• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奖励前景的顺序变化如何调节元控制:增加奖励前景促进认知灵活性。

How Sequentially Changing Reward Prospect Modulates Meta-control: Increasing Reward Prospect Promotes Cognitive Flexibility.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jun;21(3):534-548. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00825-1.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-020-00825-1
PMID:32901401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8208935/
Abstract

Meta-control is necessary to regulate the balance between cognitive stability and flexibility. Evidence from (voluntary) task switching studies suggests performance-contingent reward as one modulating factor. Depending on the immediate reward history, reward prospect seems to promote either cognitive stability or flexibility: Increasing reward prospect reduced switch costs and increased the voluntary switch rate, suggesting increased cognitive flexibility. In contrast, remaining high reward prospect increased switch costs and reduced the voluntary switch rate, suggesting increased cognitive stability. Recently we suggested that increasing reward prospect serves as a meta-control signal toward cognitive flexibility by lowering the updating threshold in working memory. However, in task switching paradigms with two tasks only, this could alternatively be explained by facilitated switching to the other of two tasks. To address this issue, a series of task switching experiments with uncued task switching between three univalent tasks was conducted. Results showed a reduction in reaction time (RT) switch costs to a nonsignificant difference and a high voluntary switch rate when reward prospect increased, whereas repetition RTs were faster, switch RTs slower, and voluntary switch rate was reduced when reward prospect remained high. That is, increasing reward prospect put participants in a state of equal readiness to respond to any target stimulus-be it a task repetition or a switch to one of the other two tasks. The study thus provides further evidence for the assumption that increasing reward prospect serves as a meta-control signal to increase cognitive flexibility, presumably by lowering the updating threshold in working memory.

摘要

元控制对于调节认知稳定性和灵活性之间的平衡是必要的。来自(自愿)任务转换研究的证据表明,绩效相关的奖励是一个调节因素。根据即时奖励历史,奖励前景似乎促进了认知的稳定性或灵活性:增加奖励前景降低了转换成本,增加了自愿转换率,表明认知灵活性增加。相反,保持高奖励前景增加了转换成本,降低了自愿转换率,表明认知稳定性增加。最近,我们提出增加奖励前景通过降低工作记忆中的更新阈值来作为认知灵活性的元控制信号。然而,在只有两个任务的任务转换范式中,这也可以通过更容易地切换到两个任务中的另一个任务来解释。为了解决这个问题,进行了一系列具有三个单一任务的无提示任务转换的任务转换实验。结果表明,当奖励前景增加时,反应时间(RT)转换成本降低到无显著差异,自愿转换率很高,而重复 RT 更快,转换 RT 更慢,自愿转换率降低当奖励前景保持高位时。也就是说,增加奖励前景使参与者处于对任何目标刺激做出反应的同等准备状态——无论是任务重复还是切换到其他两个任务之一。因此,该研究进一步证明了这样的假设,即增加奖励前景作为一种元控制信号,通过降低工作记忆中的更新阈值,增加认知灵活性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/9e142c4f7dd9/13415_2020_825_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/1800a68f2894/13415_2020_825_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/b6a405c69e1f/13415_2020_825_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/111caec07f9c/13415_2020_825_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/75ed45c31ed3/13415_2020_825_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/5aaa3632e731/13415_2020_825_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/9e142c4f7dd9/13415_2020_825_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/1800a68f2894/13415_2020_825_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/b6a405c69e1f/13415_2020_825_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/111caec07f9c/13415_2020_825_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/75ed45c31ed3/13415_2020_825_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/5aaa3632e731/13415_2020_825_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/8208935/9e142c4f7dd9/13415_2020_825_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How Sequentially Changing Reward Prospect Modulates Meta-control: Increasing Reward Prospect Promotes Cognitive Flexibility.奖励前景的顺序变化如何调节元控制:增加奖励前景促进认知灵活性。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jun;21(3):534-548. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00825-1.
2
Increasing reward prospect promotes cognitive flexibility: Direct evidence from voluntary task switching with double registration.奖励前景增加促进认知灵活性:来自双重登记自愿任务转换的直接证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):1926-1944. doi: 10.1177/1747021818819449. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
3
How sequential changes in reward magnitude modulate cognitive flexibility: Evidence from voluntary task switching.奖励幅度的顺序变化如何调节认知灵活性:来自自愿任务切换的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):285-295. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000166. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
4
How sequential changes in reward expectation modulate cognitive control: Pupillometry as a tool to monitor dynamic changes in reward expectation.奖励预期的顺序变化如何调节认知控制:瞳孔测量作为监测奖励预期动态变化的工具。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 Feb;148:35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
5
Investigating anticipatory processes during sequentially changing reward prospect: An ERP study.在顺序变化的奖励前景下研究预期过程:一项 ERP 研究。
Brain Cogn. 2021 Dec;155:105815. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105815. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching in different reward contexts?自上而下的影响在不同奖励情境下的自愿任务转换中吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jun;217:103312. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103312. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
Emotional modulation of control dilemmas: the role of positive affect, reward, and dopamine in cognitive stability and flexibility.控制困境的情绪调节:积极情绪、奖励和多巴胺在认知稳定性与灵活性中的作用
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Sep;62:403-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
The dynamic balance between cognitive flexibility and stability: the influence of local changes in reward expectation and global task context on voluntary switch rate.认知灵活性与稳定性之间的动态平衡:奖励期望的局部变化和全局任务背景对自愿转换率的影响。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):65-77. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0922-2. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
9
How performance-contingent reward prospect modulates cognitive control: Increased cue maintenance at the cost of decreased flexibility.绩效 contingent 奖励预期如何调节认知控制:以灵活性降低为代价增加线索维持。 (注:这里“contingent”常见释义为“依情况而定的” ,但在这个语境中可能是特定术语,可根据具体医学专业背景进一步准确理解和调整表述 )
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(10):1643-1658. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000397. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
10
Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness.巩固对习得的转换准备影响最小。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(10):1622-1637. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001074. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Monitoring-Based Rewards Enhance Both Learning Performance and Metacognitive Monitoring Accuracy.基于监测的奖励既能提高学习成绩,又能提升元认知监测的准确性。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 5;15(3):307. doi: 10.3390/bs15030307.
2
Self-guided transitions and creative idea search: adaptively choosing flexibility versus persistence in divergent and convergent thinking tasks.自我引导的转变与创意搜索:在发散性和聚合性思维任务中适应性地选择灵活性与坚持性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 19;12(3):241394. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241394. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The Impact of Immediate and Delayed Rewards on Task-Switching Performance.

