Suppr超能文献

烟草依赖治疗指南的批判性评价。

Critical appraisal of tobacco dependence treatment guidelines.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, 2713, Doha, Qatar.

Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Feb;43(1):85-100. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01110-4. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

Abstract

Background Tobacco use is a leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of tobacco use dependence are of varied scope and quality, making it challenging for users to select and apply recommendations. Objective The study objective is to identify and critically appraise the quality of existing clinical practice guidelines for tobacco cessation. Setting The study occurred between collaborative academic institutions located in Qatar and New Zealand. Methods A systematic literature search was performed for the period 2006-2018 through the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, National Guideline Clearing House, Campbell Library, Health System Evidence, Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence-Based Practice Database, Academic Search Complete, ProQuest, PROSPERO, and Google Scholar. Relevant professional societies' and health agencies' websites were also searched. Two reviewers independently extracted and assessed guidelines' quality using Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Main outcome measure Standardized domain scores according to the AGREE II instrument. Results 7741 hits were identified. After removing duplicates and screening, 24 guidelines were included. Highest guideline quality was for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline with an overall ranking score of 87.56% and least quality was for Japanese Circulation Society Joint Working Group with an overall score of 29.34%. Domain 4 of AGREE II (clarity of presentation) had the highest average quality score (70.95%), while the lowest average quality scores were for Domain 2 (Rigour of Development) (50.21%) and Domain 5 (Applicability) (45.05%). Conclusion Seven guidelines were judged to be of high quality (overall score of ≥ 70%). Future guidelines for tobacco dependence treatment should use rigorous methods of development and provide applicable recommendations.

摘要

背景

吸烟是全球可预防的发病率和死亡率的主要原因。治疗烟草使用依赖的临床实践指南范围和质量各异,这使得用户难以选择和应用建议。

目的

本研究旨在确定和批判性评估现有的烟草戒烟临床实践指南的质量。

地点

本研究在位于卡塔尔和新西兰的合作学术机构进行。

方法

通过以下数据库进行了 2006 年至 2018 年的系统文献检索:PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、ISI Web of Science、Scopus、国家指南清理中心、坎贝尔图书馆、卫生系统证据、乔安娜·布里格斯研究所循证实践数据库、学术搜索完整、ProQuest、PROSPERO 和谷歌学术。还搜索了相关专业协会和卫生机构的网站。两位审查员独立使用评估指南、研究和评价 II(AGREE II)工具提取和评估指南的质量。

主要结果测量标准

根据 AGREE II 工具的标准化领域得分。

结果

共确定了 7741 个命中。去除重复项和筛选后,纳入了 24 项指南。NICE 指南的指南质量最高,总体排名得分为 87.56%,日本循环学会联合工作组的指南质量最低,总体得分为 29.34%。AGREE II 的第 4 个领域(表述清晰度)的平均质量得分最高(70.95%),而第 2 个领域(开发严谨性)(50.21%)和第 5 个领域(适用性)(45.05%)的平均质量得分最低。

结论

有 7 项指南被认为质量较高(总分≥70%)。未来治疗烟草依赖的指南应使用严谨的开发方法并提供适用的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0773/7878272/bfc08f10f950/11096_2020_1110_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验