Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305;
National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 22;117(38):23484-23489. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000804117. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
While over 240,000 American students experienced a school shooting in the last two decades, little is known about the impacts of these events on the mental health of surviving youth. Using large-scale prescription data from 2006 to 2015, we examine the effects of 44 school shootings on youth antidepressant use. Our empirical strategy compares the number of antidepressant prescriptions written by providers practicing 0 to 5 miles from a school that experienced a shooting (treatment areas) to the number of prescriptions written by providers practicing 10 to 15 miles away (reference areas), both before and after the shooting. We include month-by-year and school-by-area fixed effects in all specifications, thereby controlling for overall trends in antidepressant use and all time-invariant differences across locations. We find that local exposure to fatal school shootings increases youth antidepressant use by 21.4% in the following 2 y. These effects are smaller in areas with a higher density of mental health providers who focus on behavioral, rather than pharmacological, interventions.
在过去的二十年里,超过 24 万名美国学生经历了校园枪击事件,但人们对这些事件对幸存青少年心理健康的影响知之甚少。利用 2006 年至 2015 年的大规模处方数据,我们研究了 44 起校园枪击事件对青少年抗抑郁药使用的影响。我们的实证策略比较了在经历枪击事件的学校 0 到 5 英里范围内(治疗区)和在 10 到 15 英里范围内(参照区)执业的医生开出的抗抑郁药处方数量,包括枪击事件发生前后。我们在所有规格中都包含逐月和按学校区域的固定效应,从而控制了抗抑郁药使用的总体趋势和所有地点的不变差异。我们发现,当地遭遇致命的校园枪击事件会使青少年在接下来的 2 年内增加 21.4%的抗抑郁药使用。在心理健康服务提供者密度较高的地区,这些影响较小,这些提供者更关注行为干预,而不是药物干预。