Tollenaar Marieke S, Overgaauw Sandy
Department of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, the Netherlands.
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 14;6(8):e04488. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04488. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Stress has many consequences for our wellbeing, both physically and psychologically, underscoring the need to study markers of differential sensitivity to stressful situations. We examined associations between empathy and mentalizing abilities and psycho-physiological responses to a psychosocial stress task. We conducted two highly comparable studies, the first in men (N = 52) and the second in women (N = 72). Each study started with a self-report empathy measure and a mentalizing test [Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)] followed by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) or a control task. Stress reactivity was confirmed in both men and women with significantly higher levels of cortisol, blood pressure, and subjective stress levels in response to the TSST compared to the control task. Higher accuracy on the RMET significantly predicted higher cortisol and heart rate reactivity, while self-reported empathic concern significantly predicted higher subjective stress reactivity. These associations were found in men, and when men and women were analyzed together. This indicates that higher levels of mentalizing and empathic abilities may confer sensitivity to socially stressful situations. While a moderation analysis indicated no gender differences in these associations, the findings could not be directly replicated in women. This suggests that gender may impact such associations and that replication of the findings in larger samples is warranted.
压力对我们的身心健康有诸多影响,这凸显了研究对压力情境差异敏感性指标的必要性。我们研究了共情与心理化能力以及对心理社会应激任务的心理生理反应之间的关联。我们进行了两项高度可比的研究,第一项针对男性(N = 52),第二项针对女性(N = 72)。每项研究均始于一项自我报告的共情测量和一项心理化测试[眼睛解读心智测试(RMET)],随后进行特里尔社会应激测试(TSST)或一项对照任务。与对照任务相比,TSST引发的皮质醇、血压和主观压力水平显著升高,证实了男性和女性的应激反应性。RMET的更高准确率显著预测了更高的皮质醇和心率反应性,而自我报告的共情关注显著预测了更高的主观应激反应性。这些关联在男性中以及在对男性和女性进行综合分析时均被发现。这表明更高水平的心理化和共情能力可能使人对社会压力情境敏感。虽然一项调节分析表明这些关联不存在性别差异,但这些发现无法在女性中直接重复验证。这表明性别可能影响此类关联,有必要在更大样本中重复验证这些发现。