• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒和纳秒激光不同表面处理的牙科钛种植体对生物膜形成的影响

Influence of Dental Titanium Implants with Different Surface Treatments Using Femtosecond and Nanosecond Lasers on Biofilm Formation.

作者信息

Seo Bo Yun, Son KeunBaDa, Son Young-Tak, Dahal Ram Hari, Kim Shukho, Kim Jungmin, Hwang JunHo, Kwon Sung-Min, Lee Jae-Mok, Lee Kyu-Bok, Kim Jin-Wook

机构信息

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Republic of Korea.

Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Funct Biomater. 2023 May 26;14(6):297. doi: 10.3390/jfb14060297.

DOI:10.3390/jfb14060297
PMID:37367261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10299422/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different surface treatments (machined; sandblasted, large grit, and acid-etched (SLA); hydrophilic; and hydrophobic) on dental titanium (Ti) implant surface morphology, roughness, and biofilm formation. Four groups of Ti disks were prepared using distinct surface treatments, including femtosecond and nanosecond lasers for hydrophilic and hydrophobic treatments. Surface morphology, wettability, and roughness were assessed. Biofilm formation was evaluated by counting the colonies of (Aa), (Pg), and (Pi) at 48 and 72 h. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the groups using the Kruskal-Wallis H test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α = 0.05). The analysis revealed that the hydrophobic group had the highest surface contact angle and roughness ( < 0.05), whereas the machined group had significantly higher bacterial counts across all biofilms ( < 0.05). At 48 h, the lowest bacterial counts were observed in the SLA group for Aa and the SLA and hydrophobic groups for Pg and Pi. At 72 h, low bacterial counts were observed in the SLA, hydrophilic, and hydrophobic groups. The results indicate that various surface treatments affect implant surface properties, with the hydrophobic surface using femtosecond laser treatment exerting a particularly inhibitory effect on initial biofilm growth (Pg and Pi).

