Nieminen Pentti, Uma Eswara, Pal Sudipta, Laitala Marja-Liisa, Lappalainen Olli-Pekka, Varghese Eby
Medical Informatics and Data Analysis Research Group, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland.
Faculty of Dentistry, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), 75150 Melaka, Malaysia.
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Sep 3;8(3):103. doi: 10.3390/dj8030103.
A fundamental skill in education includes the ability to search for, evaluate, and synthesize information, and this cannot be underestimated in dental education. The aim of this study was to assess how dental students from Malaysia and Finland acquire scientific information and to compare their information retrieval skills.
Fourth and fifth-year dental students from Malaysia and Finland were invited to participate. A self-administered structured questionnaire including items about the use of information sources, subjective assessment of literature retrieval skills and knowledge was used.
A total of 226 dental students participated in the survey: 131 from Malaysia and 95 from Finland. In both countries, the highest interest for data retrieval among students was found in the oral surgery specialty. The three most used sources of information among Malaysian students were personal lecture notes, dental textbooks, and colleagues; while Finnish students used colleagues, lecture notes, and current clinical guidelines. Students' knowledge of evidence-based practice was inadequate in both student groups. Though the majority of participants reported that they had good or passable skills in literature retrieval, more students from Finland judged themselves to have at least good skills compared to those from Malaysia.
Dental education in both countries includes information retrieval studies and mandatory research projects. However, students did not often use those sources that are considered essential in evidence-based dentistry. Universities should further develop educational and training interventions that guide students to use knowledge resources more effectively for critically appraising scientific evidence.
教育中的一项基本技能包括搜索、评估和综合信息的能力,这在牙科教育中不可低估。本研究的目的是评估马来西亚和芬兰的牙科学生如何获取科学信息,并比较他们的信息检索技能。
邀请马来西亚和芬兰的四年级和五年级牙科学生参与。使用了一份自我管理的结构化问卷,其中包括有关信息来源使用情况、文献检索技能和知识的主观评估等项目。
共有226名牙科学生参与了调查,其中131名来自马来西亚,95名来自芬兰。在这两个国家,学生对数据检索兴趣最高的是口腔外科专业。马来西亚学生最常使用的三种信息来源是个人课堂笔记、牙科教材和同事;而芬兰学生使用同事、课堂笔记和当前临床指南。两个学生群体对循证实践的知识都不足。尽管大多数参与者报告说他们在文献检索方面有良好或尚可的技能,但与马来西亚学生相比,更多芬兰学生认为自己至少有良好的技能。
两国的牙科教育都包括信息检索研究和必修研究项目。然而,学生并不经常使用那些在循证牙科中被认为至关重要的信息来源。大学应进一步开展教育和培训干预措施,引导学生更有效地利用知识资源来批判性地评估科学证据。