Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Sunto-Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan.
World J Surg. 2021 Jan;45(1):270-278. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05770-1. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) has been regarded as one of the prognostic factors in patients with ampulla of Vater carcinoma (AC). However, the consensus about an optimal cutoff value of the number of LNMs and the definition of the regional lymph nodes (RLNs) has not been achieved.
This study included 114 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for AC between January 2002 and March 2019.
The minimum p value approach for the greatest difference in the overall survival classified the number of LNM into none (N0, n = 66), from 1 to 2 (N1, n = 32), and ≥3 LNM (N2, n = 11) (p = 0.004). Distant LNM was defined as M1 (n = 5). Significant differences in relapse-free survival (RFS) were found between N0 and N1 (p < 0.001), N1 and N2 (p = 0.047), and N1 and M1 (p = 0.044) but not between N2 and M1 (p = 0.683). Moreover, the patients with regional LNM were classified into two groups: Np group (n = 35, LNM only in pancreatic head region) and Nd group (n = 8, LNM in other regional location). Significant differences in the RFS were found between N0 and Np (p < 0.001), Np and Nd (p = 0.004), and Np and M1 (p = 0.033) but not between Nd and M1 (p = 0.883). A Cox proportional hazards analysis for RFS revealed that ≥ 3 LNMs (hazards ratio [HR], 3.22) and LNM except for pancreatic head region (HR, 4.27) were individually independent worse prognostic factors.
≥3 LNMs and regional LNM except for pancreatic head region were associated with poor prognosis comparable to that of the patients with M1.
淋巴结转移(LNM)已被视为壶腹癌(AC)患者的预后因素之一。然而,关于 LNM 数量的最佳截断值和区域淋巴结(RLN)的定义尚未达成共识。
本研究纳入了 2002 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月期间接受胰十二指肠切除术治疗的 114 例 AC 连续患者。
基于总体生存差异最大的最小 p 值法,将 LNM 数量分为无(N0,n=66)、1-2 个(N1,n=32)和≥3 个(N2,n=11)(p=0.004)。远处淋巴结转移定义为 M1(n=5)。在无复发生存率(RFS)方面,N0 与 N1(p<0.001)、N1 与 N2(p=0.047)以及 N1 与 M1(p=0.044)之间存在显著差异,但 N2 与 M1(p=0.683)之间无显著差异。此外,将区域淋巴结转移的患者分为两组:Np 组(n=35,仅在胰头区域有 LNM)和 Nd 组(n=8,在其他区域有 LNM)。在 RFS 方面,N0 与 Np(p<0.001)、Np 与 Nd(p=0.004)以及 Np 与 M1(p=0.033)之间存在显著差异,但 Nd 与 M1(p=0.883)之间无显著差异。RFS 的 Cox 比例风险分析显示,≥3 个 LNM(风险比[HR],3.22)和除胰头区域以外的 LNM(HR,4.27)是独立的预后不良因素。
≥3 个 LNM 和除胰头区域以外的区域 LNM 与 M1 患者的预后相似,均较差。