Neurosciences Building, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Dec;237(12):3773-3782. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05654-1. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
Lithium is an effective prophylactic and anti-manic treatment in bipolar disorder; however, its use is declining through perceived poor tolerance and toxicity. Lithium inhibits inositol monophosphatase (IMPase), a probable key therapeutic mechanism. The anti-inflammatory drug, ebselen, also inhibits IMPase and appears well-tolerated and safe.
To assess the efficacy of adjunctive ebselen in mania using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) (primary outcome) and the Altman Self-Rating Mania (ASRM) Scale and Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) among the secondary outcomes.
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted between October 2017 and June 2019, at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust. Pharmacy-controlled randomisation was computer-generated, with full allocation concealment. In/outpatients (n = 68) aged 18-70, experiencing mania or hypomania, were assigned to 3 weeks ebselen (600 mg bd) (n = 33) or placebo (n = 35). Participants received usual clinical care and psychotropic medication.
Ebselen was numerically, but not statistically, superior to placebo in lowering scores on the YMRS (adjusted mean difference and 95% confidence interval, - 1.71 (- 5.34 to 1.91), p = 0.35) and ASRM (- 1.36 (- 3.75 to 1.17), p = 0.29). However, scores on the CGI-S were significantly lower at week 3 in ebselen-treated participants (adjusted mean difference, - 0.58 (- 1.14 to - 0.03), p = 0.04). A post hoc analysis excluding patients taking concomitant valproate treatment magnified the difference between ebselen and placebo on the YMRS. Adverse events were comparable between groups, and mild.
Ebselen merits further investigation where concomitant psychotropic medication is better controlled and participants taking valproate are excluded. If effective, ebselen's superior tolerance and safety could make it a useful alternative to lithium.
Trial Registry: www.clinicaltrials.gov , Identifier: NCT03013400.
锂是双相情感障碍的有效预防和抗躁狂治疗药物;然而,由于被认为耐受性差和毒性大,其使用正在减少。锂抑制肌醇单磷酸酶(IMPase),这可能是一种主要的治疗机制。抗炎药物依布硒啉也抑制 IMPase,且耐受性良好,安全性高。
使用 Young 躁狂评定量表(YMRS)(主要结局)和 Altman 自评躁狂量表(ASRM)和临床总体印象严重程度量表(CGI-S)评估辅助依布硒啉治疗躁狂的疗效。
这是一项于 2017 年 10 月至 2019 年 6 月在牛津健康 NHS 基金会信托基金进行的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验。药房控制的随机化由计算机生成,完全隐藏了分配。纳入年龄在 18-70 岁之间、经历躁狂或轻躁狂的门诊或住院患者(n=68),分为 3 周依布硒啉(600mg,每日 2 次)(n=33)或安慰剂(n=35)组。参与者接受常规临床护理和精神药物治疗。
与安慰剂相比,依布硒啉在降低 YMRS(调整后的平均差异和 95%置信区间,-1.71[-5.34 至 1.91],p=0.35)和 ASRM(-1.36[-3.75 至 1.17],p=0.29)评分方面具有优势,但无统计学意义。然而,在依布硒啉治疗的参与者中,在第 3 周时 CGI-S 评分显著降低(调整后的平均差异,-0.58[-1.14 至 -0.03],p=0.04)。对排除同时服用丙戊酸钠治疗的患者进行的事后分析,放大了依布硒啉和安慰剂在 YMRS 上的差异。两组间不良反应相似,且均为轻度。
在更好地控制同时服用的精神药物且排除服用丙戊酸钠的患者中,依布硒啉值得进一步研究。如果有效,依布硒啉的耐受性和安全性更好,可能成为锂的有用替代品。