• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体支持修复体制作材料上生物膜形成的比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant-Supported Prostheses.

作者信息

Sadid-Zadeh Ramtin, Willis Jeffrey, Forgo Gyula, Haraszthy Violet

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Department of Prosthodontics, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, NY,USA.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2020 Sep 4;31(4):380-384. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202003385.

DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202003385
PMID:32901713
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare biofilm formation on materials used for the fabrication of implant-supported dental prostheses. Twenty discs (D=15 mm, H=3 mm) were fabricated from one of the following restorative materials: yttria tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP); commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti); or heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Specimens were polished following standard protocols. A non-contact profilometer (NPFLEX, Bruker, UK) was used to assess the surface roughness of each disk; results were reported as Ra (µm). Five strains of Gram-negative bacteria frequently associated with peri-implantitis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Candida. albicans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Tannerella forsythia, were cultured on hand-polished discs fabricated from heat-cured PMMA, Y-TZP, or CP-Ti to compare biofilm formation on each type of material. The results were reported as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). One-way ANOVA and post hoc tests were used to compare surface roughness and bacterial colonization on the respective materials. Statistical significance was set at a = 0.05. Discs fabricated from Y-TZP had a significantly higher Ra value (350 ± 30 µm) than either PMMA, or CP-Ti discs. Discs fabricated from either Y-TZP and CP-Ti may exhibit less colonization by bacteria associated with peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis. Y-TZP and CP-Ti are suggested materials for fabrication of implant-supported prostheses, considering biofilm formation.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较用于制作种植体支持式假牙的材料上生物膜的形成情况。用以下修复材料之一制作了20个圆盘(直径15毫米,高3毫米):钇稳定四方多晶氧化锆(Y-TZP);商业纯钛(CP-Ti);或热固化聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)。按照标准方案对样本进行抛光。使用非接触式轮廓仪(NPFLEX,布鲁克,英国)评估每个圆盘的表面粗糙度;结果以Ra(微米)表示。将5种经常与种植体周围炎相关的革兰氏阴性菌,即伴放线聚集杆菌、白色念珠菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和福赛坦纳菌,在由热固化PMMA、Y-TZP或CP-Ti制成的手工抛光圆盘上培养,以比较每种材料上生物膜的形成情况。结果以每毫升菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)表示。使用单因素方差分析和事后检验来比较各材料的表面粗糙度和细菌定植情况。统计学显著性设定为α = 0.05。由Y-TZP制成的圆盘的Ra值(350±30微米)显著高于PMMA或CP-Ti圆盘。由Y-TZP和CP-Ti制成的圆盘可能表现出较少的与牙周炎和种植体周围炎相关细菌的定植。考虑到生物膜的形成,Y-TZP和CP-Ti被建议作为制作种植体支持式假牙的材料。

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant-Supported Prostheses.种植体支持修复体制作材料上生物膜形成的比较分析
Braz Dent J. 2020 Sep 4;31(4):380-384. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202003385.
2
Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses.用于制作种植体支持修复体的材料上生物膜形成的比较分析。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S812-S815. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_7_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
3
Evaluation of Temperature and Roughness Alteration of Diode Laser Irradiation of Zirconia and Titanium for Peri-Implantitis Treatment.用于种植体周围炎治疗的二极管激光照射氧化锆和钛的温度及粗糙度变化评估
Photomed Laser Surg. 2016 May;34(5):194-9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.4026. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
In vitro adherence of periodontopathic bacteria to zirconia and titanium surfaces.体外黏附于氧化锆和钛表面的牙周病致病菌。
Dent Mater J. 2013;32(1):101-6. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-156.
5
Effect of implant cleaning on titanium particle dissolution and cytocompatibility.种植体清洗对钛颗粒溶解和细胞相容性的影响。
J Periodontol. 2021 Apr;92(4):580-591. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0186. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
6
An assessment of early colonisation of implant-abutment metal surfaces by single species and co-cultured bacterial periodontal pathogens.种植体-基台金属表面单一种属和共培养牙周致病菌早期定植的评估。
J Dent. 2016 Oct;53:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
7
Peri-Implant Microbial Signature Shifts in Titanium, Zirconia and Ceria-Stabilized Zirconia Reinforced with Alumina Sites Subjected to Experimental Peri-Implantitis: A Preclinical Study in Dogs.钛、氧化锆以及氧化铝增强二氧化铈稳定氧化锆种植体周围微生物特征变化与实验性种植体周炎的关系:犬类临床前研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;13(8):690. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080690.
8
The Efficacy of an Anatase-Coated Collar Surface in Inhibiting the Bacterial Colonization of Oral Implants: A Pilot Prospective Study in Humans.锐钛矿涂层种植体表面抑制口腔种植体细菌定植的疗效:一项人类前瞻性初步研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Mar/Apr;33(2):395-404. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5880.
9
Comparison of Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implants.钛和氧化锆种植体上生物膜形成的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2023 Apr 15;2023:8728499. doi: 10.1155/2023/8728499. eCollection 2023.
10
Experimental models for contamination of titanium surfaces and disinfection protocols.钛表面污染的实验模型及消毒方案
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Oct;27(10):1233-1242. doi: 10.1111/clr.12735. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomaterials and Clinical Application of Dental Implants in Relation to Bone Density-A Narrative Review.与骨密度相关的牙种植体生物材料及临床应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 3;12(21):6924. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216924.
2
In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Zirconia Implant Surfaces Treated with Femtosecond and Nanosecond Lasers.飞秒激光和纳秒激光处理的氧化锆种植体表面的体外生物膜形成
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Sep 22;14(10):486. doi: 10.3390/jfb14100486.
3
Influence of Dental Titanium Implants with Different Surface Treatments Using Femtosecond and Nanosecond Lasers on Biofilm Formation.
飞秒和纳秒激光不同表面处理的牙科钛种植体对生物膜形成的影响
J Funct Biomater. 2023 May 26;14(6):297. doi: 10.3390/jfb14060297.
4
The Main Bacterial Communities Identified in the Sites Affected by Periimplantitis: A Systematic Review.种植体周炎影响部位中鉴定出的主要细菌群落:一项系统综述。
Microorganisms. 2022 Jun 16;10(6):1232. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061232.