本文引用的文献

1
How sequential changes in reward expectation modulate cognitive control: Pupillometry as a tool to monitor dynamic changes in reward expectation.奖励预期的顺序变化如何调节认知控制:瞳孔测量作为监测奖励预期动态变化的工具。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 Feb;148:35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
2
Prospect of performance-contingent reward distorts the action relevance of predictive context information.表现关联型奖励的前景扭曲了预测性情境信息的行为相关性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Feb;46(2):380-399. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000727. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
3
Shielding and relaxation in multitasking: Prospect of reward counteracts relaxation of task shielding in multitasking.
即时奖励和延迟奖励对任务切换表现的影响。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 21;15(2):100. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020100.
4
Cognitive Control.认知控制
Annu Rev Psychol. 2025 Jan;76(1):167-195. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-022024-103901. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
5
Insights into control over cognitive flexibility from studies of task-switching.从任务转换研究中洞察对认知灵活性的控制
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2024 Feb;55. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101342. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
6
Task performance errors and rewards affect voluntary task choices.任务表现错误和奖励会影响自愿选择任务。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):892-909. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01908-7. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
7
Reward-based modulation of task-switching performance: a diffusion model analysis.基于奖励的任务转换性能调节:扩散模型分析。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Feb;86(2):680-706. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02711-7. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
8
Performance-contingent reward increases the use of congruent distracting information.绩效相关的奖励会增加对一致分心信息的使用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):905-929. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02682-9. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
9
Well under control: Control demand changes are sufficient for metacontrol.良好控制:控制需求变化足以实现元控制。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1032304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1032304. eCollection 2022.
10
Using position rather than color at the traffic light - Covariation learning-based deviation from instructions in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.使用交通信号灯的位置而非颜色——基于协变学习的注意力缺陷/多动障碍中偏离指令的情况
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 7;13:967467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967467. eCollection 2022.
多任务处理中的屏蔽与放松:奖励预期抵消了多任务处理中任务屏蔽的放松。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:112-123. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
The volatile nature of positive affect effects: opposite effects of positive affect and time on task on proactive control.积极情绪效应的易变本质:积极情绪与任务时间对主动控制的相反影响。
Psychol Res. 2020 Apr;84(3):774-783. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1086-4. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
The dynamic balance between cognitive flexibility and stability: the influence of local changes in reward expectation and global task context on voluntary switch rate.认知灵活性与稳定性之间的动态平衡:奖励期望的局部变化和全局任务背景对自愿转换率的影响。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):65-77. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0922-2. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.提示认知灵活性:特定项目的转换准备学习。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Dec;43(12):1950-1960. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000420. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
How performance-contingent reward prospect modulates cognitive control: Increased cue maintenance at the cost of decreased flexibility.绩效 contingent 奖励预期如何调节认知控制:以灵活性降低为代价增加线索维持。 (注:这里“contingent”常见释义为“依情况而定的” ,但在这个语境中可能是特定术语,可根据具体医学专业背景进一步准确理解和调整表述 )
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(10):1643-1658. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000397. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
8
Keep flexible - Keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.保持灵活性——不断切换!强制任务切换对自愿任务切换的影响。
Cognition. 2017 May;162:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
9
The costs and benefits of brain dopamine for cognitive control.大脑多巴胺对认知控制的成本与收益。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;7(5):317-29. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1401. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
10
How performance (non-)contingent reward modulates cognitive control.绩效(非)偶然奖励如何调节认知控制。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jul;168:65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 6.