Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
aQua, Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, 37073, Goettingen, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71770-9.
Since 2010, an intensified ambulatory cardiology care programme has been implemented in southern Germany. To improve patient management, the structure of cardiac disease management was improved, guideline-recommended care was supported, new ambulatory medical services and a morbidity-adapted reimbursement system were set up. Our aim was to determine the effects of this programme on the mortality and hospitalisation of enrolled patients with cardiac disorders. We conducted a comparative observational study in 2015 and 2016, based on insurance claims data. Overall, 13,404 enrolled patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and 19,537 with coronary artery disease (CAD) were compared, respectively, to 8,776 and 16,696 patients that were receiving usual ambulatory cardiology care. Compared to the control group, patients enrolled in the programme had lower mortality (Hazard Ratio: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.91) and fewer all-cause hospitalisations (Rate Ratio: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90-0.97). CHF-related hospitalisations in patients with CHF were also reduced (Rate Ratio: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69-0.84). CAD patients showed a similar reduction in mortality rates (Hazard Ratio: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.76-0.88) and all-cause hospitalisation (Rate Ratio: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.97), but there was no effect on CAD-related hospitalisation. We conclude that intensified ambulatory care reduced mortality and hospitalisation in cardiology patients.
自 2010 年以来,德国南部实施了强化门诊心脏病学护理计划。为了改善患者管理,改进了心脏疾病管理结构,支持了指南推荐的护理,建立了新的门诊医疗服务和适应发病率的报销制度。我们的目的是确定该计划对患有心脏疾病的登记患者的死亡率和住院率的影响。我们根据保险索赔数据,于 2015 年和 2016 年进行了一项比较性观察研究。总体而言,分别比较了 13404 名慢性心力衰竭(CHF)和 19537 名冠心病(CAD)的登记患者,与接受常规门诊心脏病学护理的 8776 名和 16696 名患者相比。与对照组相比,参加该计划的患者死亡率较低(危险比:0.84;95%置信区间:0.77-0.91),全因住院率较低(率比:0.94;95%置信区间:0.90-0.97)。心力衰竭患者的心力衰竭相关住院治疗也减少(率比:0.76;95%置信区间:0.69-0.84)。CAD 患者的死亡率(危险比:0.81;95%置信区间:0.76-0.88)和全因住院率(率比:0.94;95%置信区间:0.91-0.97)也呈相似下降趋势,但 CAD 相关住院治疗没有影响。我们的结论是,强化门诊护理降低了心脏病患者的死亡率和住院率。