Suppr超能文献

比较不同淋巴结分期系统对壶腹癌患者术后总生存的预测性能。

Comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma.

作者信息

Li Xun, Chen Lin, Li Junli

机构信息

Department of Blood Transfusion, Jingzhou Hospital Affiliated to Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Jingzhou Hospital Affiliated to Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Feb 27;10:1002411. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1002411. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

AIM

This study was to analyze and compare the predictive performance of the 7th and the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N staging system, lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph node (LODDS) for the survival of patients with ampullary carcinomas (ACs).

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study included patients with primary ACs after surgery from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2004-2015. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used. The study population was divided into a training set and a testing set in a ratio of 7-3. The C-index and area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare the predictive performance of the four staging on overall survival (OS) in the training set and the testing set.

RESULTS

A total of 7,480 patients with primary ACs (1,178 survived and 1,128 dead) were in this study. The average follow-up time was 41.1 months. N1 stage and N2 stage of the 8th edition AJCC N staging system, LNR staging (0-0.3), LNR (>0.3), LODDS (-2.4 to -0.8) and LODDS (>-0.8) were associated with OS in AC patients after adjusting for age, race, pT stage, tumor size, grade, radiation, and insurance. The C-index of the 7th AJCC N staging was significantly lower than the C-index of the 8th AJCC N staging in the training set [0.608 vs. 0.629,  < 0.001] and testing set [0.635 vs. 0.658,  < 0.001]. The C-index of the LODDS staging was significantly higher than the C-index of the 8th AJCC N staging in the training set [0.641 vs. 0.629,  = 0.034] and testing set [0.671 vs. 0.658,  = 0.034]. LODDS staging may be a potential predictor of OS at 6 months [AUC = 0.687], 12 months (AUC = 0.692), and 48 months (AUC = 0.709), and LNR staging (AUC = 0.655) may be a potential predictor of OS at 24 months in AC patients. The predictive ability of LNR staging and LODDS staging were also found in different subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The LNR and LODDS staging systems' predictive performance for OS of AC patients were superior to the 8th edition AJCC N staging system, especially in patients ages ≥65 or with higher tumor grade (grade II and III). The LNR staging and the LODDS staging were potential predictors for 24-month OS, and 6, 12, 24 and 48-month OS, respectively.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析并比较美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版和第8版N分期系统、淋巴结比率(LNR)以及阳性淋巴结对数比值(LODDS)对壶腹癌(AC)患者生存情况的预测性能。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2004 - 2015年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中接受手术治疗的原发性AC患者。采用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险模型。研究人群按7:3的比例分为训练集和测试集。使用C指数和曲线下面积(AUC)比较这四种分期系统在训练集和测试集中对总生存期(OS)的预测性能。

结果

本研究共纳入7480例原发性AC患者(1178例存活,1128例死亡)。平均随访时间为41.1个月。在校正年龄、种族、pT分期、肿瘤大小、分级、放疗和保险情况后,第8版AJCC N分期系统的N1期和N2期、LNR分期(0 - 0.3)、LNR(>0.3)、LODDS(-2.4至-0.8)以及LODDS(>-0.8)与AC患者的OS相关。在训练集[0.608对0.629,<0.001]和测试集[0.635对0.658,<0.001]中,第7版AJCC N分期的C指数显著低于第8版AJCC N分期。在训练集[0.641对0.629,=0.034]和测试集[0.671对0.658,=0.034]中,LODDS分期的C指数显著高于第8版AJCC N分期。LODDS分期可能是6个月(AUC = 0.687)、12个月(AUC = 0.692)和48个月(AUC = 0.709)时OS的潜在预测指标,而LNR分期(AUC = 0.655)可能是AC患者24个月时OS的潜在预测指标。在不同亚组中也发现了LNR分期和LODDS分期的预测能力。

结论

LNR和LODDS分期系统对AC患者OS的预测性能优于第8版AJCC N分期系统,尤其是在年龄≥65岁或肿瘤分级较高(II级和III级)的患者中。LNR分期和LODDS分期分别是24个月OS以及6、12、24和48个月OS的潜在预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a0/10008877/6b604fb11f1f/fsurg-10-1002411-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验