Department of Radiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital & Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1707-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07169-x. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
To compare the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions and analyze the correlations between the derived parameters and prognostic factors of breast cancer.
One hundred thirty-five women underwent breast APTWI and DKI. The magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)), apparent kurtosis coefficient (K), and non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (D) were calculated according to the histological subtype, grade, and prognostic factors (Ki-67, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), lymph node metastasis, and maximum lesion diameter). The differences, efficacy, and correlation between the parameters were determined.
The K value was higher and the D and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) values were lower in the malignant group than in the benign group (all p < 0.001; AUC (K) = 0.913, AUC (D) = 0.910, and AUC (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)) = 0.796). The differences in the AUC between K and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and between D and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) were significant (p = 0.023, 0.046). K was moderately correlated with the pathological grade (|r| = 0.724) and mildly correlated with Ki-67 and HER-2 expression (|r| = 0.454, 0.333). D was moderately correlated with the pathological grade (|r| = 0.648) and mildly correlated with Ki-67 expression (|r| = 0.400). MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was only mildly correlated with the pathological grade (|r| = 0.468).
DKI is superior to APTWI in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. Each parameter is correlated with some prognostic factors to a certain extent.
• DKI and APTWI provide valuable information regarding lesion characterization. • K, D, and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) are valid parameters for the characterization of tissue microstructure. • DKI is superior to APTWI in the study of breast cancer.
比较酰胺质子转移加权成像(APTWI)和扩散峰度成像(DKI)在鉴别良恶性乳腺病变中的价值,并分析衍生参数与乳腺癌预后因素之间的相关性。
对 135 例女性进行乳腺 APTWI 和 DKI 检查。根据组织学亚型、分级和预后因素(Ki-67、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体-2(HER-2)、淋巴结转移和最大病变直径)计算磁化传递率不对称(MTRasym(3.5 ppm))、表观峰度系数(K)和非高斯扩散系数(D)。比较参数之间的差异、效能和相关性。
恶性组的 K 值较高,D 值和 MTRasym(3.5 ppm)值较低,与良性组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.001;AUC(K)=0.913,AUC(D)=0.910,AUC(MTRasym(3.5 ppm))=0.796)。K 与 MTRasym(3.5 ppm)和 D 与 MTRasym(3.5 ppm)的 AUC 之间差异有统计学意义(P=0.023、0.046)。K 值与病理分级呈中度相关(|r|=0.724),与 Ki-67 和 HER-2 表达呈轻度相关(|r|=0.454、0.333)。D 值与病理分级呈中度相关(|r|=0.648),与 Ki-67 表达呈轻度相关(|r|=0.400)。MTRasym(3.5 ppm)仅与病理分级呈轻度相关(|r|=0.468)。
DKI 在鉴别良恶性乳腺病变方面优于 APTWI。各参数与部分预后因素在一定程度上相关。
• DKI 和 APTWI 为病变特征提供了有价值的信息。• K、D 和 MTRasym(3.5 ppm)是组织微观结构特征的有效参数。• DKI 在乳腺癌研究中优于 APTWI。