• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can Clinical Predictive Models Identify Patients Who Should Not Receive TAVR? A Systematic Review.临床预测模型能否识别出不适合接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者?一项系统评价。
Struct Heart. 2020;4(4):295-299. doi: 10.1080/24748706.2020.1782549. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后住院死亡率风险预测模型的建立与验证。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;1(1):46-52. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0326.
3
Comorbidity Burden and Adverse Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的合并症负担和不良结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 18;10(10):e018978. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018978. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
Safety and efficacy of a self-expanding versus a balloon-expandable bioprosthesis for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a randomised non-inferiority trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中自膨式与球囊扩张式生物瓣治疗有症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的安全性和疗效:一项随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1619-1628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32220-2. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
5
Health status after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients at extreme surgical risk: results from the CoreValve U.S. trial.手术风险极高的患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的健康状况:美国CoreValve试验结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb;8(2):315-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.08.016.
6
Incidence, Management, and Associated Clinical Outcomes of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Analysis From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发心房颤动的发生率、处理方法及相关临床结局:STS/ACC TVT 注册研究分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 10;11(17):1746-1756. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.042.
7
Futility, benefit, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.无益、获益和经导管主动脉瓣置换术。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jul;7(7):707-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.167. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
8
How to define a poor outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: conceptual framework and empirical observations from the placement of aortic transcatheter valve (PARTNER) trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后如何定义不良结局:来自主动脉经导管瓣膜置入(PARTNER)试验的概念框架与实证观察
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):591-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000354. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
9
Outcomes in the Randomized CoreValve US Pivotal High Risk Trial in Patients With a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score of 7% or Less.随机 CoreValve US 关键高危试验中 Society of Thoracic Surgeons 风险评分低于 7%的患者的结局。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;1(8):945-949. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2257.
10
Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结果。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2069-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282043.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing the Contemporary Multidisciplinary Heart Valve Team: Update on Priorities for Clinicians and Programs.推进当代多学科心脏瓣膜团队建设:临床医生和项目优先事项的最新进展
Struct Heart. 2025 May 12;9(7):100490. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100490. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Evolving perspectives on aortic stenosis: the increasing importance of evaluating the right ventricle before aortic valve intervention.主动脉瓣狭窄的演变观点:在主动脉瓣介入治疗前评估右心室的重要性日益增加。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 8;11:1506993. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1506993. eCollection 2024.
3
Identifying Predictors of Psychological Problems Among Adolescents With Congenital Heart Disease for Referral to Psychological Care: A Pilot Study.识别先天性心脏病青少年心理问题的预测因素以便转介至心理护理:一项试点研究。
CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis. 2022 Dec 12;2(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cjcpc.2022.12.001. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Left ventricular stroke volume index following transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an early predictor of 1-year survival.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后左心室每搏量指数是 1 年生存率的早期预测指标。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Jan;46(1):76-83. doi: 10.1002/clc.23937. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
5
The Prognosis of Baseline Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者基线二尖瓣反流的预后
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 2;10(17):3974. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173974.

本文引用的文献

1
The Learning Curve for Shared Decision-making in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis.症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的共享决策学习曲线。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):442-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5719.
2
Clinical Prediction Models for Valvular Heart Disease.临床瓣膜性心脏病预测模型。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct 15;8(20):e011972. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.011972. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗终末期肾病患者。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 11;73(22):2806-2815. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.496.
4
Tufts PACE Clinical Predictive Model Registry: update 1990 through 2015.塔夫茨PACE临床预测模型注册库:1990年至2015年更新
Diagn Progn Res. 2017 Dec 21;1:20. doi: 10.1186/s41512-017-0021-2. eCollection 2017.
5
2018 AATS/ACC/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document: Operator and Institutional Recommendations and Requirements for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Joint Report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2018年美国胸外科医师协会/美国心脏病学会/心血管造影和介入学会/胸外科医师学会专家共识护理系统文件:经导管主动脉瓣置换术的术者及机构建议与要求:美国胸外科协会、美国心脏病学会、心血管造影和介入学会及胸外科医师学会联合报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jan 29;73(3):340-374. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
6
Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Prognostic Impact After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients Undergoing TAVR.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的肺动脉高压:经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的预后影响:行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者的肺动脉高压。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;12(4):591-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
7
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The TOPAS-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:TOPAS-TAVI 注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 27;71(12):1297-1308. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.054.
8
Novel United Kingdom prognostic model for 30-day mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后 30 天死亡率的新型英国预后模型。
Heart. 2018 Jul;104(13):1109-1116. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312489. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
9
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Futility Risk Model Development and Validation Among Treated Patients With Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术在主动脉瓣狭窄治疗患者中的无效风险模型的开发与验证
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15;120(12):2241-2246. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
10
Assessment of Commonly Used Frailty Markers for High- and Extreme-Risk Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术高危和极高危患者常用衰弱标志物的评估
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Dec;104(6):1939-1946. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.067. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

临床预测模型能否识别出不适合接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者?一项系统评价。

Can Clinical Predictive Models Identify Patients Who Should Not Receive TAVR? A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Wessler Benjamin S, Weintraub Andrew R, Udelson James E, Kent David M

机构信息

Division of Cardiology and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center.

Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Tufts Medical Center.

出版信息

Struct Heart. 2020;4(4):295-299. doi: 10.1080/24748706.2020.1782549. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1080/24748706.2020.1782549
PMID:32905421
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7469888/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One third of high- and prohibitive-risk TAVR patients remain severely symptomatic or die 1 year after treatment. There is interest in identifying individuals for whom this procedure is futile and should not be offered.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the highest reported stratum of risk in TAVR clinical predictive models (CPMs). We explore whether currently available predictive models can identify patients for whom TAVR is futile, based on a quantitative futility definition and the observed and predicted outcomes for patients in the highest stratum of risk.

RESULTS

17 TAVR CPMs representing 69,191 treated patients were published from 2013 to 2018. When reported, the median number of patients in the highest stratum of risk was 569 (range 1 to 1759). Observed mortality for this risk stratum ranged from 9% at 30 days to 59% at 1 year after TAVR. Statistical confidence in these observed event rates was low. The highest predicted event rates ranged from 11.0% for in-hospital mortality to 75.1% for the composite of mortality or high symptom burden 1 year after TAVR.

CONCLUSION

No high-risk TAVR group in currently available TAVR CPMs had an appropriate event rate and adequate statistical power to meet a quantitative definition of futility.

摘要

背景

三分之一的高风险和极高风险经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者在治疗后1年仍有严重症状或死亡。确定哪些患者进行该手术是徒劳的且不应接受该手术是人们所关注的。

方法

我们对TAVR临床预测模型(CPM)中报告的最高风险分层进行了系统评价。我们基于定量的无效性定义以及最高风险分层患者的观察和预测结果,探讨目前可用的预测模型是否能够识别出TAVR手术徒劳的患者。

结果

2013年至2018年发表了17个代表69191例接受治疗患者的TAVR CPM。报告时,最高风险分层的患者中位数为569例(范围1至1759例)。该风险分层的观察到的死亡率在TAVR术后30天为9%,1年时为59%。对这些观察到的事件发生率的统计置信度较低。最高预测事件发生率在TAVR术后住院死亡率为11.0%,1年时死亡或高症状负担的复合发生率为75.1%。

结论

目前可用的TAVR CPM中没有高风险TAVR组具有合适的事件发生率和足够的统计效力来满足无效性的定量定义。