• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化门诊心脏病学护理:对死亡率和住院率的影响——一项比较观察性研究。

Intensified ambulatory cardiology care: effects on mortality and hospitalisation-a comparative observational study.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.

aQua, Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, 37073, Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71770-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-71770-9
PMID:32895445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7477232/
Abstract

Since 2010, an intensified ambulatory cardiology care programme has been implemented in southern Germany. To improve patient management, the structure of cardiac disease management was improved, guideline-recommended care was supported, new ambulatory medical services and a morbidity-adapted reimbursement system were set up. Our aim was to determine the effects of this programme on the mortality and hospitalisation of enrolled patients with cardiac disorders. We conducted a comparative observational study in 2015 and 2016, based on insurance claims data. Overall, 13,404 enrolled patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and 19,537 with coronary artery disease (CAD) were compared, respectively, to 8,776 and 16,696 patients that were receiving usual ambulatory cardiology care. Compared to the control group, patients enrolled in the programme had lower mortality (Hazard Ratio: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.91) and fewer all-cause hospitalisations (Rate Ratio: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90-0.97). CHF-related hospitalisations in patients with CHF were also reduced (Rate Ratio: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69-0.84). CAD patients showed a similar reduction in mortality rates (Hazard Ratio: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.76-0.88) and all-cause hospitalisation (Rate Ratio: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.97), but there was no effect on CAD-related hospitalisation. We conclude that intensified ambulatory care reduced mortality and hospitalisation in cardiology patients.

摘要

自 2010 年以来,德国南部实施了强化门诊心脏病学护理计划。为了改善患者管理,改进了心脏疾病管理结构,支持了指南推荐的护理,建立了新的门诊医疗服务和适应发病率的报销制度。我们的目的是确定该计划对患有心脏疾病的登记患者的死亡率和住院率的影响。我们根据保险索赔数据,于 2015 年和 2016 年进行了一项比较性观察研究。总体而言,分别比较了 13404 名慢性心力衰竭(CHF)和 19537 名冠心病(CAD)的登记患者,与接受常规门诊心脏病学护理的 8776 名和 16696 名患者相比。与对照组相比,参加该计划的患者死亡率较低(危险比:0.84;95%置信区间:0.77-0.91),全因住院率较低(率比:0.94;95%置信区间:0.90-0.97)。心力衰竭患者的心力衰竭相关住院治疗也减少(率比:0.76;95%置信区间:0.69-0.84)。CAD 患者的死亡率(危险比:0.81;95%置信区间:0.76-0.88)和全因住院率(率比:0.94;95%置信区间:0.91-0.97)也呈相似下降趋势,但 CAD 相关住院治疗没有影响。我们的结论是,强化门诊护理降低了心脏病患者的死亡率和住院率。