摘要

本研究旨在评估不同表面处理(机械加工;喷砂、大颗粒及酸蚀(SLA);亲水;疏水)对牙科钛(Ti)种植体表面形态、粗糙度和生物膜形成的影响。使用不同的表面处理制备了四组钛盘,包括用于亲水和疏水表面处理的飞秒激光和纳秒激光。评估了表面形态、润湿性和粗糙度。通过在48小时和72小时时计数牙龈卟啉单胞菌(Pg)、伴放线聚集杆菌(Aa)和具核梭杆菌(Pi)的菌落来评估生物膜形成。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验(α = 0.05)进行统计分析以比较各组。分析显示,疏水组具有最高的表面接触角和粗糙度(P < 0.05),而机械加工组在所有生物膜中的细菌计数均显著更高(P < 0.05)。在48小时时,Aa在SLA组中的细菌计数最低,Pg和Pi在SLA组和疏水组中的细菌计数最低。在72小时时,SLA组、亲水组和疏水组中的细菌计数较低。结果表明,各种表面处理会影响种植体表面特性,飞秒激光处理的疏水表面对初始生物膜生长(Pg和Pi)具有特别的抑制作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/25a84b4d9415/jfb-14-00297-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/b60b0e359b46/jfb-14-00297-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/7ddebc345832/jfb-14-00297-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/cbbeec4bcc07/jfb-14-00297-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/2566a04d6540/jfb-14-00297-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/25a84b4d9415/jfb-14-00297-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/b60b0e359b46/jfb-14-00297-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/7ddebc345832/jfb-14-00297-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/cbbeec4bcc07/jfb-14-00297-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/2566a04d6540/jfb-14-00297-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d9/10299422/25a84b4d9415/jfb-14-00297-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of Dental Titanium Implants with Different Surface Treatments Using Femtosecond and Nanosecond Lasers on Biofilm Formation.飞秒和纳秒激光不同表面处理的牙科钛种植体对生物膜形成的影响
J Funct Biomater. 2023 May 26;14(6):297. doi: 10.3390/jfb14060297.
2
In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Zirconia Implant Surfaces Treated with Femtosecond and Nanosecond Lasers.飞秒激光和纳秒激光处理的氧化锆种植体表面的体外生物膜形成
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Sep 22;14(10):486. doi: 10.3390/jfb14100486.
3
The Impact of Mechanical Debridement Techniques on Titanium Implant Surfaces: A Comparison of Sandblasted, Acid-Etched, and Femtosecond Laser-Treated Surfaces.机械清创技术对钛种植体表面的影响:喷砂、酸蚀和飞秒激光处理表面的比较
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Oct 9;14(10):502. doi: 10.3390/jfb14100502.
4
Erbium, Chromium:Yttrium-Scandium-Gallium-Garnet Laser Effectively Ablates Single-Species Biofilms on Titanium Disks Without Detectable Surface Damage.掺铒、铬:钇-钪-镓-石榴石激光有效去除钛盘上的单种生物膜,而不会造成可检测的表面损伤。
J Periodontol. 2017 May;88(5):484-492. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160529. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
5
Er,Cr:YSGG laser surface treatment of gamma titanium aluminide: Scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer analysis, wettability and and bacteria count-in vitro study.钇稳定氧化锆(Er,Cr:YSGG)激光表面处理钛铝金属间化合物:扫描电子显微镜-能谱仪分析、润湿性和体外细菌计数研究。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2020 Aug;234(8):769-783. doi: 10.1177/0954411920924517. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
Influence of topography and hydrophilicity on initial oral biofilm formation on microstructured titanium surfaces in vitro.体外研究形貌和润湿性对微结构钛表面初始口腔生物膜形成的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Mar;23(3):301-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02184.x. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
7
Formation of biofilm on various implant abutment materials.生物膜在各种种植体基台材料上的形成。
Gen Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;66(5):39-44.
8
Effect of Electrocautery and Laser Treatment on the Composition and Morphology of Surface-Modified Titanium Implants.电灼术和激光治疗对表面改性钛植入物的成分和形态的影响。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;10(11):1251. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10111251.
9
Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm formation in different titanium surfaces, an in vitro study.牙龈卟啉单胞菌在不同钛表面的生物膜形成:一项体外研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jul;27(7):918-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12659. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Evaluation of the effect of diode laser application on the hydrophilicity, surface topography, and chemical composition of titanium dental implant surface.评估二极管激光应用对牙科钛种植体表面亲水性、表面形貌和化学成分的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Apr;34(4):395-402. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13823. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Anti-Inflammatory and Osteogenic Effect of Phloroglucinol-Enriched Whey Protein Isolate Fibrillar Coating on Ti-6Al-4V Alloy.富含间苯三酚的乳清蛋白分离物纤维涂层对Ti-6Al-4V合金的抗炎和成骨作用
Polymers (Basel). 2025 May 29;17(11):1514. doi: 10.3390/polym17111514.
2
Effects of dental implant surface treated with sandblasting large grit acid-etching and femtosecond laser on implant stability, marginal bone volume, and histological results in a rabbit model.大颗粒喷砂酸蚀和飞秒激光处理的牙种植体表面对兔模型种植体稳定性、边缘骨量及组织学结果的影响
J Adv Prosthodont. 2025 Apr;17(2):101-114. doi: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.2.101. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implants.钛和氧化锆种植体上生物膜形成的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2023 Apr 15;2023:8728499. doi: 10.1155/2023/8728499. eCollection 2023.
2
Advanced surface engineering of titanium materials for biomedical applications: From static modification to dynamic responsive regulation.用于生物医学应用的钛材料的先进表面工程:从静态改性到动态响应调控
Bioact Mater. 2023 Mar 27;27:15-57. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.03.006. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Preventing Peri-implantitis: The Quest for a Next Generation of Titanium Dental Implants.
Effect of nanosecond laser assisted surface modification on physical and mechanical properties of denture base materials.
纳秒激光辅助表面改性对义齿基托材料物理和力学性能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 29;15(1):10879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94757-w.
4
The Impact of Mechanical Debridement Techniques on Titanium Implant Surfaces: A Comparison of Sandblasted, Acid-Etched, and Femtosecond Laser-Treated Surfaces.机械清创技术对钛种植体表面的影响:喷砂、酸蚀和飞秒激光处理表面的比较
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Oct 9;14(10):502. doi: 10.3390/jfb14100502.
5
In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Zirconia Implant Surfaces Treated with Femtosecond and Nanosecond Lasers.飞秒激光和纳秒激光处理的氧化锆种植体表面的体外生物膜形成
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Sep 22;14(10):486. doi: 10.3390/jfb14100486.
6
The Effects of a Biomimetic Hybrid Meso- and Nano-Scale Surface Topography on Blood and Protein Recruitment in a Computational Fluid Dynamics Implant Model.仿生中尺度和纳米尺度表面形貌对计算流体动力学植入模型中血液和蛋白质募集的影响
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;8(4):376. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8040376.
预防种植体周围炎:新一代钛牙科种植体的探索。
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022 Nov 14;8(11):4697-4737. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00540. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
4
Surface Engineering for Dental Implantology: Favoring Tissue Responses Along the Implant.口腔种植学中的表面工程:有利于种植体周围组织的反应。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2022 Jun;28(11-12):555-572. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2021.0230.
5
Influence of different zirconia surface treatments on biofilm formation in vitro and in situ.不同氧化锆表面处理方法对体外和体内生物膜形成的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Apr;33(4):424-432. doi: 10.1111/clr.13902. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
6
Prosthetic failures in dental implant therapy.牙科种植体治疗中的修复体失败。
Periodontol 2000. 2022 Feb;88(1):130-144. doi: 10.1111/prd.12416.
7
Intranuclear cell uptake and toxicity of titanium dioxide and zirconia particles as well as bacterial adhesion on dental titanium- and zirconia-implants.二氧化钛和氧化锆颗粒的核内细胞摄取及毒性以及细菌在牙科钛和锆植入物上的黏附
Dent Mater. 2022 Mar;38(3):517-528. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.142. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
8
Succession of oral bacterial colonizers on dental implant materials: An in vitro biofilm model.口腔定植细菌在牙种植材料表面的演替:一种体外生物膜模型。
Dent Mater. 2022 Feb;38(2):384-396. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.021. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
9
Innovative surfaces and alloys for dental implants: What about biointerface-safety concerns?用于牙科植入物的创新表面和合金:生物界面安全问题如何?
Dent Mater. 2021 Oct;37(10):1447-1462. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
10
Comparison of the Stability of Sandblasted, Large-Grit, and Acid-Etched Treated Mini-Screws With Two Different Surface Roughness Values: A Histomorphometric Study.喷砂大颗粒酸蚀处理微型螺钉与两种不同表面粗糙度值的稳定性比较:一项组织形态计量学研究。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(1):41-47. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007837.