Pichon Maxime, Valette Martine, Schuffenecker Isabelle, Billaud Geneviève, Lina Bruno
Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, CHU Poitiers, Département des Agents Infectieux, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Laboratoire de Virologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Centre National de Référence des virus des infections respiratoires (dont la Grippe), Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, CEDEX 04, 69317 Lyon, France.
Microorganisms. 2020 Sep 7;8(9):1371. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091371.
Respiratory infection are mainly caused by viral pathogens. During the 2017-2018 epidemic season, Panther Fusion Respiratory kits (Influenza virus A&B (FluA&B), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus (ADV), metapneumovirus (MPV), rhinovirus (RV), parainfluenzae virus (PIV), were compared to the Respiratory MultiWells System r-gene. Respiratory clinical specimens were tested retrospectively ( = 268) and prospectively ( = 463). Analytical performances were determined (sensitivity -Sep-, specificity -Spe- and κ) considering concordances of ≥2 molecular testing specific to each viral target (discrepant results were verified at the National Reference Centres for Enteroviruses or Respiratory viruses, Lyon, France). After retrospective (and prospective) testing, Sep, Spe, and κ were 100% (97.7%), 100% (99%) and 100% (94%) for FluA: 100% (95.5%), 100% (99.3%) and 100% (94%) for FluB, and 100% (88.5%), 100% (98.7%) and 100% (89%) for RSV; 82.1% (41.7%), 100% (99.5%) and 86% (54%) for ADV; 94.7% (73.7%), 96.1% (98.0%) and 91% (65%) for MPV; 96.1% (94.6%), 90.2% (98.5%) and 86% (91%) for HRV; and 90% (72.7%), 100% (99.3%) and 91% (72%), respectively, for PIV. Analytical performances were above 85% for all viruses except for ADV, MPV and PIV, confirming the analytical performance of the Panther Fusion system, a high throughput system with reduced turn-around-time, when compared to non-automated systems.
呼吸道感染主要由病毒病原体引起。在2017 - 2018流行季节,将Panther Fusion呼吸道检测试剂盒(甲型和乙型流感病毒(FluA&B)、呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)、腺病毒(ADV)、偏肺病毒(MPV)、鼻病毒(RV)、副流感病毒(PIV))与Respiratory MultiWells System r-gene进行了比较。对呼吸道临床标本进行了回顾性检测(n = 268)和前瞻性检测(n = 463)。考虑到针对每个病毒靶点的≥2种分子检测的一致性来确定分析性能(敏感性 -Sep-、特异性 -Spe- 和κ)(不一致的结果在法国里昂的肠道病毒或呼吸道病毒国家参考中心进行了验证)。经过回顾性(和前瞻性)检测后,FluA的Sep、Spe和κ分别为100%(97.7%)、100%(99%)和100%(94%);FluB的分别为100%(95.5%)、100%(99.3%)和100%(94%);RSV的分别为100%(88.5%)、100%(98.7%)和100%(89%);ADV的分别为82.1%(41.7%)、100%(99.5%)和86%(54%);MPV的分别为94.7%(73.7%)、96.1%(98.0%)和91%(65%);HRV的分别为96.1%(94.6%)、90.2%(98.5%)和86%(91%);PIV的分别为90%(72.7%)、100%(99.3%)和91%(72%)。除ADV、MPV和PIV外,所有病毒的分析性能均高于85%,这证实了Panther Fusion系统的分析性能,该系统是一个周转时间缩短的高通量系统,与非自动化系统相比。