相似文献

1
Intensified ambulatory cardiology care: effects on mortality and hospitalisation-a comparative observational study.强化门诊心脏病学护理:对死亡率和住院率的影响——一项比较观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71770-9.
2
Differences in specialist consultations for cardiovascular disease by race, ethnicity, gender, insurance status, and site of primary care.心血管疾病专科会诊在种族、族裔、性别、保险状况及初级保健地点方面的差异。
Circulation. 2009 May 12;119(18):2463-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.825133. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
3
Effect of functional electrical stimulation on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure.功能性电刺激对慢性心力衰竭患者心血管结局的影响。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 May;24(8):833-839. doi: 10.1177/2047487316687428. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
Impact of a nurse-led home and clinic-based secondary prevention programme to prevent progressive cardiac dysfunction in high-risk individuals: the Nurse-led Intervention for Less Chronic Heart Failure (NIL-CHF) randomized controlled study.护士主导的家庭和诊所二级预防方案对高危人群预防进行性心功能障碍的影响:护士主导的减少慢性心力衰竭干预(NIL-CHF)随机对照研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Jun;17(6):620-30. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.272. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
5
Mortality and morbidity 1 year after stopping a remote patient management intervention: extended follow-up results from the telemedical interventional management in patients with heart failure II (TIM-HF2) randomised trial.停止远程患者管理干预措施 1 年后的死亡率和发病率:心力衰竭远程医疗干预管理 II 试验(TIM-HF2)的扩展随访结果。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jan;2(1):e16-e24. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30195-5. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
6
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for chronic heart failure: the EXTRAMATCH II individual participant data meta-analysis.基于运动的慢性心力衰竭心脏康复:EXTRAMATCH II 个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(25):1-98. doi: 10.3310/hta23250.
7
Swiss Interdisciplinary Management Programme for Heart Failure (SWIM-HF): a randomised controlled trial study of an outpatient inter-professional management programme for heart failure patients in Switzerland.瑞士心力衰竭跨学科管理方案(SWIM-HF):一项针对瑞士心力衰竭患者的门诊跨专业管理方案的随机对照试验研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Mar 8;141:w13171. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13171. eCollection 2011.
8
Impact Evaluation of a System-Wide Chronic Disease Management Program on Health Service Utilisation: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.一项全系统慢性病管理项目对卫生服务利用影响的评估:一项倾向匹配队列研究
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 7;13(6):e1002035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002035. eCollection 2016 Jun.
9
Current management and treatment of patients with stable coronary artery diseases presenting to cardiologists in different clinical contexts: A prospective, observational, nationwide study.当前在不同临床环境下心内科医生对稳定型冠心病患者的管理和治疗:一项前瞻性、观察性、全国性研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Jan;25(1):43-53. doi: 10.1177/2047487317740663. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
10
Coronary artery disease prevalence and outcome in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure: an observational report from seven Middle Eastern countries.急性心力衰竭住院患者的冠心病患病率及预后:来自七个中东国家的观察性报告。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2016 Dec;44(5):242-251. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1246945. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Health behavior and disease self-management indicators in patients with cardiovascular diseases using a health app: Findings from an RCT.使用健康应用程序的心血管疾病患者的健康行为和疾病自我管理指标:一项随机对照试验的结果
AIMS Public Health. 2025 Feb 26;12(1):233-258. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025015. eCollection 2025.
2
Collaborative Ambulatory Orthopaedic Care in Patients with Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study on Health Utilisation and Economic Outcomes.髋膝关节骨关节炎患者的协作式门诊骨科护理:一项关于健康利用和经济结果的回顾性比较队列研究
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Jun 2;23(2):22. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6442. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing coordinated ambulatory cardiology care in southern Germany: a mixed-methods study.在德国南部实施协调的门诊心脏病学护理:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4832-4.
2
Strong primary care and patients' survival.强有力的基层医疗与患者的生存。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 26;9(1):10859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47344-9.
3
Association Between Specialist Office Visits and Health Expenditures in Accountable Care Organizations.在责任医疗组织中,专家门诊就诊与医疗支出的关系。
Use of big data from health insurance for assessment of cardiovascular outcomes.
利用健康保险大数据评估心血管疾病转归。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 May 3;6:1155404. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1155404. eCollection 2023.
4
[Intensified collaborative care: a model of successful acting in ambulatory cardiology].[强化协作护理:门诊心脏病学中的成功模式]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2022 Sep;63(9):930-938. doi: 10.1007/s00108-022-01385-x. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
5
Differences in opioid prescription rates between patients with musculoskeletal disorders enrolled in coordinated ambulatory healthcare and patients receiving usual care: a retrospective observational cohort study.接受协调门诊医疗保健的肌肉骨骼疾病患者与接受常规护理的患者之间阿片类药物处方率的差异:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 8;12(8):e062657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062657.
6
Evaluation of a collaborative ambulatory orthopedic care program for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparative observational cohort study.评估髋膝关节骨关节炎患者协作式门诊骨科护理方案:一项比较观察性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 3;23(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05697-9.
7
Implementation of a Managed Care Programme in Germany Using the Example of the Baden-Wuerttemberg Contract on Care in the Field of Cardiology.以巴登-符腾堡州心脏病护理领域护理合同为例,德国实施管理式医疗计划。
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Apr 29;22(2):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6470. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
8
General practitioner-centred paediatric primary care reduces risk of hospitalisation for mental disorders in children and adolescents with ADHD: findings from a retrospective cohort study.以全科医生为中心的儿科初级保健可降低 ADHD 儿童和青少年住院治疗精神障碍的风险:一项回顾性队列研究的结果。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):150-156. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2082409.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6796.
4
The development of diabetes complications in GP-centered healthcare.糖尿病并发症在以全科医生为中心的医疗保健中的发展。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jul;24(7):322-327.
5
Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study.一项加强全科医疗护理对住院率影响的项目:一项比较性观察研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Jun;36(2):109-114. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1459429. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017.欧洲心脏病学会:《2017年心血管疾病统计数据》
Eur Heart J. 2018 Feb 14;39(7):508-579. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx628.
7
Payment Reform to Enhance Collaboration of Primary Care and Cardiology: A Review.支付方式改革促进基层医疗与心脏病学协同发展:综述
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;3(1):77-83. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4308.
8
Evaluation of a program to strengthen general practice care for patients with chronic disease in Germany.德国一项加强慢性病患者全科医疗护理项目的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2000-2.
9
A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen).德国二次数据分析报告标准共识,第2版(STROSA - 二次数据分析标准化报告流程)
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Sep;78(S 01):e145-e160. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108647. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
10
Long-term healthcare use and costs in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a population-based cohort using linked health records (CALIBER).稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的长期医疗使用情况及费用:一项基于人群的队列研究,利用关联健康记录(CALIBER)
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016 Jan 20;2(2):125-140. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw003.