残疾歧视、医疗资源分配与新冠疫情
Disability Discrimination, Medical Rationing and COVID-19.
作者信息
Chen Bo, McNamara Donna Marie
机构信息
Faculty of Law, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Newcastle Law School, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
出版信息
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Sep 3;12(4):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00147-x. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Abstract
The current public health crisis has exposed deep cracks in social equality and justice for marginalised and vulnerable communities around the world. The reported rise in the number of 'do not resuscitate' orders being imposed on people with disabilities has caused particular concerns from a human rights perspective. While the evidence of this is contested, this article will consider the human rights implications at stake and the dangers associated with using 'quality of life' measures as determinant of care in medical decision-making and triage assessments.
摘要
当前的公共卫生危机暴露了全球边缘化和弱势群体在社会平等与正义方面的深刻裂痕。有报道称，针对残疾人下达的“不要复苏”指令数量有所增加，这从人权角度引发了特别关注。尽管这一情况的证据存在争议，但本文将探讨其中涉及的人权问题，以及在医疗决策和分诊评估中使用“生活质量”指标作为护理决定因素所带来的风险。
相似文献
1
Disability Discrimination, Medical Rationing and COVID-19.残疾歧视、医疗资源分配与新冠疫情
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Sep 3;12(4):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00147-x. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
No body is expendable: Medical rationing and disability justice during the COVID-19 pandemic.无人可被牺牲：新冠疫情大流行期间的医疗配给与残疾正义
Am Psychol. 2021 Apr;76(3):451-461. doi: 10.1037/amp0000709. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
3
Mental health and inequity: a human rights approach to inequality, discrimination, and mental disability.心理健康与不平等：从人权角度看待不平等、歧视和精神残疾
Health Hum Rights. 2009;11(2):19-31.
4
Ruthless Utilitarianism? COVID-19 State Triage Protocols May Subject Patients to Racial Discrimination and Providers to Legal Liability.无情的功利主义？COVID-19 国家分诊协议可能使患者面临种族歧视，使医护人员面临法律责任。
Am J Law Med. 2021 Jul;47(2-3):264-290. doi: 10.1017/amj.2021.17.
5
Disability ethics in the coronavirus crisis.新冠疫情下的残疾伦理
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 May 31;9(5):2167-2171. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_588_20. eCollection 2020 May.
6
Collision of Fundamental Human Rights and the Right to Health Access During the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic.在新型冠状病毒大流行期间，基本人权与健康权的冲突。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;8:570243. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.570243. eCollection 2020.
7
Shades of dignity: exploring the demands of equality in applying human rights frameworks to health.尊严的色彩：在将人权框架应用于健康时探索平等的需求。
Health Hum Rights. 2009;11(2):1-18.
8
Nurses' involvement in 'do not resuscitate' decisions on acute elder care wards.护士在急性老年护理病房参与“不要复苏”决策。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Feb;57(4):404-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04090.x.
9
Disability, Disablism, and COVID-19 Pandemic Triage.残疾、残疾歧视与 COVID-19 大流行分诊。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):601-605. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10005-y. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
10
An ethical analysis of clinical triage protocols and decision-making frameworks: what do the principles of justice, freedom, and a disability rights approach demand of us?临床分诊协议和决策框架的伦理分析：正义、自由和平等权利原则对我们有何要求？
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Feb 11;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00749-0.
引用本文的文献
1
'The Norm Is to Not Openly Collaborate': Using the Lens of Co-Production to Evaluate the Development of a COVID-19 ICU Triage Policy.“规范是不公开合作”：用共同生产的视角评估 COVID-19 重症监护室分诊政策的制定。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14159. doi: 10.1111/hex.14159.
2
Disability, Discrimination, and Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Stress Process Model.新冠疫情期间的残疾、歧视与心理健康：一个压力过程模型
Soc Ment Health. 2022 Nov;12(3):215-229. doi: 10.1177/21568693221115347.
3
Medical delivery without representation?: Examining disability representation within the healthcare community.医疗服务无代表？审视医疗界中的残疾群体代表性问题
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2024;17(1):3-7. doi: 10.3233/PRM-240013.
4
Comparison of artificial intelligence-assisted informed consent obtained before coronary angiography with the conventional method: Medical competence and ethical assessment.冠状动脉造影术前人工智能辅助获取知情同意书与传统方法的比较：医学能力与伦理评估
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 30;9:20552076231218141. doi: 10.1177/20552076231218141. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
COVID-19, people with disabilities, and the Italian government recovery: investigating the impact and promoting psychological resources to prevent future emergencies.新冠疫情、残疾人与意大利政府的经济复苏：探究影响并促进心理资源以预防未来的紧急情况
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 25;14:1260853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260853. eCollection 2023.
6
Disability-a chronic omission in health equity that must be central to Canada's post-pandemic recovery.残疾问题——卫生公平领域中一个长期存在的疏漏，必须成为加拿大后疫情时代复苏的核心议题。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2023 Jun;43(6):348-351. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.43.7.05.
7
Increasing Diversity of Patients in Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials.增加放射肿瘤学临床试验患者的多样性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 May 1;116(1):103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.044. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
8
Exploring the impact of shielding advice on the wellbeing of individuals identified as clinically extremely vulnerable amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.探讨在 COVID-19 大流行期间，针对被临床认定为极脆弱的个体的屏蔽建议对其健康的影响：一项混合方法评估。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):2145. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14368-2.
9
End of life care in UK care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.英国疫情期间养老院的临终关怀：一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jun 1;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00979-4.
10
Ethics framework and recommendations to support capabilities of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities during pandemics.支持智力和发育障碍者在大流行期间能力的伦理框架及建议。
J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2022 Mar;19(1):116-124. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12413. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
本文引用的文献
1
Age Matters but it should not be Used to Discriminate Against the Elderly in Allocating Scarce Resources in the Context of COVID-19.年龄很重要，但在新冠疫情背景下分配稀缺资源时，不应以此为由歧视老年人。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Jun 16;12(3):331-340. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00130-6. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Distributive justice during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Australia.澳大利亚2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间的分配正义。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jun;90(6):961-962. doi: 10.1111/ans.16069. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
3
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源的公平分配
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions.稀缺医疗干预措施的分配原则。
Lancet. 2009 Jan 31;373(9661):423-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60137-9.
5
Disability, disparate impact, and class actions.残疾、差异影响与集体诉讼。
Duke Law J. 2006 Dec;56(3):861-922.
6
Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.选择与权利：优生学、遗传学与残疾平等
Disabil Soc. 1998 Nov;13(5):665-81. doi: 10.1080/09687599826452.
7
8
Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: conflicts between physicians' practices and patients' wishes.美国重症监护医师关于限制或继续维持生命治疗的决策：医师的做法与患者意愿之间的冲突。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Feb;151(2 Pt 1):288-92. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.2.7842181.
9
Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy.迈向残疾政策必要的普遍化。
Milbank Q. 1989;67 Suppl 2 Pt 2:401-28.
Zotero 插件