Lymeus Freddie, Ahrling Marie, Apelman Josef, Florin Cecilia de Mander, Nilsson Cecilia, Vincenti Janina, Zetterberg Agnes, Lindberg Per, Hartig Terry
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 12;11:1560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01560. eCollection 2020.
Restoration skills training (ReST) is a mindfulness-based course that draws on restorative nature experience to facilitate the meditation practice and teach widely applicable adaptation skills. Previous studies comparing ReST to conventional mindfulness training (CMT) showed that ReST has important advantages: it supports beginning meditators in connecting with restorative environmental qualities and in meditating with less effort; it restores their attention regulation capabilities; and it helps them complete the course and establish a regular meditation habit. However, mindfulness theory indicates that effortful training may be necessary to achieve generalized improvements in psychological functioning. Therefore, this study tests whether the less effortful and more acceptable ReST approach is attended by any meaningful disadvantage compared to CMT in terms of its effects on central aspects psychological functioning. We analyze data from four rounds of development of the ReST course, in each of which we compared it to a parallel and formally matched CMT course. Randomly assigned participants (total course starters = 152) provided ratings of dispositional mindfulness, cognitive functioning, and chronic stress before and after the 5-week ReST and CMT courses. Round 4 also included a separately recruited passive control condition. ReST and CMT were attended by similar average improvements in the three outcomes, although the effects on chronic stress were inconsistent. Moderate to large improvements in the three outcomes could also be affirmed in contrasts with the passive controls. Using a reliable change index, we saw that over one third of the ReST and CMT participants enjoyed reliably improved psychological functioning. The risk of experiencing deteriorated functioning was no greater with either ReST or CMT than for passive control group participants. None of the contrasts exceeded our stringent criterion for inferiority of ReST compared with CMT. We conclude that ReST is a promising alternative for otherwise healthy people with stress or concentration problems who would be less likely to complete more effortful CMT. By adapting the meditation practices to draw on restorative setting characteristics, ReST can mitigate the demands otherwise incurred in early stages of mindfulness training without compromising the acquisition of widely applicable mindfulness skills.
恢复技能训练(ReST)是一门基于正念的课程,它借鉴恢复性自然体验来促进冥想练习并教授广泛适用的适应技能。先前将ReST与传统正念训练(CMT)进行比较的研究表明,ReST具有重要优势:它帮助初学者与恢复性环境特质建立联系,并以更少的努力进行冥想;它恢复他们的注意力调节能力;并且它帮助他们完成课程并建立定期冥想习惯。然而,正念理论表明,可能需要进行有难度的训练才能在心理功能上实现普遍改善。因此,本研究测试了与CMT相比,这种更轻松且更易接受的ReST方法在对心理功能核心方面的影响上是否存在任何有意义的劣势。我们分析了ReST课程四轮开发的数据,在每一轮中我们都将其与一个平行且形式匹配的CMT课程进行比较。随机分配的参与者(课程总起始人数 = 152)在为期5周的ReST和CMT课程前后提供了关于特质正念、认知功能和慢性压力的评分。第4轮还包括一个单独招募的被动对照组。ReST和CMT在这三个结果上的平均改善情况相似,尽管对慢性压力的影响并不一致。与被动对照组相比,这三个结果也有中度到较大程度的改善。使用可靠变化指数,我们发现超过三分之一的ReST和CMT参与者的心理功能得到了可靠改善。ReST或CMT组出现功能恶化的风险并不比被动对照组参与者更高。与CMT相比,没有任何对比超过我们设定的ReST劣势的严格标准。我们得出结论,对于有压力或注意力问题的健康人群来说,ReST是一个有前景的替代选择,这些人不太可能完成更有难度的CMT。通过调整冥想练习以利用恢复性环境特征,ReST可以减轻正念训练早期阶段原本会产生的要求,而不会影响广泛适用的正念技能的习得。