决策干预(DASH-TOP):一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02349-3.
布基纳法索一地区的健康知识中介干预:定性回顾性实施分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 26;14(7):e0220105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220105. eCollection 2019.
4
Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis.分娩陪伴的认知与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 18;3(3):CD012449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2.
5
Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.减少健康妇女和婴儿不必要剖宫产的干预措施。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5.
6
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
7
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
8
Six dimensions of research trial acceptability: how much, what, when, in what circumstances, to whom and why?研究试验可接受性的六个维度:多少、什么、何时、在什么情况下、给谁和为什么?
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;213:190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.040. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
9
Women's and communities' views of targeted educational interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis.女性和社区对减少不必要剖宫产的针对性教育干预措施的看法:定性证据综合评价。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jul 24;15(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0570-z.
10
The 10-Group Classification System-a new way of thinking.十组分类系统——一种新的思维方式。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.026.