• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄很重要,但在新冠疫情背景下分配稀缺资源时,不应以此为由歧视老年人。

Age Matters but it should not be Used to Discriminate Against the Elderly in Allocating Scarce Resources in the Context of COVID-19.

作者信息

de Castro-Hamoy Leniza, de Castro Leonardo D

机构信息

National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.

Department of Pediatrics, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.

出版信息

Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Jun 16;12(3):331-340. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00130-6. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.1007/s41649-020-00130-6
PMID:32837555
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7298697/
Abstract

A patient's age serves as a very useful guide to physicians in deciding what disease manifestations to anticipate, what treatment to offer for certain conditions, and how to prepare for possible emergencies. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, determining treatment options on the basis of a patient's chronological age can easily give rise to unjustified discrimination. This is of particular significance in situations where the allocation of scarce critical care resources could have a direct impact on who will live and who will die. This paper examines the fairness of recommendations contained in resource allocation guidelines in the Philippines that have implications for the way elderly patients could be treated or excluded from some forms of critical care treatment in the context of the ongoing Corona virus emergency.

摘要

患者的年龄对医生而言是一个非常有用的参考,有助于他们判断可能出现的疾病症状、针对特定病症应采取何种治疗方法以及如何应对可能出现的紧急情况。在新冠疫情背景下,根据患者的实际年龄来确定治疗方案很容易导致不合理的歧视。在稀缺的重症监护资源分配可能直接影响生死的情况下,这一点尤为重要。本文探讨了菲律宾资源分配指南中所包含建议的公平性,这些建议对在当前新冠疫情紧急情况下老年患者接受某些形式的重症监护治疗或被排除在外的方式产生影响。

相似文献

1
Age Matters but it should not be Used to Discriminate Against the Elderly in Allocating Scarce Resources in the Context of COVID-19.年龄很重要,但在新冠疫情背景下分配稀缺资源时,不应以此为由歧视老年人。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Jun 16;12(3):331-340. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00130-6. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Public attitudes toward allocating scarce resources in the COVID-19 pandemic.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源分配的态度。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0240651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240651. eCollection 2020.
3
Weighted Lotteries and the Allocation of Scarce Medications for Covid-19.新冠疫情期间稀缺药物的加权彩票分配
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51(1):39-46. doi: 10.1002/hast.1218.
4
Allocation of scarce resources during mass casualty events.大规模伤亡事件中的稀缺资源分配。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Jun(207):1-305.
5
A fair allocation approach to the ethics of scarce resources in the context of a pandemic: The need to prioritize the worst-off in the Philippines.在大流行背景下,公平分配稀缺资源的伦理方法:菲律宾需要优先考虑处境最差的人群。
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Dec;21(4):153-172. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12293. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
6
Ethical factors determining ECMO allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic.伦理因素在 COVID-19 大流行期间决定 ECMO 的分配。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 1;22(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00638-y.
7
Public preferences for allocating absolute scarce critical healthcare resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.公众在 COVID-19 大流行期间对分配绝对稀缺的关键医疗保健资源的偏好。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 May 25;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2020-0494.
8
Crisis Standards of Care Guidelines for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Fresno Resource Allocation Guide (FRAG).《COVID-19大流行期间危机护理标准指南:弗雷斯诺资源分配指南(FRAG)》
Cureus. 2021 Nov 17;13(11):e19662. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19662. eCollection 2021 Nov.
9
An Ethics of Justice in Elderly Care: Ageism and the Covid-19 Pandemic.老年护理中的正义伦理:年龄歧视与新冠疫情
Community Health Equity Res Policy. 2025 Apr;45(3):237-243. doi: 10.1177/2752535X231219017. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
10
Protecting providers and patients: results of an Internet survey of health care workers' risk perceptions and ethical concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic.保护医护人员与患者:新冠疫情期间医护人员风险认知与伦理关切的网络调查结果
Int J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 24;14(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12245-021-00341-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Ageism and lookism as stereotypes of health disparity in intensive care units in Iran: a critical ethnography.年龄歧视和外貌歧视是伊朗重症监护病房健康差异的刻板印象:一项批判性民族志研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jun 3;23(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02180-w.
2
Triage in Times of COVID-19: A Moral Dilemma.新冠疫情时期的分诊:道德困境。
J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Dec;63(4):560-576. doi: 10.1177/00221465221080958. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
3
Quality of life in elderly ICU survivors before the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.新冠疫情大流行之前老年重症监护病房幸存者的生活质量:一项队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):e045086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045086.
4
A spark of hope: histopathological and functional recovery after critical COVID-19.一丝希望之光:重症新型冠状病毒肺炎后的组织病理学及功能恢复
Infection. 2022 Feb;50(1):263-267. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01678-7. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
COVID-19: instruments for the allocation of mechanical ventilators-a narrative review.COVID-19:机械呼吸机分配工具——叙述性综述。
Crit Care. 2020 Sep 29;24(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03298-3.
6
Disability Discrimination, Medical Rationing and COVID-19.残疾歧视、医疗资源分配与新冠疫情
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Sep 3;12(4):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00147-x. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
Enacting Bioethics.制定生物伦理学。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Jul 29;12(3):253-255. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00141-3. eCollection 2020 Sep.