Suppr超能文献

酰胺质子转移加权成像评估子宫内膜癌组织学特征:与扩散峰度成像的对比研究。

Evaluation of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for endometrial carcinoma histological features: a comparative study with diffusion kurtosis imaging.

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital & Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8388-8398. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07966-y. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) can be used to evaluate endometrial carcinoma (EC) in terms of clinical type, histological grade, subtype, and Ki-67 index.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients with EC underwent pelvic DKI and APTWI. The non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (D), apparent kurtosis coefficient (K), and magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)) were calculated and compared based on the clinical type (type I, II), histological grade (high- and low-grade), and subtype (endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EA) and non-EA). Correlation coefficients were calculated for each parameter with histological grades and the Ki-67 index.

RESULTS

The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and K values were higher in the type II group and high-grade group than in the type I and low-grade groups, respectively, while the D values were lower in the type I and low-grade groups, respectively (all p < 0.05). The K value was higher in the EA group than in the non-EA group (p = 0.022). The K value was the only independent predictor for the histological grade of EA and the clinical type of EC. The AUC (DKI) was higher than the AUC (APTWI) in the identification of type I and II EC and high- and low-grade EA (Z = 2.042, 2.013, p = 0.041, 0.044), while in the identification of EA and non-EA, only the difference in K was statistically significant. Moreover, the K and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) values and D values correlated positively and negatively, respectively, with histological grade (r = 0.759, 0.555, 0.624, and 0.462, all p < 0.05) and Ki-67 index (r = -0.704, -0.507, all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both DKI- and APTWI-related parameters have potential as imaging markers in estimating the histological features of EC, while DKI shows better performance than APTWI in this study.

KEY POINTS

• DKI and APTWI can be used to preliminarily evaluate the histological characteristics of endometrial carcinoma (EC). • The K was the only independent predictor for the histological grade of EA and the clinical type of EC. • The K, MTRasym (3.5 ppm), and D correlated positively and negatively, respectively, with histological grade and Ki-67 index.

摘要

目的

探讨酰胺质子转移加权成像(APTWI)和扩散峰度成像(DKI)能否用于评估子宫内膜癌(EC)的临床类型、组织学分级、亚型和 Ki-67 指数。

方法

对 88 例 EC 患者进行盆腔 DKI 和 APTWI 检查。根据临床类型(I 型、II 型)、组织学分级(高、低分级)和亚型(子宫内膜样腺癌(EA)和非 EA)计算并比较非高斯扩散系数(D)、表观峰度系数(K)和磁化转移率不对称(MTRasym(3.5ppm))。计算各参数与组织学分级和 Ki-67 指数的相关系数。

结果

与 I 型和低分级组相比,II 型和高分级组的 MTRasym(3.5ppm)和 K 值较高,而 D 值较低(均 P<0.05)。与非 EA 组相比,EA 组的 K 值较高(P=0.022)。K 值是 EA 组织学分级和 EC 临床类型的唯一独立预测因子。在识别 I 型和 II 型 EC 以及高分级和低分级 EA 方面,DKI 的 AUC 高于 APTWI(Z=2.042、2.013,P=0.041、0.044),而在识别 EA 和非 EA 方面,仅 K 值具有统计学意义。此外,K 和 MTRasym(3.5ppm)值与组织学分级呈正相关,D 值呈负相关(r=0.759、0.555,均 P<0.05),与 Ki-67 指数呈负相关(r=-0.704、-0.507,均 P<0.05)。

结论

DKI 和 APTWI 相关参数具有作为评估 EC 组织学特征的成像标志物的潜力,而在本研究中,DKI 的表现优于 APTWI。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验